Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effects of Soundscapes on Forest Landscape Preference

사운드스케이프를 활용한 산림경관 선호도 평가에 관한 연구

  • Min, Su-Hui (Forest Land Research Center, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Lee, Chun-Yong (Forest Land Research Center, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Joo, Woo-Yeong (Forest Land Research Center, Korea Forest Conservation Association)
  • 민수희 (한국산지보전협회 산지연구센터) ;
  • 이천용 (한국산지보전협회 산지연구센터) ;
  • 주우영 (한국산지보전협회 산지연구센터)
  • Received : 2014.02.28
  • Accepted : 2014.08.13
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the effects of soundscapes on forest landscape preference in the Baekdudaegan protected area. The study sites were selected in Jeombongsan and Sobaek National park selected within the Baekdudaegan. The landscape preference surveys were conducted by using landscape adjectives classified with Nature, Sound, Attractiveness, and Aesthetics. The comparative analyses examined the difference of preferences between only visual landscapes and visual landscapes with soundscapes. The research found out that soundscapes were associated with landscape characteristics, and positively correlated with the improvement in landscape preference. Thus, the research can infer that forest landscape assessment consider visual attributes as well as soundscape cues.

본 연구는 산림에서의 여가, 휴양 및 산림복지 등 녹색서비스와 공익적 가치 증대로 산림경관 조성과 관리의 중요성이 높아짐에 따라 다원적 가치를 지닌 산림경관의 보전과 관리를 위해 사운드스케이프를 활용한 산림경관 선호도 평가 및 경관특성을 분석하고자 하였다. 백두대간 보호지역 내 점봉산, 소백산 산림경관을 대상으로 시 청각 경관형용사를 활용한 경관평가를 실시하고 사운드스케이프 유무에 따른 산림경관 선호도 및 선호요인, 경관유형별 경관특성(자연성, 음향성, 매력성, 심미성)을 도출하여 비교분석하였다. 사운드스케이프가 산림경관 선호도와 경관특성에 긍정적인 상관성을 지녀 이용자의 산림경관 선호도와 경관의 질적 향상에 영향을 미치는 것으로 도출된 본 연구결과는 산림경관을 보는 경관뿐만 아니라 듣는 경관의 관점으로 접근하는 계기이자 산림경관 내 사운드스케이프 관리의 필요성을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, L.M. 1983. Effect of sounds on Preherences for Outdoor Settings. Environment & Behavior 15(5): 560-565.
  2. Charles, F.L. 1989. Introduction to Physiological Psychology. Prentice Hall College Div; 3 Sub edition. English. p. 528.
  3. Cho, J.H. 2010. A study on the correlation analysis between colorscape and soundscape. Master's thesis of graduate school of industry. Hongik University. pp. 116.
  4. Cho, W.H. and Im, S.B. 2013. A Study on the Relationship between Visual Preferences and Visitors' Satisfaction in Bukhansan Dulegil. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(1): 1-11.
  5. Dumyahn, S.L. and Pijanowski, B.C. 2011. Soundscape conservation. Springer Science + Business Media 26(9).
  6. Feimer, N.R., Craik, K.H., Smardon, R.C., and Sheppard, S.R.J. 1979. Appraising the reliability of visual impact assessment methods. Preceedings of Our National Landscape : A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of visual resources, Berkeley, Calif. : USDA Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PSW-35: 286-295.
  7. Gage, S.H., Napoletano, BM., and Cooper, M.C. 2001. Assessment of ecosystem biodiversity by acoustic diversity indices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 2430.
  8. Han, B.H., Hong, S.H., Kim, C.S., Jang, C.H., and Lee, M.Y. 2011. The Visual Evaluation and Categorizationof the Landscape Resource -In Case of Seoraksan National Park-. Journal of Environmental and Ecology 21(1): 120-123.
  9. Im, S.B. 2009. Theory in landscape analysis. Seoul National University Press. Seoul. pp. 307.
  10. Joo, S.H. 2012. The Study on the Landscape Preference and Characteristics of the Agricultural Aqueduct Bridges. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 18(3): 67-76. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.3.067
  11. Joo, W.Y., Stuart H.G., and Eric P.K. 2011. Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urbanrural gradient. Landscape Urban Planning 103(3): 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.001
  12. Kang, M.H. and Kim, S.I. 2010. Development of Evaluation Indices for Forest Landscape Classification. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(6): 777-784.
  13. Kim, H.G. 2012. Study related to the effect on user's satisfaction to the introduction of soundscape in interior landscaping. Master's thesis of Graduate school. Dongshin university. pp. 84.
  14. Ko, H.J., Song, B.H., and Yang, B.E. 2006. A study on the influencing factors of the view preferences. Journal of Environmental and Ecology 6(4): 3-10.
  15. Korea Forest Service. 2009. Forest landscape management planning. Korea Forest Service. DaeJeon. pp. 66.
  16. Ministry of Environment. 2006. A Development for Application Method of Spontaneous Acoustic Field Reproduction System and for Acoustic Amenity Index. Ministry of Environment. Gwacheon. pp. 296.
  17. Oh, Y.K. and Han, M.H. 2007. Interaction Between Seasons and Auditory Elements. Features and Impressions of Soundscape in Influencing Auditory Preferences. Journal of Noise and Vibration Engineering 26(7): 306-316.
  18. Pijanowski, B.C., Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Dumyahn, S.L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B.M., Gage, S.H., and Pieretti, N. 2011. Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience 61(3): 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6
  19. Qi, J., Gage, S.H., Joo, W., Napoletano, B., and Biswas, S. 2008. Soundscape characteristics of an environment: A new ecological indicator of ecosystem health. In W. Ji (Ed.), Wetland and water resource modeling and assessment. New York: CRC Press.
  20. Shin, H., Song, M.J., Kim, S.W., and Jang, G.S. 2007. A study on the Visual and Aural Information Effect as the Amenity Evaluation Index. Journal of Noise and Vibration Engineering 34(3): 23-31.
  21. Song, M.J. and Shin, H. 2011. A Study on the Characteristics of Electroencephalogram for the Evaluating Words of Soundscape Sound Source When Visual Information is Suggested. Journal of Noise and Vibration Engineering 21(7): 629-636. https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2011.21.7.629
  22. Song, M.J., Shin, H., Baek, G.J., Kim, H.G., and Kook, C. 2011. A Basic Study on the Characteristics of the Electroencephalogram Corresponded with the Evaluating Words of Soundscape Sound Source. Journal of Environmental and Ecology 11(3): 49-56.
  23. Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O., and Duvali, S. 2008. Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3(12): e4065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004065
  24. Sung, M.S. 2002. A study on the relationship between the visual preference of landscape and acoustic information. Ph.Doctor's thesis of Graduate school. Kyung Hee University. pp. 102.
  25. Yun, H.J. and Im, S.B. 2006. A Study on the Multi-sensory Preferences and Image Influences of Outdoor Leisure Spaces. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 34(3): 23-31.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Inventory and Grade Evaluation of the Visual Landscape Resource in Mt. Chiak National Park vol.44, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.4.057
  2. 경관형용사를 활용한 생태축 복원사업의 경관변화요인 분석 - 정면경관을 대상으로- vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2017.20.1.97