DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis about Learning Objectives of Informatics Textbooks in High School using Anderson's and Fuller's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

Anderson과 Fuller의 교육목표 분류법을 이용한 고등학교 정보 교과서의 수업 목표 분석

  • 최현종 (서원대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2014.08.08
  • Accepted : 2014.09.03
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This study has analyzed the learning objectives in 6 Informatics textbooks that were published this year in the basis of 2009 revised curriculum using Anderson's taxonomy of Educational Objectives that was a revision of Bloom's taxonomy and Fuller's taxonomy that was presented for programming activities. Some dimensions of Anderson's taxonomy, such as conceptual and procedural knowledge, understand and apply in cognitive process are much more used in learning objectives in 6 Informatics textbooks. Interpreting and producing dimensions of taxonomy are well presented to balance in 6 Informatics textbooks by analysis of Fuller's taxonomy. This results will be a good case study in research about taxonomy of educational objectives and development of Informatics textbooks.

본 연구는 Bloom의 교육목표 분류법이 가지고 있는 문제점을 수정한 Anderson의 분류법과 프로그래밍 수업목표에 적용할 수 있는 Fuller의 분류법으로 2009 개정 교육과정에 의해 새롭게 출판된 고등학교 정보 교과서 6종을 분석하였다. Anderson 분류법에 의하면 교과서마다 차이가 있기는 하지만 개념적 지식과 절차적 지식, 이해하다와 적용하다의 목표들이 더 많이 제시되어 있음을 확인하였다. Fuller 분류법으로 동종의 교과서 6종을 분석해 보니 프로그램 코드의 해석과 생산 영역이 대체로 균형 있게 제시되어 있었다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 추후 이루어지는 정보 교과만의 교육목표 분류법 연구와 교과서 개발에 좋은 사례가 될 것으로 전망한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Online dictionary, 'education', http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=510035&cid=42126&categoryId=42126
  2. Online dictionary, 'instructional objectives', http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1944124&cid=41989&categoryId=41989
  3. S.B.Park, et al., "Effective Teaching", Academy Press, 2006.
  4. D. R. Krathwohl, "A Revision Bloom's Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory into Practice", pp. 212-218, 2002.
  5. B. S. Bloom, "Taxonomy of Education Objectives, Handbook I : Cognitive Domain", Longman, 1956.
  6. D. R. Krathwohl, et al., "Taxonomy for Educational Objectives, Handbook 2: Affective Domain", David McKay Co., 1964.
  7. A. J. Harrow, "A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain", David McKay Co., 1972.
  8. C.H.Lim, "Analysis of Objectives and Contents of Nature Subject in Elementary School", Journal of Elementary Education, Vol.10, 1997.
  9. G. M. Seddon, "The Properties of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objective for the Cognitive Domain", Review of Educational Research, Vol.48, No.2, pp. 303-323, 1978. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048002303
  10. C. G. Johnson and U. Fuller, "Is Bloom's Taxonomy Appropriate for Computer Science", '06 Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research. New York, ACM, 2006.
  11. A. D. Hauenstein, "Conceptual Framework for Educational Objective: A Holistic Approach to Traditional Taxonomies", University Press of America, 1998.
  12. R. J. Marzano, "Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Corwin Press, 2001.
  13. L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, et al., "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives". Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
  14. U. Fuller, et al., "Developing a Computer Science-Specific Learning Taxonomy". ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol.39, No.4, pp. 152-170, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1145/1345375.1345438
  15. H.S.Kim, et al., "Classifications of Instructional Objectives of Elementary Science based on Bloom`s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, Vol.26, No.5, pp. 570-579, 2007.
  16. Y.H.Kim, et al., "Analysis of Summative Evaluation Objectives in Middle School Biology based on Bloom`s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Research about Science Education, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 164-174, 2010.
  17. C.G.Park, et al., "A Comparative Analysis of Instructional Objectives of Laboratory Work in Korean and U. S. High School Biology Textbooks according to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 27-43, 2011.
  18. G. Y. Lee and T. M. You, "Analysis of Cognitive Learning Objectives in the 2007 Home Economics High School Textbooks and Achievement Standards by the Anderson's 'Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Home Economies Education Association, Vol.23, No.3, pp. 53-68, 2011.
  19. M.J.Lee, et al., "Analysis of Home Economics Textbooks of 2007 Revised Curriculum Based on 'A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 149-176, 2011. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2011.17.2.149
  20. M. O. Kim and H. S. Kang, "Analysis of Instructional Objectives of the Elementary Korean Curriculum Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.30, No.1, pp. 27-58, 2012.
  21. H. J. Jin, "Analysis and Standard Development of Instructional Objectives for Informatics Subject in Elementary School", The Journal of Korean association of computer education, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 47-59, 2009.
  22. H. J. Choe, "Study of Analysis About Learning Objectives of Informatics Textbooks in Middle School using Anderson's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives". The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 51-63, 2014.
  23. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology, "Informatics Subject of 2007 Revised Curriculum", 2007.
  24. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology, "Informatics Subject of 2009 Revised Curriculum", 2011.
  25. D. E. Biling and B. S. Furniss, "Aims, Methods and Assessment in Advanced Science Education". Heyden, 1973.
  26. E. A. Lahtinen, "A Categorization of Novice Programmers: A Cluster Analysis Study", Proceedings of the 19th annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 32-41, 2007.
  27. C. Andrew, "Bloom's Digital Taxonomy", http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy