DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Noise Exposure in the Tank Gun Drill Ranges

군대 전차포 훈련장에서의 소음노출 특성

  • Hwang, Sung Ho (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ajou University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae Bum (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ajou University, School of Medicine)
  • 황성호 (아주대학교 의과대학 직업환경의학교실) ;
  • 박재범 (아주대학교 의과대학 직업환경의학교실)
  • Received : 2013.08.05
  • Accepted : 2014.02.27
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

Objectives: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the noise level exposures at the different cannonball type and locations in the tank gun drill ranges. Methods: We visited the tank gun drill ranges and measured with a sound level meter(3M Quest SoundPro$^{TM}$) with the value of Peak(dB(A)). Results: The highest peak value of impulse noise level averaged 166.3 dB(A) at the site of loading solider. The highest peak value of impulse noise level by size of cannonball averaged 165.9 dB(A) at the 120 mm size cannonball of the tank. This result was significantly different from the other size of cannonballs such as 7.62 mm, 90 mm, and 105 mm(p < 0.001). Among the four types of soldier site on the tank, average noise levels of loading soldier, 156.6 dB(A), were higher than the other three types of soldier site (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study confirmed that there were needed for a proper control to reduce the amount of impulse noise exposure at the tank gun drill ranges.

Keywords

References

  1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold limit values and biological exposure indices for chemical substances. Cincinnati Ohio, 2012.
  2. Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI). Hearing conservation program, 2010.
  3. Henselman LW, Henderson D, Shadoan J, Subramaniam M, Saunders S et al. Effects of noise exposure, race, and years of service on hearing in U.S. Army soldiers. Ear and Hearing 1995;16(4):382-91 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199508000-00005
  4. Kim H, Cho SH, Lim HS. The effect of gunshot or cannonade training during military service on hearing threshold levels. Korean J Prevent Med 1991;24(1):86-92
  5. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Exposure limits for chemical substances and physical Agents(MoEL Public Notice No. 2010-44).; 2010. p. 81-82
  6. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing conservation amendment, federal register 46. Washington DC 1981.
  7. Park KH, Yoon SW, Woo HY, Na SH, Van YD et al. Clinico-audiological evaluation of noise induced hearing loss in army pilots. Korean J Otolaryngol 1984;27(1):20-27
  8. Salmivalli A, Military audilogical aspects in noiseinduced hearing losses. Acta Otalaryngol Suppl 1979;360:96-97
  9. Savolainen S, Lehtomaki KM. Impulse noise and acute acoustic trauma in Finnish conscripts. Number of shots fired and safe distances. Scandinavian Audiology 1997;26(2):122-26 https://doi.org/10.3109/01050399709074985
  10. Ylikoski ME, Ylikoski JS. Hearing loss and handicap of professional soldiers exposed to gunfire noise. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environmental Health 1994;20(2):93-100 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1415