방사성폐기물학회지 (Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT))

  • 제12권1호
  • /
  • Pages.59-68
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1738-1894(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5471(eISSN)
한국방사성폐기물학회 (Korean Radioactive Waste Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중·저준위 방사성폐기물 천층처분시설에서 시추 후 거주시나리오 평가를 통한 폐쇄 후 제도적 관리기간 연구

Study on the Institutional Control Period Through the Post-drilling Scenario Of Near Surface Disposal Facility for Low and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste

  • 투고 : 2013.10.02
  • 심사 : 2013.11.18
  • 발행 : 2014.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

처분시설은 폐쇄 후 제도적 관리기간 동안에는 처분 부지로의 일반인의 접근을 제한하며 제도적 관리기간 이후에는 부주의 한 인간침입 시에도 처분시설로 인한 방사선적 영향으로부터 침입자를 보호하도록 설계 되어야 한다. 본 논문에서는 처분시설이 부주의한 침입자에 미칠 수 있는 방사선적 영향을 GENII 프로그램을 사용하여 평가해보았다. 처분고별 적치되는 방사성폐기물의 종류를 달리하여 평가하고 제도적 관리기간 설정에 따른 침입자에 대한 영향도 분석하였다. 평가결과 제도적 관리기간을 두지 않아도 폐필터가 적치된 처분고를 제외하고 모두 성능 목표치를 만족하였다. 하지만 폐필터를 적치한 처분고의 경우 인간침입 평가결과 제도적 관리기간 300년이 되어서야 성능목표치를 만족할 수 있었다. 폐필터와 함께 잡고체 폐기물을 혼합하여 적치하는 경우 제도적 관리기간을 줄일 수 있었으며, 폐필터는 다른 폐기물과 함께 적치하여 제도적 관리기간을 줄이는 것이 필요하다. 폐기물 적치시 방사능을 고려하여 처분고 적치방안을 적절히 수립하는 것이 국부적인 방사능의 최대값을 줄일 수 있어 방사선적 안전성을 확보하며 제도적 관리기간을 단축할 수 있어 바람직하다.

The public's access to the disposal facilities should be restricted during the institutional control period. Even after the institutional control period, disposal facilities should be designed to protect radiologically against inadvertent human intruders. This study is to assess the effective dose equivalent to the inadvertent intruder after the institutional control period thorough the GENII. The disposal unit was allocated with different kind of radioactive waste and the effects of the radiation dose to inadvertent intruder were evaluated in accordance with the institutional control period. As a result, even though there is no institutional control period, all were satisfied with the regulatory guide, except for the disposal unit with only spent filter. However, the disposal unit with only spent filter was satisfied with the regulatory guide after the institutional control period of 300 years. But the disposal unit with spent filter mixed with dry active waste could shorten the institutional control period. So the institutional control period can be reduced through the mixing the other waste with spent filter in disposal unit. Therefore, establishing an appropriate plan for the disposal unit with spent filter and other radioactive waste will be effective for radiological safety and reduction of the institutional control period, rather than increasing the institutional control period and spending costs for the maintenance and conservation for the disposal unit with only spent filter.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nuclear Safety Act No. 11715 Article 2 (Definitions), NSSC (2011).
  2. Enforcement Decree of the Nuclear Safety Act, No 23248, Article 2 (Definitions), NSSC (2011).
  3. Supporting Law for the Region that has Low and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2011).
  4. Ministry of Education and Science Technology, a white book of nuclear, pp. 215-216 (2010).
  5. Notice of NSSC, No. 2012-50, Technical Standards for the Location of Low- and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities (2012).
  6. "KORAD 2nd Disposal Facility is Near Surface Type", YONHAPNEWS, 2010. 10. 21, http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=001&aid=0004719195
  7. "Export Both Nuclear Power Plant And Technology Managing Radioactive Waste", EDAILY 2010.11.16, http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?newsid=02240246593166376&SCD=&DCD=A00105
  8. Notice of NSSC, No 2012-55, "Radiological Protection Criteria for Long-term Safety on Lowand Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal" (2012).
  9. J.B. Park, J.W. Park, E.Y. Lee, and C.L. Kim, "Statistical Approach For Derivation of Quantitative Acceptance Criteria For Radioactive Wastes To Near Surface Disposal Facility", J. of Korean Nuclear Society, 35(5), pp.387-398 (2003).
  10. J.B. Park, S.M. Park, J.W. Park, E.Y. Lee, C.G. Lee, and C.L. Kim, "Quantitative Acceptance Criteria For Radioactive Wastes To Near Surface Disposal Facility", KHNP, Technical Report, TR.01NC03. C2003.2.
  11. B. A. Napier, R.A. Peloquin, D. L. Strenge, and J. V. Ramsdell, "GENII-The Hanford Experimental Radiation Dosimetry Software System, Volume 1: Conceptual Representation", PNL-6584 Vol. 1 (1988).
  12. W. E. Kennedy and R. A. Peloquin, "Intruder Scenarios for Specific Low-Level Radioactive Waste Classification" DOE/LLW-71T.4 (1998).
  13. R. L. Aaberg, W. E. Kenenedy, and V. W. Thomas, "Definition of Intrusion Scenarios and Example Concentration Ranges for the Disposal of Nearsurface Waste at the Hanford Site" PNL-631 (1990).
  14. KORAD, "Low and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Disposal Facility Safety Analysis Report" (2010).
  15. Notice of NSSC, No 2012-55, "Acceptance Criteria for Low- and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste" (2013).
  16. KORAD, "Low and Intermediate-Level Radioactive 2nd Disposal Facility Construction of the Basic Design Report" (2013).
  17. KORAD, "1st Disposal Facility Waste Inventory Revaluation Report (Revision 2)"(2013).
  18. Drilling Survey Planning Institute of the Editorial Board, "Comparative Analysis of Core Drilling and Drilling Investigations in the R / C Drilling. Journal of drilling survey" (2006).
  19. KHNP, "Sinwolsung 1,2 Unit Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment for Operating Permit" (2011)

피인용 문헌

  1. Determination of Radionuclide Concentration Limit for Low and Intermediate-level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility I : Application of IAEA Methodology for Underground Silo Type Disposal Facility vol.15, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2017.15.3.257