Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Scheme of the Pulp Price Discrimination from Certified forests and Non-certified forests for Sustainable Forest Management

지속가능한 산림관리를 위한 인증산림과 비인증산림에서 생산된 펄프재의 가격차별화 방안

  • Choi, Sang Hyun (Department of Forest Management, Graduate School, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae Hwan (Department of Forest Management, Graduate School, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Woo, Jong-Choon (Department of Forest Management, Kangwon National University)
  • 최상현 (강원대학교 대학원 산림경영학과) ;
  • 이재환 (강원대학교 대학원 산림경영학과) ;
  • 우종춘 (강원대학교 산림경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.07.22
  • Accepted : 2014.09.11
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to provide resonable price of timber that come out from certified forests for sustainable forest management. To accomplish this study objectives, we analyzed compound interest method, willingness to pay (WTP) and price sensitivity measurement (PSM) when buying certified pulp. In case of compound interest method, we used prime cost by average price per ha of each area (Hongcheon, Inje, Shinnam) and unit price that add up the pulp price and investment costs. Interest rate reflects 2 to 6% and investment period apply to 5 years. WTP and PSM data were collected from questionnaire survey. As a result, if apply to interest rate of 2% and investment period of 3 years, result values are quite similar to WTP of 5% and optimal pricing point of PSM. That also showed similar pattern in each area.

본 연구는 지속가능한 산림관리를 위한 산림경영인증림과 비인증림에서 생산된 펄프재의 가격차별화 방안을 합리적으로 제시하기 위해 수행하였다. 홍천과 인제, 신남지역의 산림경영인증림을 대상으로 투자비용과 목재가격을 조사하여 복리산식, 지불의사금액, 가격민감성분석을 실시하였다. 복리산식의 경우, 펄프재의 원가는 각 지역의 평균 $m^3$당 펄프재가격을 사용하였으며, 원금은 $m^3$당 펄프재가격에 투자비용을 합산하였다. 이율은 2~6%까지 적용해 보았으며, 투자 후 경과기간은 5년까지 계산하였다. 지불의사금액과 가격민감성분석은 설문분석을 통해 값을 도출하였다. 복리산식에서 이율 2%로 적용 시 경과기간 3년의 값과 이율 5~6%적용 시 경과기간을 1년으로 주어진 값이 추가 지불의사금액 5%와 가격민감성분석의 방법으로 도출된 최적가격 값과 유사한 결과 값으로 나타났으며 홍천, 인제, 신남지역에서 모두 결과 값이 동일한 패턴으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cashore, B. 2009. Differences That "Matter?" Identifying Analytical Challenges in the Comparison of Forest Certification Standards. YALE School of Forestry. FSC. 2012. FSC Annual Report. pp. 8-22.
  2. Gabor, A. and Granger, C.W. J. 1966. Price as Indicator of Quality Report on an Enquiry. Economica. pp. 33-45.
  3. Hall, P.J. 2001. Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 67: 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006433132539
  4. Kim, J. . 2003. Implementation of Sustainable Forest Management and Monitoring System Established. Korea Forest Research Institute 5-3: 544-596.
  5. Kim, Y.S. 2008. Economics Evaluation and Supply Planning Development on Domestic Wood Harvesting and Timber Transportation. Korea Forest Service 4: 49-88.
  6. Kooten, V. 2005. Certification of Sustainable Forest Management Practices: a global perspective on why countries certify. Forest Policy and Economics 7(6): 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.04.003
  7. Korea Forest Service. 2012. Statistical yearbook of forestry.
  8. Korea Forest Service. 2012. Wood supply generalization list.
  9. Salvador, S. 2010. Contribution of FSC certification to reducing GHG emissions. Germany.
  10. Seol, M.H. 2009. Incorporated Model to Improve Profits of Forest Communities and Non-Governmental Organizations with Application of Forest Certification. The jounal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 21(1): 6-12.
  11. Woo, E.J. 2008. Analysis of Consumer's Behavior, Price Sensitivity, and Price Elasticity by Money Attitude in Institutional Foodservice. Yeonsei University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)