농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.243-252
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농촌마을 어메니티 자원의 속성별 가치 평가 - 농촌다움의 가치평가 -

Valuing Amenity attributes of Farm Village using Choice Experiment - Valuing Rurality-

  • 투고 : 2014.10.21
  • 심사 : 2014.12.26
  • 발행 : 2014.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study strengthens importance of farm land has possessed rurality. Thus the amenities of farm village were offered to the symbolical attributes of rurality and it was extracted four amenities attributes for valuing the amenities. Possessing the importance of rurality for agricultural and rural development and rural tourism evaluated each attribute by Choice Experiment(CE) for sustainable development make full use of rurality. Applying for Conditional-Logit model estimated the value of attributes then consumer's benefit feeling form each attributes was offered to the value of a unit change. Through this study, I wish to apply for the direction of rural development as important material and the compensation in the operation of agricultural output offering social benefit as political reference materials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. and Williams, M., 1994, Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, pp. 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017
  2. Ahn, Tong Mahn, Son, Ju Dong, Kim, Myung Soo, 2005, Rurality and Preferences of Rural Landscapes in Korea, Journal of Korean society of rural planning 11(3), pp.43-52.
  3. Ahn, Yoon Soo, Kim, Eun Ja, Kim, Young, Seo, Chung Ho, 2005, Monetary Valuation of the Sociocultural Commonweal Functions From the Rural Communities in Korea, The Korean Rural Sociological Society, 5(1), pp.175-213.
  4. Bergstrom, J.C., B.L. Dillman, and J.R. Stoll, 1985, Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The case of Prime Agriculture Land, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17, pp.139-149.
  5. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E and W. Adamowicz, 1998 Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, pp. 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008287310583
  6. Hensher, D. A., 1994, Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices, The State of Practice, Transportation, 21, pp.107-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098788
  7. Jeon, Young Ok, 2003, The Direction of Agricultural Amenity For Agricultural Economic Activity, SERI.
  8. Kim, Kwang Im, Park, Young Ha, Choi, Jae Young, Park, Je Keun, Park, So Yeon, 2006, Method for Valuing scenery and Management of Agriculture, KEI, pp, 1-204
  9. Kim, Samg Bum, Rhee, Sang-Young, Jung, Nam Su, Lee, Ji-min, Cho, Soon Jae, Lee, Jeong Jae, 2004, Standardized Surveying Method of Rural Amenity Resources with Database Normalization Technique, Korean Society of Rural Planning, 10(4), pp. 1-7.
  10. Kim, Su Suk, Oh, Se Ik, 2003, Valuation of Agricultural Multifunctionality, Journal or Rural Development, 23(2), pp. 1-13.
  11. Choi, Young-Wan, Kim, Young-Joo, 2012, Remodelling of Amenity Resources Classification System Based on Structural Characteristics of Rural Territory, Journal of Korean society of rural planning 18(1), pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.1.001
  12. Krinsky, I. And A. Robb, 1986, On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics 86, pp.715-719.
  13. Kwon, Oh Sang, 2007, Environmental Economics second edition, Park Young.
  14. Kwon, Oh Sang, Lim, Young Ah, Kim, Won Hee, 2007, Economic Values of Recreational Water : Rafting on the Hantan River, Korean Resource Economics Association, 16(3), pp.427-451.
  15. Kwon, Oh Sang, Yun, Tae Yeon, 2004, Amenity Value of Rice Farming, Korea Agricultural Economics Association, 45(2), pp. 235-261.
  16. Louviere, J, J., 1988a, Conjoint Analysis Modeling of Stated Preferences, Riview of Economics and Policy, 10, pp.93-119.
  17. OECD, 1994, The contribution of amenities to rural development, Paris, OECD.
  18. OECD, 1999, Cultivating Rural Amenities, An Economic Development Perspective, Paris OECD.
  19. OECD, 2001, Multifunctionality, Toward an Analytical Framework, Paris, OECD.
  20. Oh, Yun Gyeong, Cho, Soon Jae, Choi, Jin Yong, Im, Seung Bin, Ahn, Tong Mahn, Lee, Jeong Jae, Lee, Dong Kun, 2007, Rural Amenity Resources Survey, Journal of Korean society of rural planning, 13(1), pp.1-9.
  21. Park, Chang-Sug, Jeon, Young-Ok, Joh, Young-Kug, 2002, An Analysis of their Importance Degree and Ordinal Correlation of Rural Resources for the Rural Amenity, Korea Planners Association, 37(6), pp.21-35.
  22. Sakai Kenichi, 1998, Practical Ideas Beyond Environmental, AMR.
  23. Statistics Korea, 2010, Population Projection.

피인용 문헌

  1. Analyzing the Impact of Agrophotovoltaic Power Plants on the Amenity Value of Agricultural Landscape: The Case of the Republic of Korea vol.13, pp.20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011325