Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study on the Global Emission Reduction Commitments and Environment Change After Climate Agreement

기후협정후의 배출감소와 환경변화이행에 관한 연구

  • 김경우 (을지대학교 중독재활복지학과)
  • Received : 2014.10.08
  • Accepted : 2014.12.06
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Although most of the debate on global climate change policy has focused on quantity controls due to their political appeal, this paper argues that agreement commitment are more efficient. Scenarios show that to have a likely chance of limiting the increase in global mean temperature to two degrees Celsius, means lowering global greenhouse gas emissions by 40 to 70 percent compared with 2010 by mid-century, and to near-zero by the end of this century. Ambitious mitigation may even require removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This paper emphasizes on global cooperation which is a key for preventing global warming and toward sustainable development, and fair emission reduction targets among countries are significant for achieving emission reductions.

지구 기후 변화 정책에 대한 논쟁의 대부분은 그들의 정치적 호소에 대한 초점을 맞추고 있지만, 이 논문은 계약의 약속이 보다 효율적임을 제기한다. 이 목표에 부합하는 기후 정책은 상당한 배출 감축을 목표로 한다. 이러한 시나리오가 지구 평균 기온의 증가를 제한한다. 21세기 중반까지 2010에 비해 40~70%에 의해 세계 온실 가스 배출량을 낮추겠다는 의미이며, 대기로부터 이산화탄소를 제거할 수 있다는 결론에 이른다. 이 논문은 환경과 개발(UNCED)에 관한 유엔 회의 자료를 분석하여 이러한 비교를 제공한다. 분석내용은 결론적으로 각 나라들이 협정에서 제시한대로 배출오염 물질을 줄이는데 이행하고 지구 온난화의 지속적인 발전방안이 요구되는 협력체계가 중요하다는 것을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew Allan and Marton Kruppa (10 December 2012), "Belarus negotiator hints at Kyoto exit, says others could follow", REUTERS (Reuters), retrieved 2012.
  2. IPCC SAR WG3, Bruce, J. P.; Lee, H.; and Haites, E. F., ed., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change (PDF), Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  3. King, D., et al, International climate change negotiations: Key lessons and next steps, Oxford, UK: Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, 2011.
  4. UNFCCC, Information provided by Annex I Parties relating to Appendix I of the Copenhagen Accord (quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020), 2011.
  5. UNFCCC, FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/INF.1: Compilation of information on nationally appropriate mitigation actions to be implemented by Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention, Geneva, Switzerland: UN Office, 2011.
  6. UNFCCC (United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change). Kyoto Protocol. United Nation, 2010
  7. Integovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., and New York, N.Y., U.S.A.. This version: IPCC website. Retrieved 2011.
  8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . "5.2 Key vulnerabilities, impacts and risks - long-term perspectives". In Core Writing Team, Pachauri, 2007.
  9. R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.). Synthesis Report. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. This version: IPCC website. Retrieved 2011.
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change "The long-term perspective". In Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.), 2007.
  11. Sterman, J.D. and L.B. Sweeney, "Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter", Climatic Change, 2007.
  12. UNFCCC. Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP) , Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol. Draft decision proposed by the President (EN), 2012.
  13. "U.N. Global Warming Summit: Heading Over the Climate Cliff". Time. 27 November 2012.
  14. Goldemberg, J.,et al., "Scope of the Assessment: 1.4.1 General issues: Benchmarks", in IPCC SAR WG3 2006, pp. 32-33 (pp.38-39 of PDF), 2010.
  15. Nagendra P. Shrestha, "Assessment of Environmental Burden od Indusreies": An Input Outpit Analysis. Climatic Change, 2013.
  16. Ferenc L. Toth, "Modeling National Mitigation Scenarios with the IAEA Energy Supply Model", International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014.