Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A nationwide analysis of mammalian biodiversity hotspots in South Korea

전국단위의 포유류 생물다양성우수지역 분석 연구

  • Received : 2014.10.01
  • Accepted : 2014.12.08
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Hotspots are top sites in terms of species diversity as the most threatened and most diverse sites which have been used to select priority areas for reserves. The purpose of this paper is to identify biodiversity hotspots through analyzing nationwide spatial patterns of species richness and rarity of Korean mammals. Four endangered mammals and eleven common mammals were selected as target species. Environmental variables as model input data were consisted of topography, distance, and vegetation structure etc. and Maxent was used to develop species distribution models for target species. Species richness and rarity were used as index of biodiversity. The results of this study were as follows. Firstly, hotspots of species richness for endangered mammals were in high elevation and steep mountain areas. However, species richness for whole mammals were high in low elevation of mountains. Secondly, distribution pattern of species rarity for endangered mammals were similar as richness. However, hotspots of species rarity for whole mammals were a little different from species richness. Species rarity was high in both low and high elevation of mountain areas. This study will provide the useful information for a biodiversity assessment, a habitat conservation, a national ecological network plan, and the management of protected areas.

생물다양성우수지역은 종다양성이 가장 우수한 지역 또는 훼손될 우려가 가장 큼에도 생물상이 가장 다양한 지역으로서, 생물다양성 보전을 위한 최적지를 선택하는 데 필수적인 요소이다. 이 연구의 목적은 포유류를 대상으로 전국단위에서 종풍부도, 희귀도를 분석하여 생물다양성우수지역을 파악하는 것이다. 대상종은 멸종위기 포유류 4종, 일반종 11종 등 총 15종을 선정하였다. 지형, 거리, 식생구조 등을 환경변수로 설정하였고, Maxent(Maximum Entropy Method)를 활용하여 종분포모형을 구축하였다. 종풍부도와 종희귀도를 통해 생물다양성을 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫 번째, 종풍부도를 분석한 결과, 멸종위기 포유류를 대상으로 할 때에는 높고 가파른 산림이 생물다양성우수지역인 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 전체종을 대상으로 했을 때는 저지대 산림에서 종풍부도가 높았다. 두 번째, 멸종위기 포유류를 대상으로 할 때에는 희귀도와 종풍부도가 유사한 공간분포를 보였다. 그러나 전체종을 대상으로 할때에는 저지대 산림 뿐만 아니라 고지대 산림에서도 다소 희귀도가 높은 것으로 나타나, 종풍부도와는 다소 다른 공간분포를 보였다. 이와 같은 연구 결과는 추후 생물다양성 평가, 서식지 보전, 생태축 구축, 보호지역 관리 등에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경과학원. 2003. 자연환경조사는 왜 하는가, 국립환경과학원.(National Institute of Environmental Research. 2003. Why ecosystem survey is need, National Institute of Environmental Research.)
  2. 권혁수, 서창완, 박종화. 2012. 지리산 지역의 생물종 분포모형 구축 및 종풍부도 평가, 한국지형공간정보학회지, 20(3), 11-18. (Kwon, H., Seo, C., Park, C. H. 2012. Development of Species Distribution Models and Evaluation of Species Richness in Jirisan region, Journal of korean society for geospatial information system, 20(3), 11-18.) https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2012.20.3.011
  3. 김지연, 권혁수, 박진영, 이중효, 도재화, 이두범, 김소영, 김동원, 이윤경, 서재화, 서민환, 서창완, 류지은, 오대현. 2011. 전국 자연환경조사 결과를 활용한 종분포모델링 연구(II), 국립환경과학원. (Kim, J., Kwon, H., Park, J., Lee, J., Tho, J., Lee, D., Kim, S., Kim, D., Lee, Y., Suh, J., Suh, M., Seo, C., Ryu, J., Oh, D. H. 2011. Species Distribution modeling using National Ecosystem Survey(II), National Institute of Environmental Research.)
  4. 김지연, 서창완, 권혁수, 류지은, 김명진. 2012. 전국자연환경조사 자료를 이용한 종분포 모형 연구, 한국환경영향평가학회지, 21(4), 593-607. (Kim, J., Seo, C., Kwon, H., Ryu, J., Kim, M. 2012. A study on the species distribution modeling using National Ecosystem Survey data, Journal of Korean society of environmental impact assessment, 21(4), 593-607.)
  5. 정다정, 강경호, 허준, 김창재, 김성호, 이정빈. 2010. 국가 생태정보를 활용한 생물다양성 지도 구축, 2010, 19(6), 573-581. (Jung, D. J., Kang, K. H., Heo, J., Kim, C., Kim, S. H., Lee, J. B. 2010. Mapping for Biodiversity Using National Forest Inventory Data and GIS, Journal of Korean society of environmental impact assessment, 19(6), 573-581.)
  6. 최태영, 박종화. 2004. 설악산국립공원내 산양(Nemorhaedus Caudatus Raddeanus)의 잠재 서식지 적합성 모형; 다기준평가기법(MCE)과 퍼지집합(Fuzzy Set)의 도입을 통하여, 한국조경학회지, 32(4), 28-38. (Choi, T., Park, C. H. 2004. Korean Groal Potential Habitat Suitability Model at Soraksan National Park Using Fuzzy Set and Multi-Criteria Evaluation, Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture, 32(4), 28-38.)
  7. 이동근, 송원경. 2008. 삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정, 2008, 한국조경학회지, 36(5), 64-72. (Lee, D. K., Song, W. K. 2008. A Study on the Analytic Unit of Habitat Suitability Assessment and Selection in Conservation Areas for Leopard Cat, Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture, 36(5), 64-72.)
  8. 서창완, 박유리, 최윤수. 2008. 위치자료의 종류에 따른 생물종 분포모형 비교 연구, 한국지리공간정보학회지, 16(4), 59-64. (Seo, C., Park, Y. R., Choi, Y. S. 2008. Comparison of Species Distribution Models According to Location Data, Journal of korean society for geospatial information system, 16(4), 59-64.)
  9. 송원경, 김은영, 이동근. 2012. 이질적 경관에서의 연결성 측정: 리뷰 및 적용, 한국환경영향평가학회지, 21(3), 391-407. (Song, W., Kim, E., Lee, D. K. 2012. Measuring Connectivity in Heterogenous Landscapes: a Review and Application, Journal of Korean society of environmental imapct assessment, 21(3), 391-407.)
  10. 전성우, 김재욱, 정휘철, 이우균, 김준순. 2014. 생태계 서비스 가치평가를 위한 멸종위기 포유류의 종분포 연구, 한국환경복원기술학회지, 17(1), 111-122. (Jeon, S. W., Kim, J., Jung, H., Lee, W. K., Kim, J. S. 2014. Species Distribution Modeling of Endangered Mammals for Ecosystem Services Valuation, 17(1), 111-122.) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.1.111
  11. Arita, H. T., Figueroa, F., Frisch, A., Rodriguez, P., Santos-del-Prado, K. 1997. Geographical range size and ithe conservation of Mexican mammals, Conservation Biology, 11(1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95274.x
  12. Baquero, R. A., Teller, J. L. 2001. Species richness, rarity and endemicity of European mammals: a biogeographical approach, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016698921404
  13. Bruce, A. S., Lyan, S. K., Jonathan, S. A. 2000. Precious heritage: The status of biodiversity in the U.S., Oxford university press.
  14. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. 2006. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation, PNaS, 103(51), 19374-19379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609334103
  15. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Soberon, J., Salazar, I., Fay, J. P. 2005. Global mammal conservation: what must we manage? Science, 309, 603-607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114015
  16. Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J., Engelman, R. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots, Nature, 404, 990-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/35010105
  17. Conroy, M. J., Noon, B. R. 1996. Mapping of richness for conservation of biological diversity: conceptual and methodological issues, Ecological application, 6(3), 763-773. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269481
  18. Cornell, H. V. 1999. Unsaturation and regional influences on species richness in ecological communities: a review of the evidence, Ecoscience, 6, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1999.11682532
  19. Franklin. J. 2009. Mapping species distributions spatial inference and prediction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Gotelli, N. J., Colwell, R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness, Ecology letter, 4, 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
  21. Granham, C. H., Hijmans, R. J. 2006. A comparision of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(6), 587-587.
  22. Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a conservation blueprint: A practictioner's guide to planning for biodiversity, Washington: Island Press.
  23. Heibl, C., Renner, S. S. 2012. Distribution Models and a Dated Phylogeny for Chilean Oxalis Species Reveal Occupation of New Habitats by Different Lineages, not Rapid adaptive Radiation, Systematic Biology, 61(5), 823-834. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys034
  24. Hu, J., Jiang, Z. 2011. Climate Change Hastens the Conservation Urgency of an Endangered Ungulate, PLOS ONE, 6(8), e22873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022873
  25. Jetz, W., Rahbek, C. 2002. Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness, Science, 297, 1548-1551. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072779
  26. Kerr, J. T. 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation, Conservation Biology, 11(5), 1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96089.x
  27. Lennon, J. J., Koleff, P., Greenwood, J. J. D., Gaston, K. J. 2004. Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness, Ecology Letters, 7, 81-87.
  28. Magurran, A. E. 1998. Ecological diversity and its measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, U.S.A.
  29. Margules, C. R., Pressey, R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251
  30. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A, Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  31. Orme, C. D. L., Davies, R. G., Burgess, M., Eigenbrod, F., Pickup, N., Olson, V. A., Webster, A. J., Ding, T., Rasmussen, P. C., Ridgely, R. S. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat, Nature, 436, 1016-1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03850
  32. Phillips, S. J., anderson, R. P., Schapire, R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling, 190, 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
  33. Phillips, S. J., Dudik, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation, Eography, 31, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
  34. Prendergast, J. R., Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H., Eversham, B. C., Gibbons, D. W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies, Nature, 365, 333-337.
  35. Roberge, J. M., angelstam, P. 2004, Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool, Conservation Biology, 18, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00450.x
  36. Sanderson, E. W., Redford, K. H., Vedder, A., Coppolillo, P. B., Ward, S. 2002. A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00231-6
  37. Scott, J. M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., anderson, H., Caicoo, S., D'Erchia, F., Edwars, T. C., Ulliman, J., Wright R. G. 1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity, Wildlife Monographs.
  38. Trisurat, Y., Bhumpakphan, N., Reed, D. H., Kanchanasaka, B. 2012. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.05.002
  39. Tronstad, L., andersen, M. 2011. Monitoring Rare Land Snails in the Black Hills National Forest. Report prepared by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, Wyoming for the Black Hills National Forest Service, Custer, South Dakota.
  40. Vazquez, L., Gaston, K. J. 2004. Rarity, commonness, and patterns of species richness: the mammals of Mexico, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13, 535-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00126.x
  41. Watson, R. T., Heywood, V. H., Baste, I., Dias, B., Gamez, R., Janetos, T., Reid, W., Ruark, G. 1995. Global Biodiversity assessment, Summary for Policy-Makers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (published for the United Nations Environment Programme).
  42. Wenguang, Z., Yuanman, H., Jinchu, H., Yu, C., Jing, Z., Miao, L. 2008. Impacts of landuse change on mammal diversity in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China: Implications for biodiversity conservation planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.006
  43. Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., anthony, R., Humphires, C., Pressey, R. 1996. A comparision of richness hotsplots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of british birds, Conservation Biology, 10(1), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010155.x

Cited by

  1. Riparian Connectivity Assessment Using Species Distribution Model of Fish Assembly vol.23, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2015.23.2.017
  2. 전국자연환경조사를 활용한 포유류 서식지 유형의 분류 vol.26, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2017.26.2.160
  3. 전국자연환경조사 자료를 이용한 생물다양성 정량화의 적정공간단위 연구 vol.21, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.5.29
  4. 보호지역의 지정 및 관리를 위한 국립공원의 서식처 기능 평가 -생물종다양성과 서식처 가치에 기반하여- vol.21, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.5.39
  5. 한반도 기후변화 적응 대상 식물 종풍부도 변화 예측 연구 vol.27, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2018.27.6.562