DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of correlation between markers of ambient monitoring and biological monitoring of dimethylformamide for workers in synthetic leather manufacturing factories in Korea

국내 합성피혁제조업 근로자에 대한 디메틸포름아미드의 공기중 농도와 생물학적 노출지표간의 상관성 평가

  • Hwang, Yang In (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Young (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Chung, Yun Kyung (Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Eun A (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
  • 황양인 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 이미영 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 정윤경 (한림대학교병원) ;
  • 김은아 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2013.09.02
  • Accepted : 2013.09.30
  • Published : 2013.10.25

Abstract

The possibility of acute hepatotoxicity caused by dimethylformamide (DMF) requires regular monitoring of the workers who are using DMF to prevent the occupational disease. The authors performed ambient and biological monitoring of workers involved in synthetic leather manufacturing processes using DMF to assess the correlation between the markers of ambient and biological monitoring of DMF. The authors monitored 142 workers occupationally exposed to DMF from 19 workshops in the synthetic leather and ink manufacturing industries located in northern region of Gyeonggi-do. The subjects answered questionnaire on work procedure and use of personal protective equipment to be classified by exposure type. DMF in air samples collected using personal air samplers, diffusive and active sampler, was analysed using gas chromatograph-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) with DB-FFAP column (length 30 m, i.d. 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 ${\mu}m$). Urinary N-methylformamide (NMF) was analysed using gas chromatograph-mass selective detector (GC-MSD) at selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode with DB-624 column (length 60 m, i.d. 0.25 mm, film thickness 1.40 ${\mu}m$). Geometric mean (GM) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the ambient DMF was $6.85{\pm}3.43$ ppm, and GM and GSD of urinary NMF was $42.3{\pm}2.7$ mg/L. The ratio of subjects with DMF level over 10 ppm was 44%, and those with urinary NMF over 15 mg/L was 87%. NMF in urine adjusted by DMF in air was $4.61{\pm}2.57$ mg/L/ppm and $9.50{\pm}2.41$ mg/L/ppm, respectively, with or without respirator. There was seasonal differences of NMF in urine adjusted by DMF in air, $7.63{\pm}2.74$ mg/L/ppm in summer and $4.53{\pm}2.29$ mg/L/ppm in winter. The urinary NMF concentration which corresponds to 10 ppm of ambient DMF was 52.7 mg/L (r=0.650, n=128). Considering the difference of the route of exposure which resulted from the compliance of wearing personal protective equipment, the estimated contribution of respiratory and dermal exposure route for DMF was 48.5% vs. 51.5%.

Keywords

References

  1. S. K. Kim, S. J. Lee and K. C. Chung, Korean J. Occup. Environ. Med., 7(1), 186-190 (1995).
  2. Korea Occupational Health and Safety Agency (KOSHA). Study on the management and prevention of rapid poisoning of DMF handling workers, 6-12, 58-61 (2006).
  3. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure index, Cincinnati, 2013.
  4. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MoEL). Permissible exposure limit of hazardous subatance (MoEL Public Notice No. 2013-38) (2013).
  5. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure index, Cincinnati (1999).
  6. Korea Occupational Health and Safety Agency (KOSHA), Workers health examination guideline No. 1 - overview of specific health examination, 209-212 (2012).
  7. T. Sakei, H. Kageyama, T. Araki, T. Yosida, T. Kuribayashi et al., Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 67, 125-129 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572236
  8. R. R. Lauwerys, A. Kivits, M. Lhoir, P. Rigolet, D. Houbeau et al., Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 45, 189-203 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380783
  9. J. Mraz and H. Nohova, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 64, 79-83 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381473
  10. T. Nomiyama, H. Nakashima, L. L. Chen, S. Yamauchi, H. Miyauchi et al., Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 74, 224-228 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200000207
  11. S. K. Kang, J. Y. Jang, K. Y. Rhee and H. K. Chung, Korean J. Occup. Environ. Med., 3(1), 58-64 (1991).
  12. M. D. Joo, Y. D. Sohn and W. I. Choi, J. Korean Soc. Emerg. Med., 17(5), 515-518 (2006).
  13. H. K. Chung, S. K. Kang, K. Y. Rhee and J. Y. Jang, Korean J. Occup. Environ. Med., 4(2), 144-150 (1992).
  14. K. W. Kim, B. S. Choi, S. K. Kang and Y. H. Moon, J. Occup. Environ. Med., 11(1), 106-112 (1999).
  15. K. Y. Lee, J. H. Byeon, H. R. Song, J. H. Kim, K. W. Ko et al. Korean J. Occup. Environ. Med., 15(2), 162-172 (2003).
  16. I. S. Chung, J. G. Kim, S. K. Choi, J. Y. Bae and M. Y. Lee, Korean J. Prev. Med., 39(2), 171-176 (2006).
  17. S. J. Hur, C. H. Suh, C. K. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. T. Lee et al., J. Korean Soc. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 20(4), 225-235 (2010).
  18. S. W. Lee, T. H. Kim, J. M. Kim and J. C. Kim, J. Korean Soc. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 19(2), 113-126 (2009).
  19. Korea Occupational Health and Safety Agency (KOSHA). Survey report on the exposure and health impairment of dimethylformamide in korea, 53-92 (1999).
  20. H. C. Choi, G. Y. Kim, S. H. Ahn, Y. J. Lee and K. C. Chung, J. Korean Soc. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 11(2), 135-144 (2001).
  21. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition, The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1994).
  22. A. Fiorito, F. Larese, S. Molinari and T. Zanin, Am. J. Ind., 32, 244-260 (1997).
  23. J. Mraz and H. Nohova, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 64, 85-92 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381474
  24. J. Yonemoto and S. Sunuki, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ Health, 46, 159-165 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378194
  25. M. Imbriani, P. Marraccini, G. Saretto, L. Abatangelo, S. Ghittori et al., Med. Lav., 91(2), 114-124 (2000).
  26. V. S. Wang, T. S. Shih, C. C. Cheng, H. Y. Chang, J. S. Lai et al., J. Occup. Environ. Med., 46(7), 729-736 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000131795.88947.45
  27. J. S. Yang, E. A. Kim, M. Y. Lee, I. J. Park and S. K. Kang, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 73(7), 463-470 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200000168
  28. S. Baglioni, C. Cassinelli, G. Bongini, I. Cenni, N. Graziani, M. Landini, G. Tanturli, M. Brabec and P. Bavazzano, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 80(3), 228-33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0122-7

Cited by

  1. Analysis on Urinary N-methylformamide of Korean Workers according to Industrial Classification and Countermeasures for Exposure Control of N,N-dimethylformamide vol.24, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2014.24.3.345