Application of the Habitat Evaluation Procedure(HEP) for Legally Protected Wildbirds using Delphi Technique to Environmental Impact Assessment - In case of the Common Kestrel(Falco tinnunculus) in four areas (Paju, Siheung, Ansan, Hwaseong) -

델파이기법을 이용한 법적보호종 서식환경평가의 환경영향평가 적용방안 개발 - 파주시, 시흥시, 안산시, 화성시에서의 황조롱이를 대상으로 -

  • Lee, Seok-Won (Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Hae-ju Engineering) ;
  • Rho, Paikho (Department of Environmental Planning, Keimyung University) ;
  • Yoo, Jeong-Chil (Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 이석원 (해주엔지니어링(주) 부설 생태연구소) ;
  • 노백호 (계명대학교 환경계획학과) ;
  • 유정칠 (경희대학교 생물학과)
  • Received : 2013.05.13
  • Accepted : 2013.06.07
  • Published : 2013.06.30


This study was carried out to propose the new procedure to apply Habitat Evaluation Procedure(HEP) of target species using delphi technique, which is suitable to develop endangered species with few researches and ecological knowledges. To identify habitat quality of specific species in development project site, we can develop habitat model and create habitat suitability maps. In this study, we select the Common Kestrel(Falco tinnunculus) as target species in four areas(Paju, Siheung, Ansan, Hwaseong) which is located near the Seoul metropolitan area. The Delphi technique was selected to get the reliable information on the species and habitats requirements. Through the delphi approach, seven habitat components were determined as suitable variables for the Common Kestrel: density($n/km^2$) of small mammals, area($km^2$) of bare-grounds, pasturelands and riparian, and open area(%), spatial distribution and area of croplands, landscape diversity, breeding sites(tall trees, cliffs, high-rise buildings), and the length of shelf. Habitat variables used in this model were classified into two categories: % of suitable land-cover type(open areas, croplands, pasturelands, wetlands, and baregrounds) and the quality of feeding sites(within 250m from edges of woodlands). Habitat quality of the Common Kestrel was assessed against occurred sites derived from the nationwide survey. Predicted habitat suitability map were closely related to the observed sites of the endangered avian species in the study areas. With the habitat suitability map of the Common Kestrel, we assess the environmental impacts with habitat loss after development project in environmental impact assessment.


Supported by : 한국환경정책.평가연구원


  1. 강태한, 김성현, 진선덕, 조해진, 백운기, 2011, 조류에 의한 새만금 평가 연구, 한국조류학회지, 18(3), 181-189.
  2. 국토해양부, 2010, 도시계획현황.
  3. 권영한, 노태호, 이현우, 정흥락, 2006, 환경평가에 있어 생물다양성 항목의 도입방안, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  4. 김지연, 서창완, 권혁수, 류지은, 김명진, 2012, 전국자연환경조사 자료를 이용한 종분포모형 연구, 환경영향평가, 21(4), 593-607.
  5. 김지영, 강영현, 권영한, 김시헌, 노태호, 맹준호, 박영민, 송영일, 유헌석, 이수재, 이영수, 이영준, 이현우, 전인수, 정흥락, 조광우, 조승헌, 주현수, 최상기, 최재용, 최준규, 주용준, 박영재, 박준철, 서성철, 이정현, 채민정, 2002, 환경영향의 합리적 예측 평가를 위한 기법 연구, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  6. 노백호, 박해경, 2004, 경관생태학에 의한 야생 동.식물 서식공간 설정방안 연구, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  7. 노백호, 윤정호, 최준규, 이석원, 서현지, 2010, 법정보호 야생조류의 서식환경평가방안, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  8. 박시룡, 2010, 멸종위기I급 황새(Ciconia boyciana)의 야생복귀를 위한 기초 연구 및 서식지 조성 기술 개발, 한국환경산업기술원.
  9. 박종화, 이도원, 이우신, 2003, GIS를 이용한 야생동물 서식지 모형 개발: 설악산 국립공원을 대상으로, 한국과학재단 특정기초연구.
  10. 송영일, 서성철, 김시헌, 최준규, 한상욱. 2002. 사전환경성검토제도의 개선방안. 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  11. 신경희, 김지영, 노태호, 맹준호, 문난경, 선효성, 이희선, 조공장, 주용준, 최희선, 하주현, 임효숙, 2010, 택지 및 산업단지 개발사업의 환경평가 단계별 성과분석, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  12. 원병오, 1984, 한국의 새 - 천연기념물, 범양사 출판부.
  13. 원일재, 조삼래, 백충렬, 2005, 황조롱이(Falco tinnunculus)의 번식생태에 관한 연구, 한국조류학회지, 12(2), 61-68.
  14. 유병호, 조정웅, 김진한, 이대림, 1999, 우리나라 야생동물의 보호.관리 실태, 임업연구원.
  15. 이동근, 김은영, 이은재, 송원경, 2010, 개발사업에 따른 조류종 영향평가모형 개발 및 적용, 환경영향평가, 19(3), 347-356.
  16. 이현우, 정흥락, 노태호, 권영한, 김철환, 현진오, 장진수, 2005, 보호대상 식물종에 대한 환경영향평가기법 개선방안 연구, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  17. 정흥락, 이현우, 노태호, 권영한, 유헌석, 박소현, 2003, 경관생태학적 환경영향평가기법에 관한 연구, 한국환경정책.평가연구원 보고서.
  18. Aschwanden, J., S. Birrer and L. Jenni, 2005, Are ecological compensation areas attractive hunting sites for Common Kestrels(Falco tinnunculus) and Longeared Owl(Asio otus). Journal of Ornithology, 146, 279-286.
  19. Bissonette, J. A. and I. Storch, 2003, Landscape ecology and resource management: linking theory with practice. Island Press, Covelo, CA, USA.
  20. Costantini, D., S. Casagrande, G. Di Lieto, A. Fanfani and G. Dell'Omo, 2005, Consistent differences in feeding habits between neighbouring breeding kestrels. Behavioure, 142, 1409-1421
  21. Crance, J. H., 1987, Guidelines for using the Delphi technique to develop habitat suitability index curves. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report 82(10.134).
  22. Gil-Delgado, J. Verdejo and E. Barba, 1995, Nestling diet and fledgling production of Eurasian Kestrels(Falco tinnunculus) in eastern Spain. Journal of Raptor Research, 29(4), 240-244.
  23. Hengl, T., H. Sierdsema, A. Radovic, and A. Dilo, 2009, Spatial prediction of species distributions from occurrence - only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFZ and regression-kriging. Ecological Modelling, 220(24), 3499-3511.
  24. Korpimaki, E., 1985, Diet of the Kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the breeding season. Ornis Fennica, 62, 130-137.
  25. Korpimaki, E., 1986, Diet variation, hunting habitat and reproductive output of the Kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the light of the optimal diet theory. Ornis Fennica, 63, 84-90.
  26. MacMillan, D. C. and K. Marshall, 2005, The Delphi process - an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Animal Conservation, 9, 11-19.
  27. Orta, J., 1994, Common Kestrel. p. 259. In del Hoyo, J., A. Elliot. and J. Sargatal.(eds.). 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
  28. Riegert, J. F. Drahomira, M. Vaclav and F. Roman, 2007, How urban kestrels Falco tinnunculus divide their hunting grounds: partitioning or cohabitation. Acta Ornithologica, 42(1), 69-76.
  29. Riegert, J., M. Lovy and D. Fainova, 2009, Diet composition of Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus and Long-eared Owls Asio otus coexisting in an urban environment. Ornis Fennica, 86, 123-130.
  30. Valkama, J., E. Korpimaki and P. Tolonen, 1995, Habitat utilization, diet and reproductive success in the Kestrel in a temporally and spatially heterogeneous environment. Ornis Fennica, 72, 49-61.
  31. Village, A., 1990, The Kestrel. T & AD Poyser, London. UK.
  32. Wheater, C. P., 2002, Urban Habitats. Routledge, New York, USA.
  33. Yalden, D. W., 1980, Notes on the diet of urban kestrels. Bird Study, 27(4), 235-238.
  34. Zmihorski, M. and L. Rejt, 2007, Weatherdependent variation in the cold-season diet of urban kestrels Falco tinnunculus. Acta Ornithologica, 42(1), 107-113.
  35. 日本野鳥會, 1994, 第4回自然環境保全基礎調査 動植物分布調査報告書(鳥類の集団繁殖地及び集団ねぐら) - チョウゲンボウの集団繁殖地の現状と動向. 環境聽自然保護局.