DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Uterine Bacteria to Increase Reproductive Efficiency in Hanwoo(Korean Native Cattle)

한우의 번식 효율 향상을 위한 자궁 내 세균 분석

  • Park, Joung-Jun (Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology Center (ARBC)) ;
  • Yoo, Han-Jun (Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology Center (ARBC)) ;
  • Cho, Young-Jae (College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Won (Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology Center (ARBC)) ;
  • Yoon, Pil-Sang (Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology Center (ARBC)) ;
  • Lee, Seon-Goo (College of Oriental Medicine, Sangji University) ;
  • Jung, Bae-Dong (College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hahn, Tae-Wook (College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2013.02.28
  • Accepted : 2013.03.08
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate several types of uterine bacteria in Hanwoo. uterine bacteria from randomly selected 5 uterus was collected by flushing methods into a sterilized 1.5 ml centrifuge tube and was inoculated onto MacConkey agar and blood agar, respectively. After being incubated for 5% $CO_2$, aerobic or anaerobic condition at $37^{\circ}C$ during 48h, bacterial colonies were selected and re-inoculated onto blood agar plates. Re-cultured colonies were identified by Gram staining and finally identified using Vitek system. The identified bacteria were Staphylococcus lentus, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus vitulinus, Staphylococcus warneri of Gram (+) and Rhizobium radiobacter, Sphingomonas paucimobilis of Gram (-) bacteria. Although, pathogenicity of identified bacteria was unclear, the bacteria can have an effect on the uterine microenvironment. Therefore, repetitive research will be required to determine the effects of bacteria in cattle exposed to a various environment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 농림수산식품부

References

  1. Althouse GC, Kuster CE, Clark SG and Weisiger RM. 2000. Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 53:1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00261-2
  2. Althouse GC and Lu KG. 2005. Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63:573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.031
  3. Althouse GC, Pierdon MS and Lu KG. 2008. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 70:1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010
  4. Barigye P, Schaan L, Gibbs SP, Schamber Ev and Dyer NW. 2007. Diagnostic evidence of Staphylococcus warneri as a possible cause of bovine abortion. J. Vet. Diag. Invest. 6:694-696.
  5. Bartlett PC, Kirk JH and Mather EG. 1986. Repeated insemination in Michigan Holstein Friesian cattle: incidence descriptive epidermiology and estimated economic impact. Theriogenology 26:309-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(86)90150-0
  6. Blumberg DA and Cherry JD. 1989. Agrobacterium radiobacter and CDC group Ve-2 bacteremia. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12:351-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(89)90102-8
  7. Bonnett BN, Martin SW and Meek AH. 1993. Associations of clinical findings, bacteriological and histological results of endometrial biopsy with reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 15:205-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(93)90114-9
  8. Bulma DC and Lamming GE. 1978. Milk progesterone levels in relation to conception, repeat breeding and factors influencing acyclicity in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. 54:447-458. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0540447
  9. Coffelt SB, Hughes R and Lewis CE. 2009. Tumor-associated macrophages: effectors of angiogenesis and tumor progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1796:11-18.
  10. Edmond MB, Riddler SA, Baxter CM, Wichklund BM and Pasculle AW. 1993. Agrobacterium radiobacter: a recently recognized opportunistic pathogen. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16:388-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/clind/16.3.388
  11. Easley GT, Leonard RH and Trotter DM. 1951. Bacteriological, pathological & clinical studies of reproductive tract of the Hereford cow and a bacteriological study of Hereford bull semen. N. AM. Vet. 32:258-265.
  12. Eggert-Kruse W, Pohl S, Naher H, Tilgen W and Runnebaum B. 1992. Microbial colonization and sperm-mucus interaction: results in 1000 infertile couples. Hum. Reprod. 7:612-620. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137706
  13. Gunter JJ, Collings WJ, Owen J, Sorenson AM, Scales WJ and Alford JA. 1955. A survey of the bacteria in the reproductive tract of dairy animals and their relationship to infertility. Am. J. Vet. Res. 16:282.290.
  14. Ilievski V, Lu SJ and Hirsch E. 2007. Activation of toll-like receptors 2 or 3 and preterm delivery in the Mouse. Reprod. Sci. 14:315-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719107302959
  15. Kajikawa S, Kaga N, Futamura Y, Kakinuma C and Shibutani Y. 1998. Lipoteichoic acid induces preterm delivery in mice. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 39:147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8719(98)00015-X
  16. Kim M, Heo SR, Choi SH, Kwon H, Park JS, Seong MW, Lee DH, Park KU, Song J and Kim EC. 2008. Comparison of the MicroScan, VITEC 2, and Crystal GP with 16S rRNA sequencing and MicroSeq 500 v2.0 analysis for coagulase-negative Staphylococci. BMC Microbiology. 8:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-233
  17. Kimura MT, Nakao and Moriyoshi M. 1987. Luteal phase deficiency as a possible cause of repeat breeding in dairy cows. Br. Vet. J. 143:560-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(87)90047-9
  18. Koga K, Cardenas I, Aldo P, Abrahams VM, Peng B, Fill S, Romero R and Mor G. 2009. Activation of TLR3 in the trophoblast is associated with preterm delivery. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 61:196-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00682.x
  19. Mastoianni A, Coronado O, Nanetti A, Manfredi R and Chiodo F. 1996. Agrobacterium radiobacter pneumonia in a patient with HIV infection [letter]. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:960-963. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690519
  20. Miller HV, Kimsey PB, Kendrick JW, Darien B, Doering L, Franti C and Horton J. 1980. Endometritis of dairy cattle: diagnosis, treatment and fertility. Bovine. Pract. 5:13-23.
  21. Moss LH, Epstein E and Logan TL. 2002. Evaluating risks and benefits of soil amendments used in agriculture. Report. 99-PUM-1. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation.
  22. Plotkin GR. 1980. Agrobacterium radiobacter prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann. Intern. Med. 93:839-840.
  23. Rodby RA and Click EJ. 1991. Agrobacterium radiobacter peritonitis in two patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 1991:402-405.
  24. Sader HS, Biedenbach D and Jones RN. 1995. Evaluation of vitek and API20S for species identification of Enterococci. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:315-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(95)00146-5
  25. Sone M, Ohmura K and Bamba K. 1982. Effects of various antibiotics on the control of bacteria in boar semen. Vet. Rec. 111:11-14. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.111.1.11
  26. Studer E and Morrow DA. 1978. Postpartum evaluation of bovine reproductive potential: comparison of findings from genital tract examination per rectum uterine culture and endometrial biopsy. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 172:489-494.
  27. Swanson LV and Young AJ. 1990. Failure of gonadotropinreleasing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin to enhance the fertility of repeat-breeder cows when administered at the time of insemination. Theriogenology. 34:955-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90564-A
  28. Tamuli MK, Sharma DK and Rajkonwar CK. 1984. Studies on the microbial flora of boar semen. Indian. Vet. J. 61:858-861.
  29. Thaxton JE, Romero R and Sharma S. 2009. TLR9 activation coupled to IL-10 deficiency induces adverse pregnancy outcomes. J. Immunol. 183:1144-1154. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0900788
  30. Wang H and Hirsch E. 2003. Bacterially-induced preterm labor and regulation of prostaglandin-metabolizing enzyme expression in mice: the role of toll-like receptor 4. Biol. Reprod. 69:1957-1963. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.019620
  31. 김학영, 송상현, 조헌조. 2002. 한우 번식우 농가의 번식실태 및 번식 장애 치료에 관한 연구. 한국가축번식학회지. 26:291-298.
  32. 김희석, 신원집, 서국성, 김중계, 백순용, 이근상. 1981. 한우의 번식 장애 발생 요인에 관한 연구. 축산시험연구보서. pp. 72.
  33. 박춘근, 홍기훈, 이용승, 한태욱. 2008. 돼지 정액내의 오염 세균의 동정 및 오염된 세균의 제거. 한국가축위생학회지. 31(4):547-553.
  34. 백광수, 성환후, 고응규, 이명식, 류일선, 강희설, 조원모, 신기준. 1997. 한우 암소의 번식 장애에 관한 조사연구. 한국가축번식학회지. 21:411-421.
  35. 변명대, 조헌조. 1973. 한우 번식 장애의 실태에 관한 조사연구. 한국축산학회지. 15:114-118.
  36. 이미애, 박향숙, 김선주, 김의종. 2001. 장내세균 동정을 위한 EASY 24 plus, API 20E 및 VITEK System의 비교 평가. 대한임상미생물학회지. 4(2):96-101.
  37. 이용빈, 임경순. 1982. 도살우의 번식장애사례 조사연구. 한국가축번식학회지. 6:19-30.
  38. 이진희. 1969. 유우 번식장해의 발생실태에 관한 조사연구. 한국축산학회지. 11:323-331.
  39. 유재원, 조규호, 홍준기, 김명직, 박준철, 정일병, 김인철. 2008. 돼지 액상정액 내 세균오염과 항생제 감수성에 관한 연구. 한국동물자원과학회지. 50:793-783.
  40. 임영일, 정창국. 1984. 협동동물병원의 유우질병에 대한 년간 조사분석. 한국임상수의학회지. 1(1):25-40.
  41. 조성우, 김용준, 이해이, 김용수. 2001. 젖소 번식장애 주요 유형별 치료방법에 관한 연구. 한국가축번식학회지. 25:207-217.