DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis for External Cost of Nuclear Power Focusing on Additional Safety and Accident Risk Costs

추가안전대책비용, 사고위험대응비용의 외부비용을 반영한 원전비용 추정 연구

  • Kim, Yoon Kyung (Department of Economics, College of Social Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Jin (Nuclear Power Policy Research Division, Energy Policy Research Group, Korea Energy Economics Institute)
  • 김윤경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 경제학전공) ;
  • 조성진 (에너지경제연구원 원자력정책연구실)
  • Received : 2013.04.03
  • Accepted : 2013.06.17
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

After the Fukushima nuclear accident, the external costs of generating electricity from nuclear power plants such as additional safety compliance costs and possible accident risk action costs have gained increasing attention from the public, policy-makers and politicians. Consequently, estimates of the external costs of nuclear power are very deliberate issue that is at the center of the controversy in Korea. In this paper, we try to calculate the external costs associated with the safety of the nuclear power plants, particularly focusing on additional safety compliance costs and possible accident risk action costs. To estimate the possible accident risk action costs, we adopt the damages expectation approach that is very similar way from the external cost calculation of Japanese government after the Fukushima accident. In addition, to estimate additional safety compliance costs, we apply the levelized cost of generation method. Furthermore, we perform the sensitivity analysis to examine how much these social costs increase the electricity price rate. Estimation results of the additional security measure cost is 0.53Won/kWh ~ 0.80Won/kWh depending on the capacity factor, giving little change on the nuclear power generation cost. The estimates of possible accident risk action costs could be in the wide range depending on the different damages of the nuclear power accident, probability of the severe nuclear power accident and the capacity factor. The preliminary results show that it is 0.0025Won/kWh ~ 26.4188Won/kWh. After including those two external costs on the generation cost of a nuclear power plant, increasing rate of electricity price is 0.001%~10.0563% under the capacity factor from 70% to 90%. This paper tries to examine the external costs of nuclear power plants, so as to include it into the generation cost and the electricity price. This paper suggests one of the methodologies that we might internalize the nuclear power generations' external cost, including it into the internal generation cost.

후쿠시마원자력발전소의 사고를 계기로 원전의 안전대책비용, 사고위험대응비용과 같은 외부비용들의 존재가 부각되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 원전의 외부비용들 중에서 추가안전대책비용과 사고위험대응비용을 추정하고, 이를 발전원가 및 전기요금에 반영하여 변화정도를 살폈다. 원전의 추가안전대책비용은 70~90%의 이용률에서 0.53원/kWh~0.80원/kWh으로 원전의 발전원가에 큰 영향을 미치지는 않는다. 사고위험대응비용은 원전사고피해규모별, 사고발생빈도별, 이용률별로 0.0025원/kWh~26.4188원/kWh로 추정되었다. 사고위험대응비용을 포함시키면 원전발전원가는 47.58원/kWh~85.92원/kWh가 된다. 2011년을 기준으로 사고위험대응비용을 내부화한 경우의 전기요금의 증가율은 70~90%의 이용률에서 0.001%~10.0563% 로 추정되었다. 본 연구는 원전의 외부비용을 내부화하는 방법으로서 외부비용을 발전원가에 포함하여 전기요금에 반영하였다. 본 연구는 지금까지 우리나라에 논의되지 않았던 원전 외부비용을 내부화하는 방법의 하나가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 경기개발연구원, 2000, "21C 경기대기보전 실천계획", 보고서 www.golibrary.go.kr/ elec/original/original_detail_view.jsp?isbn=DC00100321.
  2. 경기개발연구원, 2003, "경기도지역 대기오염의 사회적 비용 추정 및 적정 수준 달성 방안", 보고서.
  3. 김형준, 2006, "지속가능한 에너지 체제 관점에서의 천연가스와 원자력 발전의 비교", 원자력산업 6월호, p.66-76.
  4. 에너지경제연구원, 2012, "다목적댐 수력발전 가치평가", 용역보고서.
  5. 전력거래소, 2012, <한국전력통계> 제 81호(2012. 6).
  6. 전상일, 1999, "서울시 대기오염이 건강에 미치는 영향과 질병비용에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 보건대학교 보건학박사학위논문.
  7. 정성호, 배득종, 정창훈, 2011, "사회적 한계비용을 고려한 화력발전과세 확대에 관한 연구", 지방행정연구, 제25권 제4호(통권 87호), pp. 259-284.
  8. 조준모, 유완식, 1996, "대기오염으로 인한 경제적 비용.편익 분석에 관한 연구", 숭실경영경제연구, Vol. 26, pp. 463-490.
  9. 지식경제부, 2012, '원전사후처리 비용 대폭 현실화', 보도자료 2012년 12월 28일자.
  10. 지식경제부, 2013, <제 6차 전력수급계획>, 보도자료, 2013년 2월 22일자 www.mke.go.kr/ mke/brd2_view.jsp?seq=77757&pageNo=1&srchType=1&srchWord=&pCtx=1.
  11. 한국수력원자력, 2011, 2012, 뉴스레터 제 154호(2011. 6. 3), 제 170호(2012. 2. 2).
  12. 한국전력공사, 1997, "전력산업의 사회적 비용에 관한 연구", 최종보고서, 한국전력 공사 전원계획처.
  13. 한국환경정책평가연구원, 2000, "환경문제를 고려한 천연가스의 경제성 평가 및 보급 활성화 방안연구", 최종보고서, webbook.me.go.kr/DLi-File/023/35945.pdf.
  14. 현대경제연구원, 2012, "원전 드러나지 않은 비용", 보고서, 2012년 11월 1일자.
  15. エネルギー環境会議, 2010, "事故リスクへの対応コストについて", 平成22年度実績.エネルギー環境会議資料 資料4.
  16. 経済産業省, 2011, "東京電力株式会社福島第一, 第二原子力発電所事故による原子力損 害の範囲の判定等に関する中間指針", 2011년 8월 5일.
  17. 原子力委員会, 2011, "原子力発電の全諸元および諸元データの参考情報", 資料2.
  18. 原子力委員会, 2011, "追加的安全対策費用について", 資料2-1.
  19. 原子力委員会 コスト等検証委員会, 2011, "コスト等検証委員会報告書", 2011년 12월 13일.
  20. 原子力損害賠償紛争解決センター, 2012, "活動状況報告書― 初期段階(9-12月)にお ける状況について―(概況報告と総括)", 2012년 1월 30일, p. 2, www.mext.go.jp/ component/a_menu/science/anzenkakuho/micro_detail/_icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/02/16/1 316600_1_1_1.pdf.
  21. 東京電力株式会社, 2011, "東京電力に関する経営.財務調査委員会報告書", 2011년 10 월 3일.
  22. 内閣府 原子力政策担当室, 2011, "原子力発電所の事故リスクコスト試算の考え方", 平成23年 10月 13日, 技術等検討小委員会第2回 資料 第1号.
  23. CASES(Cost Assessment of Sustainable Energy Systems), 2008a, "Review of literature on national estimates of private and external costs of electricity generation in European countries," Report, Project No. 518294 SES6, www.feem-project.net/cases/ documents/deliverables/D_06_1%20part2%2008_09.pdf.
  24. CASES, 2008b, "Development of a set of full cost estimates of the use of different energy sources and its comparative assessment in EU countries: Part I. Review of Literature on National Estimates of Private And External Costs of Electricity Generation in European Countries," Report, Project No. 518294 SES6, www.feemproject. net/cases/documents/deliverables/D_06_1%20part1%20final.pdf.
  25. CASES, 2008c,"Development of a set of full cost estimates of the use of different energy sources and its comparative assessment in EU countries: Part II. Full cost: Levelised European estimates results and assesment," Report, Project No. 518294 SES6, www.feem-project.net/cases/documents/deliverables/D_06_1%20part2%2008_09.pdf.
  26. EU European Commission, 2003, "External Costs: Research results on socioenvironmental damages due to electricity and transport(EXTERN E project)," Community research, final report.
  27. EUSUSTEL, 2006, "European Sustainable Electricity; Comprehensive Analysis of Future European Demand and Generation of European Electricity and its Security of Supply," no.006602, Final Technical Report, www.eusustel.be/public/documents_publ /Final%20Technical% 20Report.pdf.
  28. EUSUSTEL, 2007, "The European Union, 25 different countries, 25 different energy policies: An overview," Report, European Sustainable Electricity; Comprehensive Analysis of Future European Demand and Generation of European Electricity and its Security of Supply, eurelectric and VGB PowerTech www.eusustel.be/results.php.
  29. Gagnon, L., 2003, "The cost range chosen for hydraulics measures inclusion or not of a vast reservoir," Revue de l'Energie, no.546.
  30. Holland, M. R., P. Watkiss., 2002, "Benefits Table database: Estimates of the marginal external costs of air pollution in Europe BeTa version E1.02a," Report, Created for European Commission DG Environment, europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ enveco/air/betaec02aforprinting.pdf.
  31. Krupnick., A. J. D. Burtraw, 1996, "The Social Costs of Electricity: Do the Numbers Add Up?," Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 96-30, www.rff.org/Documents/ RFF-DP-96-30.pdf.
  32. OECD IEA, 2010, "Projected costs of generating Electricity"2010 Update
  33. OECD REN 21, 2012, "The True Cost of Electric Power," Report, Summary for Policymakers, new.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/RFF-Rpt-BurtrawKrupnick.TrueCosts_ Summary_web.pdf.
  34. Rowe, R. D., C. M. Lang, L. G. Chestnut, D. A. Latlmer, D. A. Rae, S. M. Bernow, D. E. White, 1995, "New York State Environmental Externalities Cost Study," Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation.