자원ㆍ환경경제연구 (Environmental and Resource Economics Review)

한국자원경제학회 (Korean Resource Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

화석에너지와 CO2배출량 규제 하의 경제와 환경의 효율성 분석

Analysis of the Economy and Environment Efficiencies under the Regulation of Fossil Fuel and Carbon Dioxide Emission

  • 강상목 (부산대학교 경제통상대학 경제학과) ;
  • 조단 (부산대학교 경제통상대학 경제학과)
  • Kang, Sangmok (Department of Economics, Pusan National University) ;
  • Zhao, Dan (Department of Economics, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.02
  • 심사 : 2013.05.28
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 2000-2009년 국가별로 환경과 화석에너지의 제약 하에서 경제와 환경의 효율을 측정하고자 함이다. 본 연구는 국가별 소득수준에 따른 OECD국가, 중고소득국가, 저소득국가 등 세 그룹으로 구분하여, 생산가능집합에서 바람직한 산출물인 GDP와 오염물을 동시에 포함한 '환경지향형, 경제지향형, 환경-경제지향형, Two-stage DEA모형' 등의 네 가지 방법을 제시하여 비교한다. OECD국가는 상대적으로 경제효율성이 높으나 환경효율성은 낮았고 비OECD국가는 환경효율성이 높고 경제효율성이 낮았다. 화석에너지와 온실가스의 저감의 여지는 OECD국가가 더 높았다.

The purpose of this paper is to measure economy and environment efficiencies under fossil fuel and environment regulation by countries for 2000-2009. Distinguishing 83 countries with three groups of OECD, upper-middle, and low countries, we compare four models such as environment oriented, economy-oriented, environment-economy oriented, and two-stage types, which include a desirable output, GDP and an undesirable output, pollutant together in the production possibility set. OECD countries relatively showed high economy efficiency and low environment efficiency, whereas Non-OECD countries showed high environment efficiency and low economy efficiency. OECD countries reported a higher possibility to reduce fossil fuel and $CO_2$ emission.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강상목.정영근.이명헌, 2011.6, "지속가능성장 모형구축과 지속가능성 계측", <환경 정책>제19권 제2호, pp.35-66.
  2. 정영근.강상목.이준, 2008, "OECD국가의 환경-경제효율성 비교", <자원.환경경제 연구> 제17권 제1호, pp. 121-148.
  3. Boyd, G.A. and J.D.McClelland, 1999, "The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.38, pp.121-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1082
  4. Chung Y.R., Fare, R., and S.Grosskopf, 1997, "Productivity and Undesirable Output: A Directional Distance Function Approach," Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.51, pp.229-240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
  5. Fare, R., and S. Grosskopf, 2004, New Direction: Efficiency and Productivity, Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston.
  6. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and C.A.Pasurka Jr., 2007, "Environmental Production Functions and Environmental Directional Distance Functions," Energy Economics, Vol.32, pp.1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.005
  7. Fei, L,Dong, Suo cheng, and L.Xue, 2011, "Energy Consumption-Economic Growth Relationship and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China," Energy Policy, Vol.39, Issue 2, pp.568-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.025
  8. Fosund, F. R., 2009, "Good Modeling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.3, pp.1-38. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000021
  9. Kumar, S., 2006, "Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index," Ecological Economics, Vol.56, pp.280-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.02.004
  10. Lo, S.F., Sheu, H.J., and J.L. Hu, 2005, "Taking $CO_2$ Emissions into a Country's Productivity Change: the Asian Growth Experience," International Journal of Sustainable Development and World, Vol.12, pp.279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500509469638
  11. Lozano, S. and E. Gutierrez, 2008, "Non-parametric Frontier Approach to Modelling the Relationships among Population, GDP, Energy Consumption and $CO_2$ Emission," Ecological Economics, Vol.66, pp.687-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.003
  12. Mandal., S.K., 2010, "Do Undesirable Output and Environmental Regulation Matter in Energy Efficiency Analysis? Evidence from Indian Cement Industry," Energy Policy, Vol.38, pp.6076-6083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.063
  13. Wang, Q., Zhou, P., and Zhou, D., 2012, "Efficiency Measurement with Carbon Dioxide Emissions: The case of China," Applied Economics, Vol.90, pp.161-166.
  14. Zaim, O., and F. Taskin, 2000a, "Environmental Efficiency in Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the OECD: A Non-parametric Approach," Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.58, pp.95-107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0312
  15. Zaim, O.,and F. Taskin, 2000b, "A Kuznets Curve in Environmental Efficiency: an Application on OECD Countries," Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.17, pp.21-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008318605976
  16. Zhou, P., Poh, K.L., and B.W. Ang, 2007a, "A Non-radial DEA Approach to Measuring Environmental Performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.178, pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.038
  17. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., and K.L.Poh, 2007b, "A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.189, pp.1-18.
  18. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., and K.L. Poh, 2008, "Measuring Environmental Performance under Different Environmental DEA Technologies," Energy Economics, Vol.30, pp.1-14.
  19. Zofio, J.L. and A.M. Prieto, 2001, "Environmental Efficiency and Regulatory Standards: the Case of $CO_2$ Emissions from OECD Countries," Resource and Energy Economics, Vol.23, pp.63-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00030-0