DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Unusual Enhancements of NmF2 in Anyang Ionosonde Data

  • Received : 2013.07.25
  • Accepted : 2013.08.22
  • Published : 2013.12.15

Abstract

Sudden enhancements of daytime NmF2 appeared in Anyang ionosonde data during summer seasons in 2006-2007. In order to investigate the causes of this unusual enhancement, we compared Anyang NmF2's with the total electron contents (GPS TECs) observed at Daejeon, and also with ionosonde data at at mid-latitude stations. First, we found no similar increase in Daejeon GPS TEC when the sudden enhancements of Anyang NmF2 occurred. Second, we investigated NmF2's observed at other ionosonde stations that use the same ionosonde model and auto-scaling program as the Anyang ionosonde. We found similar enhancements of NmF2 at these ionosonde stations. Moreover, the analysis of ionograms from Athens and Rome showed that there were sporadic-E layers with high electron density during the enhancements in NmF2. The auto-scaling program (ARTIST 4.5) used seems to recognize sporadic-E layer echoes as a F2 layer trace, resulting in the erroneous critical frequency of F2 layer (foF2). Other versions of the ARTIST scaling program also seem to produce similar erroneous results. Therefore we conclude that the sudden enhancements of NmF2 in Anyang data were due to the misrecognition of sporadic-E echoes as a F-layer by the auto-scaling program. We also noticed that although the scaling program flagged confidence level (C-level) of an ionogram as uncertain when a sporadic-E layer occurs, it still automatically computed erroneous foF2's. Therefore one should check the confidence level before using long term ionosonde data that were produced by an auto-scaling program.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim EJ, Chung JK, Kim YH, Jee GH, Hong SH, et al., A climatology study on ionospheric F2 peak over Anyang, Korea, EPS, 63, 335-349 (2011). http://dx.doi. org/10.5047/eps.2011.03.011
  2. Pezzopane M, Scotto C, Automatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 and MUF (3000) F2: A comparison between Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 on Rome data, Radio Science, 42, RS4003 (2007). http://dx.doi. org/10.1029/2006RS003581
  3. Piggott WR, Rawer K, World data center A for solar- Terrestrial Physics U.R.S.I Handbook of ionogram interpretation and reduction (Boulder, Colorado, World Data Center A for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 1972).
  4. Prasad SNVS, Prasad DSVVD, Venkatesh K, Niranjan K, Rao PVSR, Diurnal and seasonal variations in sporadic E-layer (Es layer) occurrences over equatorial, low and mid latitude stations - A comparative study, Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics, 41, 26-38 (2012).
  5. Reinisch BW, Digisonde 4D Technical manual (Lowell, Massachusetts, Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2009).
  6. Rishbeth H, How the thermospheric circulation affects the ionospheric F2-layer, JASTP, 60, 1385-1402 (1998).
  7. Rishbeth H, Muller-Wodarg ICF, Why is there more ionosphere in January than in July? The annual asymmetry in the F2-layer, Ann. Geophys, 24, 3293- 3311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3293-2006
  8. Smith EK, Temporal and world-wide variations of sporadic E, AGARDograph, 34, 1-22 (1958).
  9. Thomas JA, Smith EK, A Survey of the present knowledge of sporadic-E ionization, Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 13, 295-314 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(59)90121-7

Cited by

  1. Statistics of Ionospheric Storms Using GPS TEC Measurements Between 2002 and 2014 in Jeju, Korea vol.32, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.335
  2. Vertical Scale Height of the Topside Ionosphere Around the Korean Peninsula: Estimates from Ionosondes and the Swarm Constellation vol.32, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.311