DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Functional Shock Responses of the Pear According to the Combination of the Packaging Cushioning Materials

포장완충재의 구성에 따른 배의 단일파형 충격반응

  • Kim, Ghi-Seok (Division of Bioresources Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Min (Division of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Man-Soo (Division of Bioresources Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2010.08.26
  • Accepted : 2010.10.01
  • Published : 2010.10.25

Abstract

Physical damages on fruits may be caused by shock and vibration inputs that transmitted from the transporting vehicle through the packaging and cushioning materials to the fruit. In this study, both half sine shock test and trapezoidal shock test were performed by MIL-STD-810F specification in order to investigate and represent the shock response properties such as peak acceleration and shock amplification factors of the pear according to packaging and cushioning materials for optimal packaging design during transportation. Shock excitation data that had been measured on the vehicle operating on the real road were used. Shock response properties measured by half sine shock test were smaller than those measured by trapezoidal shock test. Results represent that corrugation shapes and thickness can significantly affect the cushioning performance than the paper configurations of cushioning pad and showed that fruits may be damaged seriously while transported on the unpaved road without the properly cushioned packaging practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Delwiche, M. J., H. Arevalo and J. J. Mehlschau. 1996. Second generation impact force response fruit firmness sorter. Transactions of the ASAE, 39(3):1025-1033. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27592
  2. Diener, R. G., R. E. Adams, M. Ingle, K. C. Elliot, P. E. Nesselroad and S. H. Blizzard. 1977. Bruise Energy of Peaches and Apples. ASAE Paper No. 77-1029, ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich.
  3. Hong, J. H., B. S. Myung, J. S. Choe, C. S. Kim, T. W. Kim, J. H. Chung and J. W. Park. 2005. Mechanical Behavior of Fruits under Impact Loading. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 30(5):274-279. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2005.30.5.274
  4. Kim, G. S. 2007. Vibration Behavior of the Fruits and the Packaged Freight and their Quality Changes at Simulated Transportation Environment. Chungnam National University Doctor Dissertation.
  5. Lee, Y. H., D. S. Choi, S. R. Choi, M. S. Kim and G. S. Kim. 2008. Firmness Measurement of Melon by Characteristics of Impact Signal (I) - Characteristics of Impact Signal of Melon -. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 33(4):239-247. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2008.33.4.239
  6. Lichtensteiger, M. J., R. G. Holmes, M. Y. Hamdy and J. L. Blaisdell, 1988. Impact parameters of spherical viscoelastic objects and tomatoes, Transactions of the ASAE 31(2):595-602.
  7. MIL-STD-810F. 2000. Department of Defense Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests, U.S.A
  8. Mohsenin, N. N. 1970. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers
  9. Mohsenin, N. N. and H. Goehlich. 1962. Techniques for determination of mechanical properties of fruits and vegetables as related to design and development of harvesting and processing machinery. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 7(4), 300-315.
  10. Park, I. K. 2001. Impact characteristics of the pears. Chungnam National University Master Dissertation.
  11. Zhang, X., M. L. Stone, D. Chen, N. O. Maness, and G. H. Brusewitz. 1994. Peach firmness determination by puncture resistance, drop impact, and sonic impulse. Transaction of the ASAE 37(2):495-500. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28103

Cited by

  1. Effects of Vibration Stress on the Quality of Packaged Apples during Simulated Transport vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.1.044
  2. Effects of Vibration Fatigue on Compression Strength of Corrugated Fiberboard Containers for Packaging of Fruits during Transport vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.1.051