DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생리식염수 세척이 구강 소독제의 타액 내 세균 수의 변화에 미치는 영향

Effect of saline irrigation used in combination with antimicrobial agents on salivary bacterial counts

  • 김동주 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 유경환 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 임형섭 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이성규 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김학균 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Kim, Dong-Joo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yu, Kyoung-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Hyong-Sub (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Kyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2010.04.05
  • 심사 : 2010.05.24
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of mechanical irrigation in combination with mouthwash of antimicrobial agents on salivary bacterial counts. Materials and Methods: This study was performed with a randomized study employing a panel of 40 healthy volunteers (20 males and 20 females) between the age of 26 and 32 years. Volunteers were randomly put in one of four treatment groups. In the first group, 0.2 mL of non-stimulatory saliva was collected from every subjective person. Then, saliva was collected after rinsing with chlorhexidine (CHX) for 1 minute. In the second group, non-stimulatory saliva was collected, and then saliva was collected after rinsing with CHX and irrigation with saline. In the third and fourth groups, the same procedures as the first and second groups were performed with povidone iodine (PVI) instead of CHX. All of these samples were cultured for 48 hours aerobically. The reduction rates of colony-forming units (CFU) were calculated for each group. The reduction rate between each group was tested statistically using student t-test. Results: Using CHX in combination with saline irrigation showed a significant decrease of the salivary bacterial CFU when compared with only using CHX.(P<0.01) And using PVI with saline irrigation showed a little decrease of the CFU when compared with only using PVI, but there was no statistical significance.(P>0.01) Conclusion: It was concluded that the CHX or PVI used with saline irrigation made the salivary bacterial counts reduced more than when CHX or PVI was used alone as an oral antiseptic agent.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Addy M, Jenkins S, Newcombe R. The effect of some chlorhexidine- containing mouthrinses on salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:90-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01694.x
  2. Grossman E, Meckel AH, Isaacs RL, Ferretti GA, Sturzenberger OP, Bollmer BW, et al. A clinical comparison of antibacterial mouthrinses: effect of chlorhexidine. phenolics and sanguinarine on dental plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol 1989;60:435-40. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.8.435
  3. Santos A. Evidence-based control of plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30(Suppl 5):13-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.30.s5.5.x
  4. Tomas I, Alvarez M, Limeres J, Tomas M, Medina J, Otero JL, et al. Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthwash on the risk of postextraction postextraction bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:577- 82. https://doi.org/10.1086/516663
  5. Herrera D, Roldan S, Santacruz I, Santos S, Masdevall M, Sanz M. Differences in anti- microbial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial count study. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30:307-14. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00341.x
  6. Shelanski HA, Shelanski MV. PVP-iodine: history, toxicity and therapeutic uses. J Int Coll Surg 1956;25:727-34.
  7. Nagatake T, Ahmed K, Oishi K. Prevention of respiratory infections by povidone-iodine gargle. Dermatology 2002;204(Suppl 1):32-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057722
  8. Matsumoto K. Respiratory infections-pathogenesis of acute and chronic infections. Kekkaku. 1996;71:477-94.
  9. Rahn R, Adamietz IA, Boettcher HD, Schaefer V, Reimer K, Fleischer W. Povidone-iodine to prevent mucositis in patients during antineoplastic radiochemotherapy. Dermatology 1997; 195(Suppl 2):527-34.
  10. Kim SY, Noh KP, Kim HK, Kim SG, Kook JK, Park SN, et al. Salivary bacterial counts after application of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;35: 312-5.
  11. Chaves ES, Kornman KS, Manwell MA, Jones AA, Newbold DA, Wood RC. Mechanism of irrigation effects on gingivitis. J Periodontol 1994;65:1016-21. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.11.1016
  12. Francetti L, del Fabbro M, Testori WT, Weinstein RL. Chlorhexidine spray versus chlorhexidine mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:425-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027006425.x
  13. Gjermo, P. Chlorhexidine in dental practice. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:143-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01250.x
  14. Davies RM, Jensen SB, Schiott CR, Loe H. The effect of topical application of chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization of the teeth and gingiva. J Periodontal Res 1970;5:96-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1970.tb00699.x
  15. Shiloah J, Hovious LA. The role of subgingival irrigations in the treatment of periodontitis. J Periodontol 1993;64:835-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.835
  16. Santos S, Herrera D, Lopez E, O Connor A, Gonzalez I, Sanz M. A randomized clinical trial on the short-term clinical and microbiological effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.05% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for patients in supportive periodontal care. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00438.x
  17. Gershenfeld L. Povidone iodine as topical antiseptic. Am J Surg 1957;94:938-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(57)90086-7
  18. Adamietz IA, Rahn R, B¨ottcher HD, Sch¨afer V, Reimer K, Fleischer W. Prophylaxis with povidone- iodine against induction of oral mucositis by radiochemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 1998;6:373-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200050179
  19. Block C, Robenshtok E, Simhon A, Shapiro M. Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test. J Hosp Infect 2000;46: 147-52. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0805
  20. McLure AR, Gordon J. In-vitro evaluation of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 1992;21:291-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(92)90139-D
  21. Loe H, Schiott CR. The effect of mouthrinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in men. J Periodontal Res 1970;5:79-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1970.tb00696.x
  22. Yoneyama A, Shimizu M, Tabata M, Yashiro J, Takata T, Hikida M. In vitro short-time killing activity of povidone-iodine (Isodine Gargle) in the presence of oral organic matter. Dermatology 2006;212(Suppl 1):103-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089207
  23. Itic J, serfaty R. Clinical effectiveness of subgingival irrigation with a pulsated jet irrigator versus syringe. J Periodontol 1992; 63:174-81. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.3.174
  24. van Strydonck DA, Timmerman MF, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Plaque inhibition of two commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:305-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00681.x

피인용 문헌

  1. 기관 삽관 환자의 구강간호시간에 따른 구강 건강 상태 및 세균집락의 차이 vol.17, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2015.17.2.97