일본의 시정촌 통합과 행정구역 재편의 공간정치

The Politics of Space in the Municipal Mergers of Japan

  • 조아라 (서울대학교 일본연구소)
  • Cho, A-Ra (Institute for Japanese Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.01.25
  • 심사 : 2010.03.09
  • 발행 : 2010.03.31

초록

지난 10년간 일본에서는 대대적인 행정구역 개편이 진행되어, 시정촌 수가 약 40% 감소하는 지각변동을 경험하였다. 이 연구는 월경지 형성에 주목하여, 일본의 시정촌 통합의 과정을 공간정치적 관점에서 밝혀보고자 하였다. 일본에서 시정촌 통합이 추진되어 온 배경과 경과는 행정구역 개편이 '지방분권' 보다는 국가의 재정적 위기를 극복하기 위한 '구조조정'의 성격을 띠고 있음을 보여주는데, 그 결과 일본의 시정촌 통합은 시 공간적으로 불균등하게 진행되었다. 연구지역의 시정촌 통합은 재정속성, 인구속성, 입지성, 영역성, 장소성, 의사결정의 정치성의 다각적인 공간정치로 분석된다. 행정구역은 기본적으로 공간적인 속성을 지니고 있다는 점에서, 행정구역의 재편은 지역의 특수성과 일반성을 동시에 고려하여 신중하게 접근할 필요가 있다.

Local administrative districts in Japan have extensively reformed over the last 10 years and have decreased by 40 percent. This study examines the process of the municipal mergers in Japan from the perspective of the politics of space, in addition to a focus on the formation of Tobichi (enclaves). The background and progress of municipal mergers in Japan revealed that the reformation of administrative districts progressed under 'restruction' rather than 'decentralization' to manage a financial crisis of government. As a result, the municipal mergers of Japan have progressed in spatiotemporal inequality. The municipal mergers of the study areas are analyzed in multi-dimensional spatial politics composed of financial and demographic properties, locationality, territoriality, placeness, and the politics of decision making. Administrative districts have a spatial property; the reformation of them should be considered with the specialty and generality of the region.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ARPAK and RICPC, 2005, Research Related to Regional Management Following the Consolidation of Municipalities: Regional Governance and Regional Promoting, NIRA (in Japanese).
  2. Chi, S. H., 2000, A Study on the Conflict Caused by the Reform of the Administrative District, Seoul National University, M.A. Thesis (in Korean).
  3. Cho, A., 2007, Social Reconstruction of Regional Identity based on Cultural Tourism: A Case of Japanese Local Cities, Seoul National University, Ph. D. Thesis (in Korean).
  4. Cho, A., 2008, The politics of space in cultural strategies of Japanese local cities, Journal of the Korean Association of Regional geography, 14(5), 480- 791 (in Korean).
  5. Ha, J. B., 2008, A study on realignment plan of prefectures system in Japan: Focusing on introducing decentralized state(doshusei) system, The Korean Association for Governance Studies, 15(2), 211-240 (in Korean).
  6. Hartshorne, R., 1939, The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past, Minumsa.
  7. Hobo, T., 2002, Municipalities Merger and Future Prospect of Region, Iwanami Shoten (保母武彦, 2002, 市町村合併と地域のゆくえ, 岩波書店).
  8. Hobo, T., 2007, How Could We Reshape the Region after Heisei Merger, Iwanami Shoten (保母武彦, 2007, 平成の大合併後の地域をどう立て直すか, 岩波書店).
  9. Hokkaido, 2006, Plan for Promoting Municipalities Merger in Hokkaido (北海道, 2006, 北海道市町 村合併推進構想).
  10. Huh, J., 2008, Situation and problems of decentralization in Japan, Law Journal, 19(1), 159-186.
  11. Hukuda, T., Owada, I., and the Group of Citizen Who Thinking of Akirunoshi's Policy, 2007, A Verification of Municipal Amalgamation for the Residence by the Residence, Japan Institute of Local Government.
  12. Ikegami, H., 2000, A Question about Municipalities Merger, Japan Institute of Local Government (池 上洋通, 2000, 市町村合併これだけの疑問, 自治体硏究社).
  13. Imao, K., 2005, Place Name Emerged and Disappeared, Jitsugyo no Nohon Sha (今尾恵介, 2005, 生まれる地名, 消える地名, 実業之日本社).
  14. Japan Center for Cities, 2006, General Survey of Merger: Casebook of City that merged after reform of the Law Concerning the Special Cases of Mergers of Municipalities (日本都市センタ一, 2006, 合要覧 : 市町村合併特例法改正以後の合併都市の事例集).
  15. Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., and Watts, M., 2000, The Dictionary of Human Geography, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  16. Kajita, S., 2008, Development of local allocation tax-cut policies for municipalities with small population and its interpretation: Focusing on relations with municipal merger policies, Geographical Review of Japan, 81(2), 60-75 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.4157/grj.81.60
  17. Kawamura, M., 2007, Municipalities Merger and Welfare of Region: Problem from the Practice Survey of Heisei Merger, Minerva Shobo (川村匡由, 2007, 市町村合併と地域福祉: 平成の大合併全国実態調査からみた課題, ミネルヴァ書房).
  18. Kawase, N., 2003, The logic and the reality of municipalities merger, Area Development Research, 466, 6-10, 466, 6-10).
  19. Kitahara, T., 2003, The present situation and problem of municipalities merger in Heisei period, Area Development Research, 466, 39-45.
  20. Knight, D., 1982, Identity and territory: Geographical perspectives on nationalism and regionalism, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(4), 514-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01842.x
  21. Konishi, S., 2000, Suggestions for Municipalities Merger, Gyosei (小西砂千夫, 2000, 市町村合併ノススメ, ぎょうせい).
  22. Kwon, Y. J., 2006, A study on the municipal mergers in Japan, Local Government Studies, 10(3), 63-79 (in Korean).
  23. Lee, J. W., 2008, Decentralization and municipalities in Japan, Korea Association of Japanology Studies, 76, 367-377.
  24. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan, 2005, Population Census of Japan (in Japanese).
  25. Mitsuhashi, Y. and Japan Institute of Local Government, 2001, Wait a Minute Municipalities Merger (三橋良士明.自治問題硏究所, 2001, ちょっと待て市町村合).
  26. Miyamoto, S. and Frukawa, N., 2008, The function of cable television in the formation of community identity, Research Report (School of Human Science and Environment, University of Hyogo), 10, 131-144 (in Japanese).
  27. Nakashibetsucho, 2004, The 5th Overall Development Plan of Nakashibetsucho (中標津町, 2004, 第5期中標津町総合開發計画).
  28. Oh, J. Y., 2007, A study on the restructuring of administrative districts in Japan: Cases of municipalities, The Korean Association for Governance Studies, 14(2), 349-371 (in Korean).
  29. Okada, H., 2005, Public participation in the policy process of local government, Regional research (Kushiro Public University of Economics), 14, 63-85 (in Japanese).
  30. Ono, J., 2005, An interim report on the merging of municipalities in the Heisei period, Journal of Atomi Univerisity Faculty of Management, 3, 31-49 (in Japanese).
  31. Paasi, A., 1986, The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework of understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity, Fennia, 164(1), 105-146. https://doi.org/10.11143/9052
  32. Paasi, A., 1996, Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness, John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Park, B. G., 2006, Cities and politics, in Kim, I. and Park, S. J.(eds.), Urban Geography and Urbanology, 156-175 (in Korean).
  34. Sasaki, N., 2002, The merger of Municipalities, Chikuma Shobo (佐佐木信夫, 2002, 市町村合併, 筑摩書房)
  35. Sorlin, S., 1999, The articulation of territory: Landscape and the constitution of regional and national identity, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift Norwegian, Journal of Geography, 53, 103-112.
  36. Study Group on the Merger of Municipalities, 2008, A Assessment, Verification and Analysis of Merger of Heisei (市町村の合併に関する硏究會, 2008, 平成の合併の評価.検証 .分析).
  37. Takashima, S., 2002, Merger of Municipalities, Gyosei (高島茂樹, 2002, 市町村合併 そこが知りたかっ た, ぎょうせい).
  38. The 27th Local Government System Research Council, 2003, Report on the Future of Local Government (第27次地方制度調査會, 2003, 今後の地方自治制度のあり方に関する答申).
  39. The 29th Local Government System Research Council, 2003, The 3th General Assembly Reference Material (第29次地方制度調査會, 2008, 第3回総会 資料).
  40. Yamada, A., 2006, A verification of the failure of municipal amalgamation, Studies in Humanities and Cultures, 5, 27-36 (in Japanese).
  41. Yim, S. H., 1994, Problems of administrative area system in Korea and reforming direction, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 29(1), 65-83 (in Korean).
  42. Yoshimura, H., 1999, Optimum Size of a City and Municipalities Merger, Toyokeizai (吉村弘, 1999, 最適都市規模と市町村合併, 東洋経済新報社).
  43. http://www.soumu.go.jp/gapei/