Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지

Characteristics of Musim Stream by Surveyed Sites Based on EPT-group of Aquatic Insects1a

수서곤충 EPT-group을 이용한 무심천의 조사지점별 특성

  • Published : 2008.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study compared and analyzed EPT ratio, EPT richness and EPT number(number of species and individuals) of a total of 9 selected sites individually using EPT-group of aquatic insects in Musim stream, also compared similarity ratio between the sampling sites using UPGMA(Unweighted Paired Group Method using Arithmetic average) based on analysis subsequent to species structure of aquatic insects, and compared and analyzed a functional feeding groups(FFGs) of aquatic insects based on stream order. As a result, the aquatic insect group of 2,269 individuals is classified as 71 species, 36 families, and 8 orders, and EPT ratio and EPT richness at sites 3(0.72 and 3.89, respectively) were found to be relatively higher than those at the other sites; by contrast, those at site 9(0.03 and 0.09, respectively) were relatively low. EPT number of species and individuals was found to be lowest at site 9. As a result of UPGMA analysis, the sampling sites in Musim stream were divided into three groups, including A1(site 1, 7, 8), A2(site 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and B(site 9). According to the results of FFGs, there was not shown specific difference in the number of functional feeding groups by each sites; however, there appeared a little more shredders and scrappers in the upper and mid stream comparing to other sampling sites while collector-filterers and collector-gatherers were found to be dominant in number in the lower stream. According to this research result, the sampling sites in Musim stream were found to have an effect on not only EPT richness, EPT ratio, and EPT number but also FFGs structure.

본 연구는 무심천의 상류부터 하류까지 총 9개 지점을 선정하여 수서곤충의 EPT-group을 이용하여 EPT-비율, EPT 풍부도, EPT 종수와 개체수를 지점별로 비교분석하였고 수서곤충의 종 조성에 따른 UPGMA분석으로 조사지점간의 유사도를 비교하였으며 수서곤충의 섭식기능군은 하천차수에 의해 비교분석하였다. 조사결과에 의하면 무심천의 수서곤충은 총 8목 36과 71종으로 조사되었고 EPT 비율과 EPT 풍부도는 지점 3에서 각각 0.72, 3.89로 다른 지점에 비해 다소 높게 나타났으며 이와 반대로 지점 9에서는 0.03, 0.09로 비교적 낮게 나타났다. 또한 EPT 종수 및 개체수는 지점 9에서 가장 낮게 나타났다. UPGMA분석 결과 무심천의 각 지점은 A1(st. 1, 7, 8), A2(st. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), B(st. 9)로 3개의 그룹으로 나뉘었으며 섭식기능군은 지점별 차이는 나타나지 않았지만 상.중류역에서는 써는무리와 긁어먹는 무리가 다른 지점에 비해 다소 높게 나타난 반면 하류에서는 걸러먹는무리와 줍는무리가 우세한 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구 의하면 조사지점에 따라 수서곤충의 EPT-richness, EPT-ratio, EPT 수 뿐만 아니라 섭식기능군의 조성에도 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽인실, 송미영, 전태수(2004) 저서성 대형무척추동물의 자연적 교란에 대한 영향. 한국육수학회지 37(1): 87-95
  2. 배연재, 이병훈(2001) 한국 하천생태계의 환경훼손과 담수절지동물의 생물다양성 피해 및 보전. 한국곤충학회지 31(2): 63-76
  3. 배연재, 원두희, 황득휘, 진영헌, 황정미(2003) 경기도 가평천의 하순에 따른 수서곤충 군집조성과 섭식기능군. 한국육수학회지36(1): 21-28
  4. 윤일병(1988) 한국동식물도감 제 30권 동물편(수서곤충류). 문교부, 서울, 840
  5. 윤일병(1995) 수서곤충검색도설. 정행사, 서울, 7-218쪽
  6. 윤일병, 공동수, 유재근(1992a) 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구 (II). 한국환경생물학회지 10: 77-84
  7. 윤일병, 공동수, 유재근(1992b) 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구 (III). 한국환경생물학회지 25: 177-183
  8. 위인선, 나철호(1991) 수질환경오염에 대한 수서곤충 지표종에 관한 연구. 한국환경생물학회지 1: 42-54
  9. 환경백서(1997) 제3장 수환경보전 . 환경부행정간행물. 380000-67030-06-51. pp 315-360
  10. Allan, J.D.(1995) Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman & Hall, Landon
  11. Coimbra, C.N., M.A.S Graca and R.M. Cortes(1996) The effects of a basic effluent on macroinvertebrate community structure in a temporary Mediterranean river. Environmental Pollution 94(3): 301-307 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(96)00091-7
  12. Cummins, K.W.(1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic water. Am. Midl. Nat. 67: 477-504 https://doi.org/10.2307/2422722
  13. Cummins, K.W. and M.J. Klug(1979) Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 147-172 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001051
  14. Davis, S.D., S.W. Golladay, G. Vellidis and C.M. Pringle(2003) Macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in intermittent coastal plain stream impacted by animal agriculture. J. Environ. Qual. 32: 1036-1043 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.1036
  15. Hellawell, J.M.(1986) Biological indicators of fresh water pollution and environmental management. Elsevier. London, 546
  16. Hynes, H.B.N. and M.J. Coleman(1968) A simple method of assessing the annual production of stram benthos. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13: 569-573 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1968.13.4.0569
  17. Jaccard, P.(1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270
  18. Kawai, T.(1985) An illustrated book of aquatic insets of Japan. Tokai University
  19. Klemm, D.J., P.A. Lewis, F. Fulk and J.M. Lazorchak(1990) Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. EPA. Cincinnati Oh, USA
  20. Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins(1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 3rd. Kendall/Hunt. Dubuque, Iowa
  21. Peitz, D.G.(2003) Macroinvertebrate monitoring as an indicator of water quality: Status report for pipestone Creek, Pipestone National Monument, 1989-2002. 1-13
  22. Pennak, R.W. (1989) Fresh water invertebrates of the United States (3rd cd.). John Wiley & Sons. New York, 628
  23. Resh, V.H. and G. Grodhaus(1983) Aquatic insects in urban environments. pp. 247-276 In Urban Entomology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. G.W. Frankie and C.S.Koehler, editors. Praeger Publishers. New York
  24. Rosenberg, D.M. and V.H. Resh(1993) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall (Eds.). London
  25. Rutherford, D.A., A.A. Echelle and O.E. Maughan(1987) Changes in the fauna of the little river drainage, south-eastern Oklahoma, 1948-1955 to 1981-1982: Test of the hypothesis of environmental degradation. Community and evolutionary ecology of north American stream fishes. Univ. of Oklahoma. pp. 178-183