Comparisons between a Forest Road with a Coniferous Plantation and Distributed Vegetation on the Edge of a Forest, and Reclaimed Soil Seed Bank

식재 침엽수 숲길과 숲 가장자리 분포 식생 및 매토종자 비교

  • Joe, Sun-Hee (Department of Environmental Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Kee-Dae (Department of Environmental Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 조선희 (한국교원대학교 환경교육과) ;
  • 김기대 (한국교원대학교 환경교육과)
  • Published : 2008.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in aboveground flora and underground flora between a forest road and a forest edge and to clarify each characteristic through ecological approach to a forest road. The study site was the forest planted with Pinus koraiensis and Abies holophylla, and located at an altitude of 45m($36^{\circ}36'23''N127^{\circ}21'45''E$). The width of the forest road is 3.2m. This research set the forest edge within the areas 5m away from the forest road and also conducted a survey on vegetation 5 times from september 2006 to August 2007. In addition, it installed thirty six quadrats to make an analysis of reclaimed soil seed bank. Soil amounting to 600$cm^3$ was collected from each quadrat using soil samplers(100$cm^3$),which was preserved in low temperature refrigeration for a month. Soil was thinly strewed evenly on trays and watered every four or five days; then, this research did experiment for six months until no more germination took place. Through this process, this research identified species and counted the number of germinating individuals by using emerging seedlings. The research result showed that on the whole, the similarity index between aboveground flora and underground flora was low. The correlation coefficient between the aboveground flora vegetations both on the forest road and on its edge was found to be 0.36, showing a correlation with each other(p<0.05). On the other hand, the correlation coefficient between underground flora vegetations through the analysis of reclaimed soil seed bank was 0.20, showing no correlation with each other(p>0.05). As the survey result of naturalized plants, there existed 7 species of naturalized plants on the forest road in case woody plants were included, showing 11.11% naturalization rate and 2.61% urbanization index(UI). On the other hand in case woody plants were not included among the naturalized plants, the naturalization rate on the forest road was 12.50% while the naturalization rate on the edge of the forest was 9.09%.

본 연구는 숲길에 대한 생태학적 접근을 통하여 숲길과 숲 가장자리의 상부와 지하부식생을 비교하고 그 특성을 밝히는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 연구 장소는 잣나무와 전나무를 식재한 숲으로, 해발 고도는 45m이다($36^{\circ}36'23''N127^{\circ}21'45''E$). 숲길의 폭은 3.2m이며, 숲 가장자리는 숲 길가로부터 5m로 정하였다. 2006년 9월부터 2007년 8월까지 총 5번의 식생조사가 이루어졌다. 매토종자 분석을 위해 숲길과 숲 가장자리에서 각각 18곳의 방형구를 정하였다. 각각의 방형구마다 토양 샘플러로 600$cm^3$ 토양을 채취하였고 저온처리를 위하여 한 달간 냉장 보관하였다. 포트에 토양을 골고루 얇게 펼친 후 4$\sim$5일마다 급수하였으며, 더 이상 발아가 일어나지 않는 상태가 될 때까지 실험을 6개월 동안 실시하였다. 출현한 유식물의 이용하여 종과 발아개체수를 확인하였다. 연구 결과, 전체적으로 지상부식생과 지하부식생 사이의 유사도지수는 낮았다. 숲길과 숲 가장자리의 지상부식생간의 상관계수는 0.36으로 상관관계가 있었다(p<0.05). 매토종자 분석을 통한 지하부식생간의 상관계수는 0.20로, 서로 상관관계가 없었다(p>0.05). 귀화식물 조사결과, 목본을 포함하였을 경우 숲길 귀화식물은 7종, 귀화율은 12.50%이었으며, 도시화지율은 2.61%이었다. 숲가장자리 귀화식물은 6종, 귀화율은 11.11%이었으며, 도시화율은 2.24%이었다. 귀화식물 중 목본을 포함하지 않았을 경우 숲길의 귀화율은 12.50%이나 숲 가장자리의 귀화율은 9.09%이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 길지현, 박수현, 고강석(2006) 울릉도의 귀화식물 분포. 한국자원식물학회지 19: 237-242
  2. 김기대, 조선희, 박미화 (2007) 한국교원대학교 교내 식물상. 환경학교육연구 11: 71-82
  3. 김은숙(2000) 도로에 인접한 숲 가장자리의 미기후 변화에 대한 완충제로서 하층 식생의 역할. 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문, 59쪽
  4. 김준민, 임양재, 전의식(2001) 한국의 귀화식물. 사이언스북스, 서울, 281쪽
  5. 산림청(2006) 임도의 건설로 인한 생물다양성 변화와 복원기술개발에 관한 연구. 산림청, 114쪽
  6. 박수현(2001) 한국귀화식물원색도감(보유편). 일조각, 서울, 371쪽
  7. 이창복(2003) 원색대한식물도감. 향문사, 서울, 910쪽
  8. 조정진(2004) 청미천에서 홍수 교란에 대한 하안 식생의 반응. 인하대학교석사학위논문, 47쪽
  9. Bray, J.R. and J.T. Curtis(1957) An ordination of the upland forest community of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27(4):325-349 https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268
  10. Buell, M.F., A.N. Langford, D.W. Dacidson, and L.F. Ohman (1966) ,The upland forest continuum in northern New Jersey, Ecology 47(3): 416-432 https://doi.org/10.2307/1932981
  11. Curtis and R.P. McIntosh(1951) An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476-496 https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725
  12. Goodson J.M., A.M. Gurnell, P.G. Angold, I.P. Morrissey(2001) Riparian seed banks: structure, process and implication for riparian management. Prog.Phys.Geog.25: 301-325
  13. Gross K.L.(1990) A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. J.Ecol. 78: 1079-1093 https://doi.org/10.2307/2260953
  14. Hanlon T.J., C.E. Williams and W.J. Moriarity(1998) Species composition of soil seed banks of Allegheny Plateau riparian forests. J. Torrey Bot. Soc.125: 119-215
  15. Hayashi, I. and M. Numata(1971) Viable buried-seed population in the Miscanthus and Zoysia-type grasslands in Japan-ecological studies on the buried-seed population in the soil related to plant succession VI. Jap. J. Ecol. 20: 243-252
  16. Kirkman L.K. and R.R. Sharitz(1994) Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of diversity in intermittently flooded carolina boys in South Carolina. Ecol. Appl. 4: 177-188 https://doi.org/10.2307/1942127
  17. Kim K.D. and E.J. Lee (2005) Soil seed bank of the waste landfills in South Korea. Plant Soil 271: 109-121 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-2159-2
  18. Landenberger R.E. and J.B. McGraw(2004) Seed-bank characteristics in ixed-mesophytic forest clearcuts and edges: Does "edge effect" extend to the seed bank?. Can. J. Botany 82: 992-1000 https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-080
  19. Marks P.L.(1983) On the origin of the field plants of the northeastern United States.Am. Nat.122: 210-228 https://doi.org/10.1086/284131
  20. Moore, P.D. and S.B. Chapman(1986) Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific. 390pp
  21. Parendes, L.A. and J.A. Jones(2000) Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant inwasion along roads and stream in the H.J. Andrews experimental forest, Oregon. Conserv. Biol. 14(1): 64-75 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99089.x
  22. Sheldrick B.H. and C. Wang(1993) Particle size distribution. In: M.R. Carter(ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, Florida, pp.499-511