대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.79-89
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

제품의 사용 후 처리전략 수립 최적화를 위한 계층적 에코 아키텍쳐 분석방법론

The Eco-Architecture for Optimal End-Of-Life Strategy for Complex Products : An Extension to Hierarchical Analysis

  • 곽민정 (서울대학교 공학연구소) ;
  • 이현복 (SK 에너지 Customer전략.개발팀) ;
  • 홍유석 (서울대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 조남욱 (서울산업대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 최건영 (서울대학교 산업공학과)
  • Kwak, Min Jung (Engineering Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Bok (Customer Strategy Development Team, SK Energy) ;
  • Hong, Yoo Suk (Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Nam Wook (Department of Industrial & Information Systems Engineering) ;
  • Choi, Keon Young (Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

An end-of-life strategy is concerned with how to disassemble a product and what to do with each of the resultingdisassembled parts. A sound understanding of the end-of-life strategy at the early design stage could improve theease of disassembly and recycling in an efficient and effective manner. Therefore, the end-of-life decisionmaking for environmental conscious design has become a great concern to product manufacturers.We introduce a novel concept ofeco-architecture which represents a scheme by which the physical componentsare allocated to end-of-life modules. An end-of-life module is a physical chunk of connected components or afeasible subassembly which can be simultaneously processed by the same end-of-life option without furtherdisassembly. In this paper, a method for analyzing the eco-architecture of a product at the configuration designstage is proposed. It produces an optimal eco-architecture under the given environmental regulations. To dealwith the case ofa complex product, the method is extended for analyzing hierarchical eco-architecture.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국학술진흥재단

참고문헌

  1. Chen, R. W., Navin-Chandra, D., and Prinz, F. B. (1994), A Cost- Benefit analysis Model of Product Design for Recyclability and its Application, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A, 17(4), 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1109/95.335032
  2. Das, S. and Naik, S. (2001), The DBOM standard : a specification for efficient product data transfer between manufacturers and demanufacturers, Proceedings of 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Denver, CO, USA.
  3. Das, S. and Naik, S. (2002), Process planning for product disassembly, International Journal of Production Research, 40(6), 1335-1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110102142
  4. Dong, J. and Arndt, G. (2003), A review of current research on disassembly sequence generation and computer-aided design for disassembly, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture, 217(3), 299-312.
  5. Duverlie, P. and Castelain, J. M. (1999), Cost Estimation During Design Step：Parametric Method versus Case Based Reasoning Method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15(12), 895-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700050147
  6. Eggert, R. J. (2005), Engineering Design, Pearson Prentice Hall.
  7. Erdos, G., Kis, T. and Xirouchakis, P. (2001), Modelling and evaluating product end-of-life options, International Journal of Production Research, 39(6), 1203-1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845985
  8. Fixson, S. K. (2004), Assessing product architecture costing : Product life cycles, allocation rules, and cost models, Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  9. Gonzalez, B. and Adenso-diaz, B. (2005), A bill of materials-based approach for end-of-life decision making in design for the environment, International Journal of Production Research, 43(10), 2071-2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540412331333423
  10. Hundal, M. S. (2002), Mechanical Life Cycle Handbook : Marcel Dekker.
  11. Johnson, M. R. and Wang, M. H. (1995), Planning product disassembly for material recovery opportunities, International Journal of Production Research, 33(11), 119-3142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549508904864
  12. Kanehara, T., Suzuki, T., Inaba, A. and Okuma, S. (1993), On algebraic and graph structural properties of assembly petri net, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 507-514.
  13. Krikke, H. R., van Harten, A. and Schuur, P. C. (1998), On a medium term product recovery and disposal strategy for durable assembly products, International Journal of Production Research, 36(1), 111-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498193967
  14. Lambert, A. J. D. (1999), Linear programming in disassembly/clustering sequence generation, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00162-X
  15. Lambert, A. J. D. (2002), Determining optimum disassembly sequences in electronic equipment, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(3), 553-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00125-0
  16. Lee, D.-H., Kang, J.-G. and Xirouchakis, P. (2001a), Disassembly planning and scheduling :review and further research, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture 215(5), 695-710.
  17. Lee, S. G., Lye, S. W. and Khoo, M. K. (2001b), A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700170086
  18. Murayama, T., Kagawa, K. and Oba, F. (1999), Computer-Aided Redesign for Improving Recyclability, Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan.
  19. Pnueli, Y. and Zussman, E. (1997), Evaluating the end-of-life value of a product and improving it by redesign, International Journal of Production Research, 35(4), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497195452
  20. Rush, C. and Roy, R. (2000), Analysis of cost estimating Processes used within a concurrent engineering environment throughout a product life cycle, Proceedings of CE2000 Conference, Lyon, France.
  21. Ulrich, K. (1995), The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy, Research Policy, 24(3), 419-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
  22. Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1999), A combinational cost -benefit analysis methodology for designing modular electronic products for the environment, Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Danvers, MA, USA.