Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Effect of resorbable membrane on immediate placement of implant in extraction socket during periradicular surgery

치근단 수출 시 형성된 골결손 부위를 가진 치아의 발치 후 즉시 식립 임플란트에서 골 접촉률에 대한 흡수성 차폐막의 효과

  • Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kye, Seung-Beom (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Yun (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 양승민 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과진료부 치주과) ;
  • 계승범 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과진료부 치주과) ;
  • 신승윤 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과진료부 치주과)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique is widely used in periradicular surgery. However, there is still some controversy regarding the effectiveness of GBR in promoting bone healing after periradicular surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resorbable membrane on the osteointegration of immediate implants in sites with periradicular lesion that had been removed by periradicular surgery. Materials and methods: Six roots of lower second premolars and 15 roots of lower third and fourth premolars of dogs were used as control and experimental teeth, respectively. Periradicular lesions were induced only in the experimental teeth. Twelve weeks later, the control and experimental teeth were extracted and implants were placed immediately. Periradicular lesions were removed with osteotomy, curettage and saline irrigation. Resorbable membranes were used in experimental group 1 but not in experimental group 2. After 12 week of healing period, the implants were clinically not mobile and showed no signs of infection. Data obtained by histomorphometric analysis were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The control group showed a significantly higher bone to implant contact (BIC) ($74.14{\pm}16.18$) than experimental group 1 ($40.28{\pm}15.96$) and 2 ($48.70{\pm}17.75$)(p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between experimental group 1 and 2. Conclusion: Although BIC in experimental groups were lower than in control group, immediate implant can be successfully placed at extraction socket with periradicular lesion and osseous defect. However, the use of resorbable membrane in bony defect created during periradicular surgery was questioned.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SH, Kim YS, Kim WK et al. Immediate implant placement in area of aestethetic priority. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37:637-646 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.3.637
  2. Quirynen M, Gijbels F, Jacobs R. An infected jawbone site compromising successful osseointegration. Periodontol 2000 2003;33:129-144 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03311.x
  3. Tehemar S, Hanes P, Sharawy M. Enhancement of osseointegration of implants placed into extraction sockets of healthy and periodontally diseased teeth by using graft material, an ePTFE membrane, or a combination. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:193-211 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00202.x
  4. Evian CI, Emling R, Rosenberg ES, et al. Retrospective analysis of implant survival and the influence of periodontal disease and immediate placement on long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:393-398
  5. Marcaccini AM, Novaes AB, Jr., Souza SL, Taba M, Jr., Grisi MF. Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs. Part 2: A fluorescence microscopy study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 812-819
  6. Novaes AB, Jr., Marcaccini AM, Souza SL, Taba M, Jr., Grisi MF. Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: a histomorphometric study of bone-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:391-398
  7. Siegenthaler DW, Jung RE, Holderegger C, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathology by immediate implants: a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:727-737 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01411.x
  8. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:705-710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.022
  9. Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205-209
  10. Novaes AB, Jr., Vidigal Junior GM, Novaes AB, et al. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:422-427
  11. Chang SW, Shin SY, Hong JR, et al. Immediate implant placement into infected and noninfected extraction sockets: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009.(In Press)
  12. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-343
  13. Becker W, Dahlin C, Lekholm U, et al. Five-year evaluation of implants placed at extraction and with dehiscences and fenestration defects augmented with ePTFE membranes: results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:27-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00088.x
  14. Rosenquist B, Ahmed M. The immediate replacement of teeth by dental implants using homologous bone membranes to seal the sockets: clinical and radiographic findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:572-582 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006572.x
  15. Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:388-399
  16. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goene R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:210-216
  17. Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goene R, et al. Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: a 5-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:93-99 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00111.x
  18. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, et al. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:329-339 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x
  19. Ayangco L, Sheridan PJ. Development and treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis involving a site with a history of failed endodontic and apicoectomy procedures: a series of reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:412-417
  20. Cosci F, Cosci B. A 7-year retrospective study of 423 immediate implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997; 18:940-942, 944, 946 passim
  21. Cavicchia F, Bravi F. Case reports offer a challenge to treatment strategies for immediate implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:66-81
  22. Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R. Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:384-392 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.031
  23. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-392 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x
  24. Tobon SI, Arismendi JA, Marin ML, Mesa AL, Valencia JA. Comparison between a conventional technique and two bone regeneration techniques in periradicular surgery. Int Endod J 2002;35:635-641 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00523.x
  25. Douthitt JC, Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE. Histologic assessment of healing after the use of a bioresorbable membrane in the management of buccal bone loss concomitant with periradicular surgery. J Endod 2001;27:404-410 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200106000-00009
  26. Garrett K, Kerr M, Hartwell G, O'Sullivan S, Mayer P. The effect of a bioresorbable matrix barrier in endodontic surgery on the rate of periapical healing: an in vivo study. J Endod 2002;28:503-506 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00003
  27. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997;68:915-923 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.915