대한지리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Geographical Society)

대한지리학회 (The Korean Geographical Society)
권호 표지

고령친화산업 행위주체 테트워크의 구조적.공간적 특성: 사회 네트워크 분석을 중심으로

The Structural and Spatial Characteristics of the Actor Networks of the Industries for the Elderly: Based on the Social Network Analysis

  • Koo, Yang-Mi (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements)
  • 발행 : 2008.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 고령친화산업의 제조부문과 관련된 행위주체 네트워크를 사회 네트워크 분석 방법을 이용하여 구조적, 공간적 특성을 분석한 것이다. 기존의 경제지리학 연구들이 네트워크 거버넌스 측면에 강조를 둔 것에 비해 본 연구는 네트워크 구조 분석에 초점을 두었다. 행위주체를 기업과 조직으로 나누어 네트워크 매트릭스 자료를 구축하고, 중심성 지수를 이용하여 네트워크의 위상구조적 특성을 분석하였다. 또한 공간구조적 분석을 위해서 행위주체의 지역별 비율을 비교하고, 중심성 지수와 거리 지표들의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 블록모델링을 이용하여 행위주체간 네트워크를 지역간 네트워크로 변환하여 공간적 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 초기 제도구축 과정에 있는 고령친화산업은 정부의 산업진흥 정책으로 비수도권 지역에 위치한 조직들이 네트워크에서의 영향력이 높게 나타났으며, 비수도권 간의 네트워크 역시 활발한 것으로 나타났다.

Based on the social network analysis(SNA), this study examines the structural and spatial characteristics of the actor networks of the manufacturing industries for the elderly. In the field of economic geography, former researches on network have mainly focused on the network governance. However, this study focused on the social network analysis. Centrality indexes are used to analyze the topological structure of actor networks of firms and organizations. In order to investigate the spatial structure of actor networks, not only the regional distribution of actors but also the correlation between centrality index and distance are analyzed. Network matrixes among actors are transformed to network matrixes among regions using block modeling method to reveal the spatial characteristics of the actor networks. In spite of the importance of the Capital Region, networks in the non-Capital Region like Chungnam and Pusan were showed high network density. This suggested that some kinds of policy project operating in the non-Capital Region had the influence on this network in the initial stage of industry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고령친화용품산업화지원센터, 2006, 2006 고령친화용품산업체 연감, 고령친화용품산업화지원센터
  2. 김용학, 2003, 사회 연결망 분석, 박영사, 서울
  3. 김용학, 2004, 사회 연결망 이론 (개정판), 박영사, 서울
  4. 박삼옥, 2006, '지식정보사회의 신경제공간과 지리학 연구 의 방향,' 대한지리학회지, 41(6), 639-656
  5. 박삼옥, 2008, '경제지리학의 패러다임변화와 신경제지리 학,' 한국경제지리학회지, 11(1), 8-23
  6. 손동원, 2002, 사회 네트워크 분석, 경문사
  7. 이견직. 변재관. 장석인. 고정민. 전병유. 허영. 오영 수. 박신영. 임병묵. 박대식, 2005, 고령친화산 업 활성화 전략, 고령화 및 미래사회위원회. 보건 복지부
  8. 이희연, 1996, 경제지리학, 법문사, 서울
  9. 한주성, 2006, 경제지리학의 이해, 한울아카데미, 파주
  10. 허우긍, 2003, '인터넷 하이퍼링크로 본 도시 네트워크, ' 대한지리학회지, 38(4), 518-534
  11. Amin, A., 1999, An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365-378 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00201
  12. Barnes, T. J., 2001, Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the 'cultural turn', Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 546-565 https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00258
  13. Bathelt, H. and Glückler, J., 2003, Toward a relational economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117-144 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
  14. Boggs, J. S. and Rantisi, N. M., 2003, The 'relational turn' in economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 109-116 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.109
  15. Boschma, R. A., 1997, New industries and windows of locational opportunity: a long-term analysis of Belgium, Erdkunde, 51(1), 12-22 https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02
  16. Boschma, R. A. and Frenken, K., 2007, Introduction: applications of evolutionary economic geography, in Frenken, K. (ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, 1-24
  17. Coleman, J. S., 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94 Supplement, S95-S120 https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  18. Cyram, 2007, NetMiner 3 User's Guide, Cyram Co., Ltd
  19. Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., and Yeung, H. W., 2001, Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards a Relational Framework for Analysing the Global Economy, Global Networks, 1(2), 89-112 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00007
  20. Ettlinger, N., 2001, A relational perspective in economic geography: connecting competitiveness with diversity and difference, Antipode, 33(2), 216-227 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00181
  21. Ettlinger, N., 2003, Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities, networks, and change in collaborative workplaces, Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 145-171 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.145
  22. Freeman, L. C., 1979, Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  23. Gertler, M. S., 1995, 'Being there': proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies, Economic Geography, 71(1), 1-26 https://doi.org/10.2307/144433
  24. Gertler, M. S., 2003, Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there), Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75-99 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
  25. Giuliani, E., 2007, The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(1), 139-168 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl014
  26. Gluckler, J., 2007, Economic Geography and the evolution of networks, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 619-634 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm023
  27. Grabher, G., 2006, Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of 'networks' between economic sociology and economic geography, Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 163-189 https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph600oa
  28. Granovetter, M., 1985, Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510 https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  29. Hess, M., 2004, 'Spatial' relationships? towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness, Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165-186 https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph479oa
  30. Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., and Watts, M. (eds.), 2000, The Dictionary of Human Geography (4th Edition), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK
  31. Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore, B., and Wilkinson, F., 1999, Collective learning processes networking and 'institutional thickness' in the Cambridge region, Regional Studies, 33(4), 319-332 https://doi.org/10.1080/713693557
  32. Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R. N., 1998, Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation, Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140 https://doi.org/10.2307/2786835
  33. McLeod, G., 1997, 'Institutional thickness' and industrial governance in Lowland Scotland, Area, 29(4), 299-311 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1997.tb00032.x
  34. Mizruchi, M. S. and Marquis, C., 2006, Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic? identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks, Social Networks, 28(3), 187-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.06.002
  35. Murdoch, J., 1998, The spaces of actor-network theory, Geoforum, 29(4), 357-374 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6
  36. Murphy, J. T., 2003, Social space and industrial development in East Africa: deconstructing the logics of industry networks in Mwanza, Tanzania, Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 173-198 https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.173
  37. Pekkarinen, S. and Harmaakorpi, V., 2006, Building regional innovation networks: the definition of an age business core process in a regional innovation system, Regional Studies, 40(4), 401-413 https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600725228
  38. Shin, K-H and Timberlake, M., 2000, World cities in Asia: cliques, centrality and connectedness, Urban Studies, 37(12), 2257-2285 https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020002805
  39. Smith, R. G., 2003, World city actor-networks, Progress in Human Geography, 27(1), 25-44 https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph411oa