Validity of MAST-CLA for diagnosis of arthropod allergy using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

  • Park, Joon-Soo (Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Nam, Hae-Seon (Department of Clinical Parasitology, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Choi, Young-Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Ho (Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

Many allergists are currently focusing on the development of new diagnostic tools, and are attempting to improve both the sensitivity and specificity. A multiple allergen simultaneous test-chemiluminescent assay (MAST-CLA) is one of the most popular diagnostic tools used in the Republic of Korea. However, there remains controversy among allergists with regard to the cut-off point for a positive result. The present study was conducted in order to determine the validity of MAST-CLA as compared with that of the skin prick test, with particular emphasis on arthropod allergens, on the basis of percentage agreement rates and k-values, and also to suggest the optimal positive cutoff points using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The study was conducted with 97 subjects (54 men, 43 women). Optimal individual cut-off points were calculated as follows; class II for Dermatophagoides farinae, class I for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and trace for a cockroach mix. These findings suggest that attempting to apply optimal individual cut-off points will be a good way of improving diagnostic tests, particularly MAST-CLA.

Keywords

References

  1. Agata H, Yomo A, Hanashiro Y, Muraki T, Kondo N, Orii T (1993) Comparison of the MAST chemiluminescent assay system with RAST and skin tests in allergic children. Ann Allergy 70: 153-157
  2. Brown CR, Higgins KW, Frazer K, Schoelz LK, Dyminski JW, Marinkovich VA, Miller SP, Burd JF (1985) Simultaneous determination of total IgE and allergenspecific IgE in serum by the MAST chemiluminescent assay system. Clin Chem 31: 1500-1505
  3. Finnery JP, Summerell S, Holgate ST (1989) Relationship between skin-prick tests, the multiple allergosorbent test and symptoms of allergic disease. Clin Exp Allergy 19: 51-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1989.tb02343.x
  4. Hwang KY, Park JS, Ahn HC, Nam HS (2001) Prevalence of arthropod antibodies in Korean patients with allergic rhinitis. Korean J Parasitol 39: 197-199 https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2001.39.2.197
  5. Illi S, von Mutius E, Lau S, Nickel R, Niggeman B, Sommerfeld C, Wahn U (2001) The pattern of atopic sensitization is associated with the development of asthma in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 108: 709-714 https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2001.118786
  6. Jaakkola MS, Ieromnimon A, Jaakkola JJ (2006) Are atopy and specific IgE to mites and molds important for adult asthma? J Allergy Clin Immunol 117: 642-648 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.11.003
  7. Kiniker WT (1989) Is the choice of allergy skin testing versus in vitro determination of specific IgE no longer a scientific issue? Ann Allergy 62: 373-374
  8. Lee SR, Lee HR, Keum DG (1995) Evaluation of the MASTCLA allergy System (Korea IgE panel) for diagnosis of atopic allergy. Korean J Clin Pathol 15: 469-477
  9. Lim HS, Yoon JK, Lee HH (2001) Allergen patterns using MAST CLA test in Korean pediatric patients. Korean J Clin Pathol 21: 292-297
  10. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminar Nucl Med 8: 283-298
  11. Miller SP, Marinkovich VA, Riege DH, Sell WJ, Baker DL, Eldredge NT, Dyminski JW, Hale RG, Peisach JM, Burd JF (1984) Application of the MAST Immunodiagnostic System to the determination of allergen-specific IgE. Clin Chem 30: 1467-1472
  12. Nepper-Christensen S, Backer V, DuBuske LM, Nolte H (2003) In vitro diagnostic evaluation of patients with inhalant allergies: Summary of probability outcomes comparing results of CLA- and CAP-specific Immunoglobulin E test systems. Allergy and Asthma Proc 24: 253-258
  13. Orgino S, Bessho K, Harada T, Irifune M (1991) Evaluation of allergen-specific IgE antibodies by MAST for the diagnosis of nasal allergy. Rhinology 31: 27-31
  14. Park HS, Kim JW, Chung DH, Kim YJ (1991) Relationships between skin prick test, radioallergosorbent test, and chemiluminescent assay in allergic patients. Korean J Allergy 11: 347-354
  15. Scolozzi R, Boccafogli A, Vincentini L, Baraldi A, Bagni B (1989) Correlation of MAST chemiluminescent assay (CLA) with RAST and skin prick tests for diagnosis of inhalant allergic disease. Ann Allergy 62: 193
  16. Scolozzi R, Vincentini L, Boccafogli A, Camerani A, Pradella R, Cavallini A, Bagni B (1992) Comparative evaluation of RAST and MAST-CLA for six allergens for the diagnosis of inhalant allergic disease in 232 patients. Clin Exp Allergy 22: 227-231 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb03077.x
  17. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health Measurement Scales. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
  18. Tang RB, Wu KG (1989) Total serum IgE, allergy skin testing, and the radioallergosorbent test for the diagnosis of allergy in asthmatic children. Ann Allergy 62: 432-435
  19. Tang RB, Wu KG, Hwang BT (1994) Comparison between skin testing and in vitro testing for diagnosis of allergen in asthmatic children. Chin Med J (Taipei) 54: 246-250
  20. Van Durme P, Stevens E (1989) The 'Pharmacia CAP System': a more sensitive tool for detection of specific IgE in the serum: a clinical evaluation. Allergologie 12: 41
  21. Yang SE, Oh HB, Hong SJ, Moon DH, Chi HS (1998) Analysis of MAST chemiluminescent assay (MAST CLA) results performed in asan medical center – Suggestion for the improvement of MAST CLA performance –. Korean J Clin Pathol 18: 660-666
  22. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39: 561-577