Study on the Ratio of Greenness in Residential Complex Development in the Process of Prior Environmental Review System

사전환경검토 대상 택지개발사업의 녹지율분석에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Sung-Ok (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Don (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김성옥 (이화여자대학교 공과대학 환경학과) ;
  • 이상돈 (이화여자대학교 공과대학 환경학과)
  • Received : 2007.06.25
  • Accepted : 2007.10.08
  • Published : 2007.10.30

Abstract

This study was conducted based on the 115 development projects of residential areas during 2001-2006 to investigate the current status of park green areas. Prior Environmental Review System (PERS) was categorized into regions, scales, and time of the projects, and regression model was used for a statistical analysis. The ratios of greenness of Seoul and Gyunggi province were greater than those of other regions whereas the ratios of greeness of Cheonnam, Chungbuk, and Jeonbuk provinces showed smaller percentage of green areas. Secondly as the scales of development get bigger areas of greenness become larger indicating a large scale residential development projects are favorable for securing green areas. Thirdly the correlation between planned area and green areas, and that between planned population and the ratio of greenness are relatively low (P>0.05). This implies green areas are not a good indicator but a concrete guideline for green areas. Fourthly the ratio of greenness of small scale project is not reached to 10% so that it is recommended to secure over one million $m^2$ areas for development project.

Keywords

References

  1. 이영수, 2004, 단지조성사업의 사전환경성검토에 관한 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원
  2. 임양빈, 2004, 대전광역시 공원 현황, 서울시정개발연구원 보고서
  3. 전성우, 2001, 토지의 환경성 평가기준에 관한 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원
  4. 환경부, 2000 , 전략환경평가 기법개발 및 중점평가 도입방안에 관한 연구
  5. 환경부, 2001, 친환경적 도시계획수립 방안 연구, 환경부
  6. 환경부, 2006, 사전환경성검토 업무 매뉴얼, 환경부
  7. Cranz, G., 1982, The politics of park design A history of urban parks in America, The MIT Press, p. 138
  8. Geneletti, D., 2002, Ecological evaluation for environmental impact assessment. Netherlands Geographical Studies, NGS 301
  9. Lee, S. D., 1999.. The current status and future development of Korea environmental impact assessment, Korean Journal of Environment Economic Review, 8, 163-174
  10. Lee, S. D., 2004, Analysis of problems and improvement of environmental impact assessment in socal-economic items based on 19 major large scale development projects. Korean journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 13, 165-186
  11. Lee, S. D., 2005, Strategic environment assessment and biological diversity conservation in the Korean high-speed railway project. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7, 287-298 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333205002018
  12. Ministty of Environment, 1998, Natural Environmental Conservation Act. Republic of Korea
  13. Ministty of Environment, 1998, Natural Environmental Conservation Act. Republic of Korea
  14. OECD, 1994, Environmental Impact Assessment of land development, Paris
  15. Thompson, S. J. R. Treweek, N. Veicth, and D. J. Thurling, 1997, The ecological component of environmental impact assessment: a critical review of British environmental statements, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40, 157-171 https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569712164
  16. Treweek, J. R., 1996, Ecology and environmental impact assessment, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 191-19 https://doi.org/10.2307/2404742