Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.236-247
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cyanate methacrylate가 상아질 결합강도에 미치는 영향

THE EFFECT OF CYANATE METHACRYLATE ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS TO DENTIN

  • 김향경 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최기운 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Kim, Hyang-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Woon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2007.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

접착제의 술식을 간편하게 하고 효과적이며 안정적인 접착강도를 지닌 상아질 접착제를 개발하고자 isocyanate methacrylate의 농도를 달리해 상아질에 적용하여 전단결합강도를 측정하고 응집파괴양상을 분석, 평가하였다. Isocyanate methacrylate의 농도에 따라 0% (대조군), 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 및 12%의 7개 실험군으로 분류하였으며 , Instron (No.4466.USA)를 이용하여 복합레진의 전단 결합강도를 측정하고 Resin tag 및 응집파괴를 주사전자현미경으로 관찰해 다음 결론을 얻었다. 1. Cyanate methacrylate 8%군이 가장 높은 전단 결합강도는 나타내었으나 (33.62 KPa), 통계학적 유의성이 없었다 (P > 0.05). 2. Cyanate methacrylate 2% ,4% 및 6%군은 응집성파괴빈도가 대조군 (0%군)과 비교하여 높게 나타났다. 3. Cyanate menthacrylate군에서 레진tag의 길이는 짧게 나타났다. 이상의 연구의 결과로 cyanate methacrylate가 collagen과 반응하여 상아질 내로 침투를 방해하며 레진 tag의 길이를 짧게 하며 상아질의 유기성분과의 반응에 의하여 결합강도는 높아질 수 있으나, 상아질 자체의 강도가 낮아질 수 있어 상아질에 대한 결합강도의 실질적인 증가는 확인할 수 없었다.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cyanate methacylate on the shear bond strengths to bovine dentin surfaces as a dentin primers. Seven experimental adhesives were made with different mass fraction of Isocyanatoetylme-thacrylate (IEM), 40wt% HEMA (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Osaka, Japan), 0.6% camphoroquinone, 0.4% amine and ethanol as balance dentin bonding agents (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12%) were made and applied on the surface of bovine dentin specimens of 7 experimental groups. Shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine (Instro 4466). To identify the ratio and modes of cohesive failures, microscopic examinationn was performed. The ultra-structure of resin tags were observed under scanning electron microscope. The results were as follows ; 1) A higher shear bond strengths (33.62 MPa) in group 8% of Cyanate methacrylate to dentin were found, but there were no statistically significancy between Groups (p > 0.05). 2) The higher ratio of cohesive failures mode in group 2, 6, an 10% could be seen than that in any other groups. 3) A shorter resin tags were observed in all experimental groups. This could be resulted that the preventing from the cyanate methacrylate penetrate into dentin owing to reacting it with dentin collagen. Therefore the resin tags were shorter in lengths. Whether the higher bonding strengths of dentin bonding agents can be affected was not been assured with statistic results. The results indicated that the relation between tensile strengths of the dentin adhesives to bovine dentin and resin tags formed into the dentin could not affected. The main reason of increasing the shear bond strength to bovine dentin in experimental groups could not be assured.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849-853, 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Bowen RL. Cobb EN, Rapson JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: improvement in bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 61: 1070-1076, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610090901
  3. Hulmes DJS, Wess TJ. Prockop DJ, Fratzl P. Radial packing, order, and disorder in collagen fibrils. J Biophys 68:1661-1670. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80391-7
  4. Nakabayashi N and Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Quintessence Publishing Co. p1-107. 1998
  5. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J. Lambrechts P. Vanherle G. The clinicabonding to dentin with ferrous chloride primers and tri-n-butyl borane I performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1-20. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X
  6. Taira Y. Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive-initiated luting agents. J Dent Res 75:1859-64. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750110701
  7. Sensi LG. Lopes GC, Monterio S Jr. Baratieri LN, Vieira LC. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 30: 63-8. 2005
  8. Watanabe I.. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-p self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73:1212-1220. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  9. Taira Y, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding to dentin with ferrous chloride primers and tri-n-butylborane-initiated luting agents. J Dent Res 75:1859-64. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750110701
  10. Taira Y. Matsumura H. Atsuta M. Use of 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate and iron(II) perchlorate for bonding tri-n-butylborane-initiated luting agents to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 106:887-891, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106408.x
  11. Taira Y. Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Kamada K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Metal chloride primers for bonding dentine with tri-n-butyl borane-initi-ated luting agents. J Dent 26:603-608, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00030-4
  12. Munksgaard EC, Inc M and Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 64:1409-1411, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121801
  13. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 3:133-138, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00985.x
  14. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K. Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to burcut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30(1):39-49, 2005
  15. Chappelow CC, Power MD, Bowels CQ, Miller RG, Pinzino CS, Eick JD. Novel priming and crosslinking systems for use with isocyanato-methacrylate dental adhesives. Dent Mater 16:396-405, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00034-8
  16. Antonucci JM. Brauer GM, Termini DJ. Isocyanato urethane methacrylates derived from hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 59:35-43, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590010601
  17. Stachhouse JA Jr, Kristol DS, Von Hagen S, Rao G. Effect of substrate condition and substituted phenols and methacrylates on toluene diisocyanate/dentin bond strengths. J Biomed Mater Res 23:81-90, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230107
  18. Chappelow CC, Byerley TJ, Pinzino CS, Millich F, Eick JD. Design and development of isocyanatoacrylates as dental adhesives. J Dent Res 75:761-767, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750020501
  19. Lee CH and Brauer GM. Oligomers with pendant isocyanate groups as adhesives for dentin and other tissues. G. Dent Res 68:484-488, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680031001
  20. Brauer GM and Lee CH. Oligomers with pendant isocyanate groups as tissue adhesives : II Adhesion to bone and other tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 23:753-63. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230707
  21. Asmussen E and Munksgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentin by means of methacryloylchlo-ride and methacryloyl-R-isocyanate, Scand J Dent Res 91: 153-155, 1983
  22. Vanherle Guido and Smith Dennis C. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials, Amsterd-am: Peter Szulc pulblishing co. 1985
  23. Byerley TJ, Chappelow,CC, Chappell RP, Millich F, Eick JD. Isocyanatoacrylate, A new class of dental adhesives. J Dent Res 70:363-370, 1991
  24. Nishida, K., Yamauchi. J., Wada, T. Hosoda, H, Development of a new bonding system. J Dent Res 72: (IADR Abstracts) No, 267:137, 1993
  25. Ferrari M and Davidson CL. Sealing perfomance of Scotchbond Multi-purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations, Am J Dent 145-149, 1996
  26. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY, Micromorphological relationship of the resin-dentin interface following a total etch technique in vivo using a dentinal bonding system. Quint Int 26:63-70, 1995
  27. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. The overwet Phenomenon : An optical. micro- morphological study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resindentin interface. Am J Dent 9: 39-44, 1996
  28. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. The overwet Phenomenon : An transmission electronical micro-morphological study of surface moisture in the acid- conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 9: 161-166, 1996
  29. Swift EJ and Triolo PT. Bond strength of Scotchbond Multipurpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 5:318-320. 1992
  30. Ferrari M and Davidson CL. In vivo resin dentin interdiffusion and tag formation with lateral branches of two adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 76: 250-253, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90167-5
  31. Pashley DB. Livingston MJ, Greenhill JD. Regionl resistances to fluid flow in human dentin in vitro, Arch Oral Biol 23:807-810. 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(78)90159-0
  32. Holtan JR. Nystrom GP. Phelps RA. Anderson TB. Becker WS. Influence of different etchants and etching times on shear bond strength. Oper Dent 20:94-99, 1995
  33. Nikaido T. Burrow MF. Tagami J. Takatsu T. Effect of pulpal pressure on adhesion of resin composite to dentin: Bovine serum versus saline. Quint Int 26:221-226. 1995
  34. Reis A. Grandi V, Carlotto L, Borotoli G, Patzlaff R. Rodriguues Accorinte Mde L. Dourado Logguercio A. Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solution on early and long-term bonding strength to dentin. J Dent 33:549-559. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.12.003
  35. Kenshima S. Resi A. Uceda-Gomez N, Tancredo Lde, Filho LE. Nogueira FN. Loguercio AD. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesives on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin, J Adhes Dent 7: 117-126. 2005
  36. Tani C and Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength medicated by three all-in-one selfetching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent 4:283-289. 2002
  37. Tay FR. Carvalho R. Sano H. Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:99-116. 2000
  38. Sano H. Takatsu T, Giucchi B. Russel CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of resin- infiltrated deminerized human dentin. J Dent Res 74: 1093-1102, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740041001
  39. Sano H and Takatsu T. Giucleakage with the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18-25. 1995
  40. Burrow MF, Tagami J, Hosoda H. The long term durability of bond strengtrhs to dentin, Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 40: 173-191, 1993
  41. Eliades GC. Caputo AA. Vougiouklakis GJ. Composition. wetting, properties and bond strength with dentin of 6 new dentin adhesives, Dent Mater 1: 170-176, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80012-9
  42. Gwinnet AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/ hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 6:79, 1994