Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensor Placement Method for Damage Identification

균열 진단을 위한 센서 위치 선정

  • Published : 2007.04.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Sensor placement method for damage identification has been developed for model updating using Taguchi method. In order to select the optimal sensor location, the analysis of variance of objective function using orthogonal array was carried out. Then, modal data at the selected locations were used for damage identification using model updating. The numerical model of a cantilever beam was used in order to compare the damage identification results with conventional sensor location method.

Keywords

References

  1. Doebling, S. W., Farra, C. R, Prime, M. B. and Shevitz, D. W., 1996, 'Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes In Their Vibration Characteristics: a Literature Review', Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-13070-MS
  2. Friswell, M. I. and Mottershead, J. E., 1995, Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  3. Kwon, K. S. and Lin, R. M., 2005, 'Finite Element Model Updating using Taguchi Method', Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 280, No. 1-2, pp. 77-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.12.013
  4. Kwon, K. S. 2006, 'Damage Assessment of Structures using Taguchi method', Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 720-728 https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2006.16.7.720
  5. Yu, T. K. and Seinfeld, J. H., 1973, 'Observability and Optimal Measurement Locations in Linear Distributed Parameter Systems', International Journal of Control, 18, pp. 885-799
  6. Kubrusly, C. S. and Malebranche, H, 1985, 'Sensors and Controllers Location in Distributed Systems a Survey', Automatica, 52, pp. 141-52
  7. Penny, J. E. T. et al, 1994, 'Automatic Choice of Measurement Locations for Dynamic Testing', AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp.407-414 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11998
  8. Breitfeld, T, 1995, 'A Method for Identification of a Set of Optimal Points for Experimental Modal Analysis', Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Nashville, Tennessee
  9. Kammer, D. C., 1991, 'Sensor Placement for On-orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures', Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 14, pp. 199-196
  10. Kammer, D. C., 1992, 'Effects of Noiseon Sensor Placement for On-orbit Modal Identification of Large Space Structures', Transactions ASME, Journal of Dynamical Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 436-443 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897366
  11. Reynier, M. and Abou-Kandil, H, 1999, 'Sensors Location for Updating Problems', Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 297-314
  12. Stabb, M. and Blelloch, P., 1995, 'A Genetic Algorithm for Optimally Selecting Accelerometer Locations', Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Nashville, Tennessee
  13. Yao, L, Setheres, W. A. Kammer, D. C., 1993, 'Sensor Placement for On-orbit Modal Identification via a Genetic Algorithm', AIAA Journal, Vol. 31, pp, 1167-1169 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49057
  14. Worden, K. and Burrows, A. P., 2001, 'Optimal Sensor Placement for Fault Detection', Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, pp. 885-901 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00118-8
  15. Shi, Z. Y., Law, S. S. and Zhang, L. M., 2000, 'Optimum Sensor Placement for Structural Damage Detection', Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 11 pp. 1173-1179 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:11(1173)
  16. Taguchi, G., 1986, Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization
  17. Sloane, N. J. A., 2006, Website: http://www.research.att.com/~njas/oadir/index.html. A Library of Orthogonal Array