Thermal Environment Characteristics of Permeable Block Pavements for Landscape Construction

조경용 투수성 블록 포장의 열환경 특성

  • Han Seung-Ho (Institute of Landscape Ecological Design, HANDSEL GREEN Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Ryu Nam-Hyong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Jinju National University) ;
  • Kang Jin-Hyoung (Institute of Landscape Ecological Design, HANDSEL GREEN Co., Ltd.)
  • 한승호 ((주)한설그린 부설 조경생태디자인연구소) ;
  • 류남형 (진주산업대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 강진형 ((주)한설그린 부설 조경생태디자인연구소)
  • Published : 2006.06.01

Abstract

This study aims to measure and to analyze the thermal environment characteristics of the various permeable pavement materials such as grass pavement (GREEN BLOCK PARK), stone and grass pavement (GREEN BLOCK STEP), stone pavement (GREEN BLOCK MOSAIC) and wood pavement (WOOD BLOCK) under the summer outdoor environment. The thermal environment characteristics measured in the study includes the changes of surface temperature during the day, changes of the temperature on each pavement layer, and long and short wave radiation of each pavement surface. The experimental condition is based on the data on the hottest temperature (August 5, 2005, $34.0^{\circ}C$) of the you. Some of main findings are: 1) The heat environment was worse on the wood pavements than on the stone pavement. This is mainly due to the low albedo of the wood pavements (0.37) while the albedo value of stone pavements is 0.41. Small heat capacity of the wood pavements also contributes to this difference. 2) The heat environment was worse on the stone pavements than on the turf pavements. This was mainly due to the evapotranspiration of the plant growth layer of the turf pavements. 3) The peak surface temperature was the highest on the wood pavements ($56.1^{\circ}C$). The peak surface temperatures on the stone pavements, the stone-grass pavements and the grass pavements were $43.1^{\circ}C,\;40.1^{\circ}C\;and\;37.9^{\circ}C$, respectively. 4) To improve the thermal environments in the urban area, it is recommended to raise the albedo of the pavements by brightening the surface color of the pavement materials. Further studies on the pavement materials and the construction methods which can enhance the continuous evapotranspiration from the pavements surface are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 류남형, 유병림 (2005) 투.보수성 시멘트 콘크리트 포장의 열환경 특성(I). 한국조경학회지 32(6): 84-94
  2. 木內 豪, 小林裕明(1999) 快適な都市環境創造のたぬの鋪裝の 高溫化抑制策に關する檢討. 土木學會論文集 622(VII-11): 23-33
  3. 福田萬代, 深澤邦彦, 荒木美民, 蕂野毅, 淺技隆(1997) 夏季自然狀態での各種鋪裝の熱環境緩和特性に關する實驗的硏究. 土木學會論文集 571(V-36): 149-158
  4. 福田萬代, 越川喜孝, 辻井 豪, 淺技隆, 蕂野毅(1999a) 夏季に給.散水した保水性鋪裝の熱環境緩和特性に關する實驗的硏究. 土木學會論文集 613(V-42): 225-236
  5. 福田萬代, 漢技隆, 蕂野毅(1999b) 冬季自然狀態における保水性鋪裝の熱環境緩和特生に關する實驗的硏究. 土木學會論文集 634(V-45): 243-254邦
  6. 西岡 眞捻, 鎬島美奈子, 三木信博. 津鄕俊二(2002) 保水性鋪裝材科の熱的性能に關する實驗. 日本建築學會大會學術講演梗槪集 pp. 565-566
  7. 成田健一, 關根 毅(1991) アスファルト鋪裝面の表面溫度と 熱收支の解析. 地理學評論 64(A-2): 125-137
  8. 神田 學, 土屋信夫(1995) 微氣象に基ついた屋外における人體 の熱環境解釋. 土木學會論文集 509(II-30): 53-44
  9. 越川喜孝, 辻井 豪, 吉田健二(2001) 透水性を有する保水性鋪裝材に關する檢討. 土木學會第56回年次學術講演會 V-088:176-177
  10. 伊藤幸廣, 松浦誠司, 辻 正哲(1996) 地表面溫度低減機能を有するイン夕一口ツキグブ口ック鋪裝に 關する硏究. 土木學會論文集 544(V-32): 11-20
  11. 亦川宏幸, 小宮英孝(2000) 表面を連續的に濕潤できる鋪裝體に關する實驗的硏究. 日本建築學會計劃系論文集 530: 79-85
  12. 田中孝典(1998) 步行環境 に影響を及ぼす步行者系道路鋪裝材の熱特性. 土木學會論文集 587(VII-6): 49-58
  13. 淺技隆, ヴ 夕 ン 力, 北原正代(1991) 道路鋪裝の熱環境に及ぼす影響. 環境システム硏究 19: 89-93
  14. Asaeda T., V. T. Ca. and A Wakio(1996) Heat storage of pavement and its effect on the lower atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment 30(3): 413-427 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)00140-5
  15. Asaeda, T. and V. T. Ca(2000) Characteristics of permeable pavement during hot summer weather and impact on the thermal environment. Building and Environment 35: 363-375 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00020-7
  16. Pomerantz. M., B. Pon, H. Akbari. and S. C. Chang(2000) The Effect of Pavement's Temperatures on Air Temperature in Large Cities. Berkeley CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  17. Porte-Agel. F., M. B. Parlange, A T. Cahill, and A Gruber (2000) Mixture of time scales in evaporation: desorption and self-similarity of energy fluxes. Agronomy Journal 92: 832-836 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925832x