Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

Integrated Approaches of Health Impact Assessment as part of Environmental Assessment in Korea

한국에서 환경평가의 부분으로서 건강영향평가의 통합적 접근에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Im-Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Park, Joo-Hyun (Kwangwoon Strategic Environmental Assessment Institute, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Han, Sang-Wook (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University)
  • 김임순 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 박주현 (광운대학교 광운전략환경평가연구소) ;
  • 한상욱 (광운대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2006.07.28
  • Accepted : 2006.10.13
  • Published : 2006.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

During the last decade, Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has been discussed worldwide as being an important tool for the development of healthy public policy. HIA has been advanced as a means of bringing potential health impacts to the attention of policy makers, particularly in sectors where health impacts may not otherwise be considered. HIA, a systematic assessment of potential health impacts of proposed public polices, programs, and projects, offers a means to advance population health by bringing public health research to bear on questions of public policy. In Korea, health-related items under current EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) system can only be found in the categories of hygiene and public health. However, environment and public health are not adequately connected and also health is underestimated even though health is an important objective component for the implementation of Environmental Assessments (EA). As a result, health is not well integrated within criteria for investigating the impacts on environment. This study examines linkages for HIA from the related and relatively well-developed field of Prior Environmental Review System (PERS) which is similar to SEA and EIA in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 김임순,김윤신,김대선,서용석,최원욱,한상욱, 2003, 한국에서의 지속성의 구현을 위한 건 강영향평가팀 도입방안,한국EHS평가학회지,1(1), 59-93
  2. 김임순,한상욱,2005, 대안적 환경평가시스템 연 구; 통합적 의사결정을 위한 새로운 개념의 영향평가모형 (APEMI IA MODEL)의 국내 적용방안 탐색,환경영향평가학회지,14(4), 3-5
  3. 김임순,김충곤,강선홍,한상욱,2005, 지속성을 위한 보건영향평가의 국제적인 동향 고찰 및 환경영향평가와의 연계방안 연구,환경영향평가학회지,14(5),1-15
  4. 김임순,한상욱,김혜삼,강선홍,김대권,2006,한 국에서의 EIA와 EMS의 연계방안 연구,환경영향평가학회지,15(3),165-178
  5. 김임순,한상욱,박주현,2006, 유럽연합의 EA에 비춰본 한국의 환경평가제도 개선 방안,환경영향평가학회지,15(2), 139-155
  6. 조일형,박재홍,김임순,한상욱,2003,환경영향평 가에 있어서 보건영향평가의 방법,절차 및 적용에 관한 연구,환경영향평가학회지, 12(3), 211-228
  7. 한상욱,2004, 전략환경평가의 현재와 미래: 전략 환경평가의 세계적인 동향과 국내 도입에 따른 시사점,춘계환경영향평가학회 학술발 표기조연설
  8. 환경부,2004,환경영향평가서 작성 등에 관한규 정,환경부
  9. 환경부,2005a,주요 개발 사업에 대한 건강영향 저 감방안,환경부,63, 79-124
  10. 환경부,2005b, 환경보건정책 10개년 종합계획 연구,환경부
  11. Asian Development Bank, 1992, Guidelines for Social Analysis of Development Projects, Manila, The Philippines, 3-7
  12. ATSDR(The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2002, Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual(Update), Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registty Atlanta, Georgia, 1-7
  13. Brian L. Cole, et. al., 2004, Prospects for Health Impact Assessment in the United States: New and Improved Environmental Impact Assessment or Something Different Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 29, No. 6
  14. Birley, M., 1999, Procedures and Methods for Health Impact Assessment, 11-44
  15. BMA(British Medical Association), 1994, The Health Impact Assessment of Development projects
  16. Council of the European Communities, 1997, Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment
  17. Council of the European Communities, 2001, Council Directive (200l/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment
  18. EPHIA, 2004, European Policy Health Impact Assessment, 4, 8
  19. Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: The Basics, Volume 1, 15-20
  20. Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: Approaches and Decision-Making, Volume 2, 13-14
  21. Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: The Multidisciplinary Team, Volume 3, 2728
  22. Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: Health Impacts by Industry Sector, Volume 4, 17-18
  23. IAIA, 1999, Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, 1-4
  24. IAIA, 2002, Strategic Environmental Assessment Performance Criteria, Special Publication Series No.1
  25. IAIA, 2002, The linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda and Recommendations for Actions, 1-12
  26. IAIA, 2003, International Principles for Social Impact Assessment, Special Publication Series No. 2, 1-8
  27. IAIA, 2005, Biodiversity in Impact Assessment, Special Publications Series No.3, 1-4
  28. IAIA, 2006, Public Participation International Best Practice Principles, Special Publications Series No.4, 1-3
  29. IAIA, 2006, Health Impact Assessment International Best Practice Principles, Special Publications Series No.5, 1-4
  30. Larry W., Canter, 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment, Mc. Graw-Hill, 532-534
  31. Mahoney M., Durham G., 2002, Health Impact Assessment: a tool for policy development in Australia, report for the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Deakin University, 27-43
  32. Mary Mahoney, jenny-Lynn Potter, 2004, Integrating Health Impact Assessment into the Triple Bottom Line Concept, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 151-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.005
  33. Memorandum of Understanding between the International Association for Impact Assessment and the World Health Organization, 2000, 1-3
  34. Public Health Advisory Committee, 2005, A Guide to Health Impact Assessment: A Policy Tool for New Zealand, 2nd Edition, 3-5
  35. Public Health Commission, 1995, A Guide to Health Impact Assessment, New Zealand, 6-8
  36. Rainer Fehr, 1999, Environmental Health Impact Assessment, Evaluation of a Ten-Step Model, UNECE, 2003, Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, 1-14
  37. The Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment, 2003, US principles and guidelines Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, volume 21, number 3, 231-250 https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766293
  38. UNEP, 2002, EIA Training Resource Manual. 410-545
  39. UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach, 113-146
  40. UNECE, 2003, Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
  41. US DOE, 1993, Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statement. Epidemiology September, Vol. 10, No. 3
  42. WHO, 1999, Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach, Gothenburg consensus paper, 1-11
  43. WHO, 2001, Health Impact Assessment in Development Policy and Planning, Report of an Informal WHO Consultative Meeting, 11-13
  44. WHO, 2001, Health Impact Assessment as part of Strategic Environmental Assessment, 10, 14
  45. WHO, 2004, European Policy Health Impact Assessment, 4-9