The Stability of K-BSID-II Performance: A Longitudinal Study

한국 Bayley 영유아 발달검사수행의 안정성: 종단 연구

  • 박혜원 (울산대학교 아동.가정복지) ;
  • 신민선 (울산대학교 아동.가정복지)
  • Published : 2006.02.28

Abstract

This study followed the standardization study pool of K-BSID-II to examine the stability of K-BSID-II. One hundred and ninety five infants aged from 1-42 months tested twice with intervals of 5-16 month between tests. All participants had been full-term babies without any medical complications. There were no significant differences between the groups which were divided in terms of demographic variables such as mothers' education, infants' birth order and gender. The stability of K-BSID-II was significant and that of the mental scale was lower than that of the psycho-motor scale: There were high stabilities between raw scores in two sessions(r=.91 for the mental scale and r=.89 for the psycho-motor scale) but there were significant but low correlations between mental index scores(r=.18, p<.05) and psycho-motor index scores(r=.17, p<.05). The stability was increased with initial test age and mothers' education. It was recommended for testers and researchers to use both raw scores and index scores for better interpretations in future research.

Keywords

References

  1. 강순구, 조윤경(1994). 포테이지 아동발달 지침서. 서울: 특수교육
  2. 김숙현, 이경옥(2001). 영아발달체크리스트 표준화연구. 2001. 한국유아교육학회 연차학술대회
  3. 김승국, 김옥기(1985). 사회성숙도 검사 요강. 서울: 중앙적성출판사
  4. 대한소아과학회(2002). 한국형 영유아발달검사. 서울: 대한소아과학회
  5. 민동옥, 박혜원(2003). 조산아에 대한 베일리 영유아발달검사 실시 및 채점 방식에 관한 연구. 한국 아동학회 추계학술대회
  6. 박혜원, 곽금주, 박광배(1995). 웩슬러 유아지능검사의 수행분석: 형제관계를 중심으로. 아동학회지, 22(1), 57-69
  7. 박혜원, 조복희(미출간원고). 한국 Bayley 영유아 발달검사: 해석지침서
  8. 박혜원, 조복희, 최호정(2003). 한국 Bayley 영유아 발달검사 (K-BSID-II) 표준화연구: 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 16(4), 12-134
  9. 배윤희(2001). 베일리 영유아발달 검사-II의 한국 표준화를 위한 예비연구. 울산대학교 석사학위논문
  10. 이일섭(1992). Bayley 발달검사를 이용한 고위험 저출생체중아의 발달평가. 연세대학교 석사학위논문
  11. 정문자(1983). 유아발달을 위한 가정방문 프로그램 연구. 대한가정학회지, 21(4), 129-137
  12. 정문자, 이은해, 박경자(1993). 베일리 유아발달 척도의 한국 표준화를 위한 예비연구. 아동학회지, 14(1), 5-21
  13. 정영미(1992). Bayley 발달검사를 이용한 유아의 발달평가, 연세대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  14. 제경숙(1984). 베일리의 유아발달검사의 척도화를 위한 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문
  15. 조복희, 박혜원(2004). 한국 Bayley 영유아발달검사(KBSID-II) 표준화연구(1): 지역, 성별 및 모의 교육 수준에 따른 수행분석. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17(1), 191-206
  16. Aggarwal, P., Chaudhari, S., Bhave, S., Pandit, A., Barve, S. (1998). Clinical predictors of outcome in hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in term infants. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 18, 117-121 https://doi.org/10.1080/02724936.1998.11747937
  17. Baird, M., & Folsom, J. (1993). Concurrent validity of the Kent Scoring Adaptation of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Diagnostique, 18(2), 135-143 https://doi.org/10.1177/153450849301800204
  18. Banks, M., & Ginsburg, A. (1985). Infant visual preferences: A review and new theoretical treatment. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (19, 207-246). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
  19. Bayley, N. (1932). A study of the crying of infants during mental and physical tests. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40, 306-329 https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1932.10532428
  20. Bayley, N. (1933a). Mental growth during the first three years. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 14, 1-92
  21. Bayley, N. (1933b). The California First-Year Mental Scale. Berkeley: University of California Press
  22. Bayley, N. (1935). The development of motor abilities during the first three years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
  23. Bayley, N. (1936). The California Infant Scale of Motor Development. Berkeley: University of California Press
  24. Bayley, N. (1965). Comparisons of mental and motor test scores for age, 1 - 15 months by sex, birth order, race, geographical location, and education of parents. Child Development, 36, 379-411 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1965.tb05279.x
  25. Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation
  26. Bayley, N. (1970). Development of mental abilities. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1163-1209). New York: Wiley
  27. Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation
  28. Black, M. M., & Matula, K. (1999). Essentials of Bayley Scales of Infant Development II Assessment. New York: Wiley & Sons
  29. Brody, N. (1993). Intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press
  30. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Weinraub, M. (1983). Origins of infant intelligence testing. Origins of intelligence: Infancy and early childhood (2nd ed, 25-66). In M. Lewis (Ed.) New York: Plenum Press
  31. Campbell, S. K., Siegel, E., Parr, C. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1986). Evidence for the need to renorm the Bayley Scale of Infant Development based on the performance of population-based sample of 12-month-old infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1177/027112148600600208
  32. Fantz, R., & Fagan, J. (1975). Visual attention to size and number of pattern details by term and preterm infants during the first six months. Child Development, 46, 3-18 https://doi.org/10.2307/1128828
  33. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, D. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  34. Goldstein, D. J., Fogle, E. E., Wieber, J. L., & O'Shea, T. M. (1995). Comparison of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with premature infants. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 391-396 https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299501300406
  35. Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality. New York: Basic Book
  36. Johnson, L. J., Cook, M. J., & Kullman, A. J. (1992). An examination of the concurrent validity of the Battelle Developmental Inventory as compared with the Vineland Adaptive Scales and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Journal of Early Invention, 16(4), 353-359 https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519201600406
  37. King, W., & Seegmiller, B. (1973). Performance of 14-to 22- month-old black first-born infants on two tests of cognitive development: The Bayley Scales. Developmental Psychology, 8, 317-326 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034333
  38. McCall, R. (1983). A conceptual approach to early mental development. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Origins of intelligence (2nd Ed.). New York: Plenum
  39. McChesne, S. (1995). Concurrent validity of the Fagan test of infant intelligence with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for infants from low socioeconomic and middle to upper socioeconomic status. University of South Carolina
  40. Miller, S. (1987). Developmental research methods. New York: Prentice Hall
  41. Nellis, L., & Gridley, B. E. (1994). Review of the Bayley Scale of Infant Development-Second Edition. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 201-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(94)90011-6
  42. Rubin, B. G. (1996). A Test-retest study of the mental scale of the Bayley Scales of infant development: Second-age children with significant developmental disabilities. Temple University
  43. Sabourin, J. A. (1996). The stability of IQ in a clinicreferred child sample as measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant development, the Griffiths mental development scales and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Laurentian University of Sudbury (Canada)
  44. Snow, C., & McGaha, C. (3rd. Ed.) (2003). Infant development. New York: Prentice Hall
  45. Zajonc, R., & Markus, G. (1975). Birth order and intellectual development. Psychological Review, 82, 74-88 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076229