Comparison of Formaldehyde Emission Rate and Formaldehyde Content from Rice Husk Flour Filled Particleboard Bonded with Urea-Formaldehyde Resin

  • Lee, Young-Kyu (National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sumin (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Dept of Environmental Materials Science Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joong (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Dept of Environmental Materials Science Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hwa Hyoung (Department of Forest Products, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, Dong-Won (Department of Building Equipment & System Engineering, Kyungwon University)
  • Received : 2006.04.03
  • Accepted : 2006.08.02
  • Published : 2006.09.25

Abstract

The this study, the effect of rice husk flour (RHF) as scavenger on formaldehyde emission rate and formaldehyde content from urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin bonded RHF content wood particleboards (PB). Two type of particle size ($30{\mu}m$ and $300{\mu}m$) of RHF was premixed with the UF resin at 5% and 15% by weight. The performance of UF resins is greatly influenced by the curing characteristics in their curing processing. The curing behavior was monitored activation energy ($E_a$) by DSC and pH variation according to RHF contents. PB with dimensions of $27cm{\times}27cm{\times}0.7cm$ was prepared at a specific gravity of 0.75 using $E_1$ and $E_2$ class UF resins. Formaldehyde emission and formaldehyde content from RHF filled PB bonded with UF resin was measured by 24 h desiccator and perforator method, respectively. RHF causes an increased pH of UF resin. $E_a$ of the modified UF resin decreased independently of RHF particle size. As the pH and the $E_a$ variation of the UF resin containing RHF increased, the amount of formaldehyde content decreased. The formaldehyde emission and formaldehyde content levels of the PB bonded with 15 wt% of $30{\mu}m$ RHF and $E_2$ type UF resin were low and satisfied grade $E_1$, as measured by 24 h desiccator and perforator method. The result of a comparison between 24 h desiccator and perforator test using PB showed that the linear regression analyses show a good correlation between the results for the 24 h desiccator and the perforator tests. The linear regression of a correlation between the desiccator and the perforator was Y=4.842X-0.064 ($R^2=0.989$). RHF was effective at reducing formaldehyde emission and formaldehyde content in urea-formaldehyde adhesives when used as scavenger.

Keywords

References

  1. Allan GG, J. Dutkicwiz, and E. Gilmartin. 1980. Long term stability of urea formaldehyde foam insulation. Enviro. Sci. Technol. 14.1235-1240 https://doi.org/10.1021/es60170a003
  2. ASTM. 2001. ASTM D 1583-01. Standard test methods for hydrogen ion concentration of dry adhesive films. Annual book of ASTM standards. American society for testing and materials, West Conshohocken, PA
  3. Della VP, I. Kuhn, and D. Hotza. 2002. Rice husk ash as an alternate source for active silica production. Materials Letters. 57(4): 818-821 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00879-0
  4. Higuchi M and I. Sakata. 1979. Studies on the improvement of urea-formaldehyde resin adhesives I. Mokuxai Gakkaishi 25(7): 496-502
  5. Hse CY, ZY. Xia, and B. Tomita. 1994. Effects of reaction pH on properties and performance of urea-formaldehyde resins. Holzforschung 48: 527-532 https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.6.527
  6. Japanese Industrial Standard. 2001. JIS A 1460, Building boards determination of formaldehyde emission desiccator method, Japanese Industrial Standards Association
  7. Kim H-J and YG. Eom. 2001. Thermogravimetric analysis of rice husk flour for a new material of lignocellulosic fiber-thermoplastic polymer composites. J. of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 29(3): 59-67
  8. Myers GE. 1982. Hyderlytic stability of cured urea-formaldehyd resin. Wood Sci. 15(2): 127-138
  9. Myers GE. 1984. How mole ratio of UF resin affects formaldehyde emission and other properties: A literature critique. Forest Prod. J. 34(5): 35-41
  10. Myers GE. 1985. Effect of separate additions to furnish or veneer on formaldehyde emission and other properties: a literature review (1960-1984). Forest Prod. J. 35(6): 57-62
  11. Myers GE. 1986. Effects of post-manufacture board treatments on formaldehyde emission: a literature review (1960-1984). Forest Prod. J. 36(6):41-51
  12. Myers GE. 1990. Formaldehyde liberation and cure behavior of urea-formaldehyde resins. Holzforschung. 44, 117-126 https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1990.44.2.117
  13. Koutsky JA and GE. Myers. 1987. Procedure for measuring formaldehyde liberation from formaldehyde-based resins. Forest Prod. J. 37(9) 56-60
  14. Szesztay M, Z. Laszlo-Hedvig, E. Kovacsovics and F. Tudos. 1993. DSC application for characterization of urea/formaldehyde condensates. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff. 51, 297-300 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663798
  15. Talcin N and V. Sevinc. 2001. Studies on silica obtained from rice husk. Ceramics International. 27: 219-224 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(00)00068-7
  16. Velikonja S, I. Jarc, L. Zupancic-Kralj, and J. Marsel. 1995. Comparison of gas chromatographic and spectrophotometric techniques for the determination of formaldehyde in water. J. Chromatography A 704(2): 449-454 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00049-S