Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

Possibility and Limitations of New Framework of Landscape Ecology

경관 생태 연구의 새로운 방법론 모색을 통한 도입 가능성과 한계성

  • Ra Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2005.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to overview foreign trends in the study of the landscape ecology through new framework of landscape ecological studies and to suggest possibility and limitation of introduction of landscape ecology studies in Korea. Because of historical reasons rooted in different disciplines, landscape ecology of the present time is not unified at all. Therefore, landscape ecology should be understood in an integrative manner accommodating different views and various aspects of landscape(NOOS, GEOS, BIOS). Facing the increasing environmental problems and the goal of sustainable landscape, the principle of a holistic approach complementarity and transdisciplinarity outlined in this paper (esp. connection physical-materials and cognitive system) might help to understand the characteristics of landscapes and landscape ecology. Important steps towards this direction are the landscape survey, diagnosis, the identification of landscape functions, the development of landscape evaluation models and landscape planning system. Recently there have been a few landscape ecological researches in Korea, which tells there have been strong needs to solve practical landscape problems caused by the rapid socioeconomic growth for several decades. However, almost of this studies are focused on cognitive and visual aspects of landscapes defined boundaries of disciplines. But for more holistic approach complementarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape ecological studies, many other aspects such as the consideration of geoecological and bioecologocal variables, preperation of ecological basic data(mapping) and the development of landscape planning as a tool for practical application should be integrated into the whole landscape system.

Keywords

References

  1. 공우석(1997a) 지리학에서의 경관분석. 한국경관생태연구회 창립기념 심포지움 초록집. pp. 15-22
  2. 공우석(1997b) 산지보존을 위한 경관생태지리적 접근. 자연 보존 98: 36-42
  3. 공우석(2000) 설악산 아고산대 식생과 지생태. 대한지리학회지 34(1)
  4. 김민수, 고영근, 임홍빈, 이승재(1991) 국어대사전: 금성출판사. p. 162
  5. 김일부, 이민부, 박승규, 전종한(1999) 한국 산지촌의 실태와 진흥방안에 관한 연구(I): 강원남부 지역의 산지촌을 사례로 한 경관생태학적 접근. 대한지리학회지 34(1)
  6. 나정화(1997a) 한.독간의 자연환경보전법 비교분석(I): 목적, 기본원칙, 침해규정을 중심으로. 한국환경정책학회지 5(1): 69-91
  7. 나정화(1997b) 한.독간의 자연환경보전법 비교분석(II):자연환경보전계획규정을 중심으로. 한국환경정책학회지 5(2):91-114
  8. 나정화, 이석철(2000) 대도시의 비오톱 구조분석: 자연체험 및 휴양의 관점에서. 한국조경학회지 28(3): 72-87
  9. 나정화, 이정민(2003) 경관생태적 측면에서의 도시 에코톱의 분류방법 및 특성분석. 한국환경과학회지 12(12): 1215-1225
  10. 서규환, 심광섭, 노진철, 김기욱, 최문규 역(1995) 소통행위이론. Harbermas, J.. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 서울: 의암출판. pp 123-132
  11. 서울특별시(2000) 서울시 비오톱 현황조사 및 생태도시 조성 지침 수립. 1차년도 연구보고서
  12. 안계복(1982) 미학이론에 기초한 경관평가에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 10(2): 53-60
  13. 이도원(2001) 경관생태학. 환경계획과 설계, 관리를 위한 공간생리. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부
  14. 이도원, 신준환, 강신규(2003) 백두대간 체계안에 내포된 유역 개념과 문제점. 한국생태학회지 26(4)
  15. 이창석, 유영한(2001) 한국의 문화경관, 그 실체, 변화와 새로운 패러다임에 의한 가치평가. 한국생태학회지 24(5): 323-332
  16. 임승빈(1986) 환경심리. 행태론. 서울: 보성문화사
  17. 임승빈(1988) 경관분석 및 평가방법에 관한 연구: 현상학적 접근. 한국조경학회지 16(1): 43-51
  18. 임승빈(1991) 경관분석론. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부
  19. 원학희, 공우석(1998) 지리학에서의 경관분석. 지리학총 25: 65-92
  20. 조정송, 황기원, 박재길(1998) 한국 도시경관의 새로운 계획 파라다임: 미학적 사고의 가능성 모색. 한국조경학회지 25(4): 61-81
  21. 주신하, 임승빈(2000) 경관평가연구의 국내외 동향. 한국조경학회지 28(2): 50-57
  22. 최창조(1984) 한국의 풍수사상. 서울: 민음사. pp.71-74
  23. 한국경관 생태 연구회(2001) 경관생태학. 서울: 동화기술
  24. 한국조경학회(2004) 자연경관계획 및 관리. 서울: 문운당
  25. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회(2004) 경관생태학. 서울: 보문당
  26. 홍선기, 이창석(1997) 생태학의 새로운 분야로서 경관생태학의 발전과 역할. 한국생태학회지 20: 217-227
  27. 홍선기, 김동엽 역(2000) 토지모자이크: 지역 및 경관생태학. Form, R. T. T., Land Mosaics. 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부
  28. 홍선기, 임영득, 中越信和. 장남기(2000) 한국 농산촌경관의 구조와 이질성 및 다양성의 최근변화: 경관의 보전과 복원과의 관계. 한국생태학회지 23(5): 359-368
  29. 홍성조(2000) 지형경관과 삶의 질: 환경문제에 대한 지형학의 역할과 전망. 대한지리학회지 35(2).
  30. 황기원(1987) 경관의 다의성에 관한 고찰. 한국조경학회지 17(1): 55-68
  31. 황기원(1993) 도시경관과 도시계획. 한국조경학회지 21(3) : 117-121
  32. 황기원(1995) 경과 관련 술어의 개념에 관한 고찰: 관련된 한 자어의 해석을 중심으로. 한국조경학회지 22(4): 23-36
  33. 系賀黎(1986) 景觀研究系譜. 造園雜誌 50(2)
  34. 木原啟吉, 進士五十八(1985)- 景山河計劃: 思考社
  35. 上杉武夫(1981) 造園の風景構造論的 研究. 日本 京都大學 博士學位論文
  36. 沼田 眞(1996) 景相生態學. 朝倉書店. pp. 1-7
  37. 小柳武和, 篠原 修(1976) 景觀論. 彰國社版. p 132
  38. 熊谷洋一(1986) 景觀特集. 造園雜誌 50(2)
  39. 進士五十八, 外崎公知(1990) 景觀行政の 現況と展望. 造國雜誌 53(2)
  40. 篠原 修(1984) 土木景觀計劃. 技報堂出版
  41. 中村良夫(1982) 風景學入門. 東京: 中央公論社
  42. 樋口忠彥(1975) 景觀の 構造. 技報堂出版
  43. 橫山秀司(1995) 景觀生態學. 古今書院
  44. Agger, P. and J. Brandt(1988) Dynamics of small biotopes in danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 1: 227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157695
  45. Ahem, J. F.(1999) Barriers, Opportunities. Strategies and Models for the Application of Landscape Ecology in Landscape Planning and Design. In 5. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Snowmass. USA
  46. Allen, T. F. H(1992) Toward a Unified Ecology. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 10-15
  47. Antrop, M.(1981) Landscape as a Holistic Entity Seen by Remote Sensing. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp, 314-316
  48. Antrop, M. and V. V. Eetvelde(2000) Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 43-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00079-7
  49. Bastian, O. and A. Bemhardt(1993) Anthropogenic landscape changes in central Europe and the role of bioindication. Landscape Ecology 8: 139-151 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141593
  50. Bastian, O. und K. F. Schreiber (1994) Analyse und Okologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Jena. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer
  51. Baumgartner, R.(1981) The Visual Landscape-Inventory and Evaluation from the Visual (Aesthetic) Perspective. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 318-320
  52. Bell, S. (1999) Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. London: E and FN Spon
  53. Burke. V. J.(2000) Landscape ecology and species conservation. Landscape Ecology 15: 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008156303757
  54. Cervantes, J. F., E. Salinas-Chavez, and M. Rodriguez(1999) Landscape Ecology: Geographical Orientation or an Interdisciplinary Research Programme in Cuba and Mexico. In 5. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Snowmass. USA
  55. Dramstad, W. E., J. D. Olson and R. T. T. Forman(1996) Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land Use Planning. Washington D. C.: Island Press
  56. Eckbo, G.(1969) The Landscape We See. New York, Toronto. London, Sydney: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company
  57. Ermer, K., R. Hoff, und R. Mohrmann(1996) Landschaft-splanung in der Stadt. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer
  58. Fairbanks, D. H. K., A. S. Van Jaarsveld and R. B. Norgaard(1999) Development of a Coevolutionary Landscape Ecology Framework for Analysing the Sustainability of Biodiversity Conservation. In 5. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Snowmass. USA
  59. Farina, A.(1998) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. London UK: Chapman and Hall. pp. 234-236
  60. Finke, L.(1978) Landschaftsokologie: was sie ist, was sie will. was sie kann? Umschau in Wissenschaft und Technik 78: 568
  61. Finke, L.(1992) Angewandte Landschaftsokologie, Geographische Heute 100: 7
  62. Finke, L.(1994) Lendscbaftsokologie: das geographische Seminar. Braunschweig: Westermann
  63. Forman, R. T. T.(1981) Interaction among Landscape Elements: A Core of Landscape Ecology. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 35-45
  64. Forman, R. T. T. and M. Godron(1986) Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley
  65. Forman, R. T. T.(1985) Land Mosaics: the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  66. Froment, A. (1981) Landscape Evaluation in the New Land Consolidation Process in Belgium In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 139-141
  67. Gilbert. O. L.(1991) The Ecology of Urban Habitats. London: Chapman and Hall
  68. Haase, G.(1999) Beitrage zur landschaftsanalyse und landschaftsdiagnose, Hirzel. Stuttgart. Leipzig. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klusse 59(1)
  69. Haber, W.(1972) Grundzuge einer okologischen theorie der landnutzungsplanung. Innere Kolonisation 21: 294-298
  70. Haber, W. and J. Schaller(1981) Landscape Model-Research Project in the Region of Ingolstadt. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp, 316-317
  71. Haeckel, E.(1866) Die Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Anatomie der Organismen, Band I. Berlin. pp. 574
  72. Hendinger, H.(1977) Landschaftsokologie, Westermanncolleg Raum+Gesellschaft Band 8. Braunschweig. pp. 108
  73. Heydemann, B,(1983) Vorschlag fur ein Biotopschut-zzonenkonzept am Beispiel Schleswig- Holsteins-Ausweisung von schutzwurdigen Okosystemen und Fragen ihrer Vernet-zung, Schriften DRL. Heft 41: 95-104
  74. Hobbs, R.(1997) Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00364-7
  75. Hof, G. T. A. (1981) A Physical Geographical Sulxlivision of the Netherlands on the Basis of Abiotic Characteristics. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 293-295
  76. Jacobs, P. and R. Mann(2000) Landscape prospects of the next millennium Landscape and Urban Planning 47: 129-133 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00081-X
  77. Jager, J. und M. Scheringer(1998) Transdisziplinaritat: problemorientierung ohne Methodenzwang, GAIA 7(1): 10-25 https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.7.1.4
  78. Jedicke, E.(1994) Biotopverbund: Grundlagen und Massnahmen einer neuen Naturschutzstrategie. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer
  79. Jung, C. Y.(1993) Nutzung Bedeutung und Planung der Freiraume in koreanischen Stadten: Erklarungsansatze aus deutscher Sicht. Beitrage zur raumlichen Planung, Heft 36. Hannover. pp, 34
  80. Kerkstra, K. and P. Vrijlandt(2003) Landscape planning for industrial agriculture: a proposed framework for rural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 18: 275-287 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90015-T
  81. Kiemstedt, H.(1971) Naturliche Beeintrachtigungen als Entscheidungsfaktoren fur die Planung, Landschaft und Stadt 3: 79-89
  82. Kiemstedt, H., T. Horlitz, und S. Ott(1993) Umsetzung von Zielen des Naturschutzes auf regionaler Ebene. Beitrage der ARL. Band 123
  83. Knaapen, J. P., M. Scheffer. and B. Harms(1992) Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 23: 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
  84. Knauer, N.(1981) Vegetationskunde und Landschaftsokologie, Heidelberg: UTB Nr. 941. pp. 315
  85. Lehmann, E.(1986) Wesen und Werk Alexander von Humboldts aus Geowissenschaftlicher Sicht. Berlin: Akadernie-Verlag. pp. 15-30
  86. Leser, H.(1976) Landschaftsokologie. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer
  87. Leser, H.(1983) Geookologie. Geographische Rundschau 35: 212-221
  88. Leser, H.(1991) Landschaftsokologie(3. Aufl.), UTB. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer
  89. Leser, H.(1997) Landschaftsokoiogie(4. Aufl.). UTB. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer
  90. Linehan, J., M. Gross, and J. Finn(1995) Greenway planning: developing a landscape ecological network approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 33: 179-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)02017-A
  91. Luetz, M. und O. Bastian(2000) Vom landschaftsplan zum bewirtschaftungsentwurf. Zeitschriften fur Kultechnik und Landentwicklung 41: 259-266
  92. Makhzoumi, J. and G. Pungetti(1999) Ecological Landscape Design and Planning: the Mediterranean Context. London and New York: E and FN Spon
  93. Makhzoumi, J. M.(2000) Landscape ecology as a foundation for landscape architecture: application in Malta. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 167-177 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00088-8
  94. Marks, R. (1975) 2ur landschaftsbewertung fur die erholung. Natur und Landschaft 50: 222-227
  95. Marks, R.(1979) Okologische Landschaftsanalyse und Landschaftsbewertung als Aufgaben der angewandten physischen Geographie, Bochum, Materialien zur Raumordnung XXI
  96. Marks, R., M. Muller, H. Leser, und H. J. Klink(1989) Anleitung zur Bewertung des Leistungsvermogens des Landschaftshaushaltes. Trier: Forschungen zur deutschen Landeskunde Band 229. Trier
  97. Marsh, W. M.(1998) Landscape Planning: Environmental Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons
  98. McHarg, I. L.(1969) Design with Nature. Garden City, New York: Natural History Press
  99. Mosimann, T. (1984) Landschaftsokologische Komplexanalyse, Wiesbaden
  100. Mosimann, T.(1990) Okotop als elementare Prozesseinheiten der Landschaft: Konzept zur Klassifikation von Okosystemen, Geosynthesis Heft 1
  101. Naveh, Z. and A. S. Lieberman(1993) Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application (2nd ed.), Berlin: Springer Verlag
  102. Naveh, Z. und J. Frohlich(1996) Die Anforderungen der postindustriellen Gesellschaft an die Landschaftsokologie als eine transdisziplinare, problemorientierte Wissenschaft. Die Erde 127: 235-249
  103. Neef, E. (1961) Landschaftsokologische Untersuchungen als Grundlage standortsgerechter Landnutzung, Die Naturwissenschaft 48: 348-354 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00623936
  104. Neef, E.(1963) Topologische und chorologische Arbeitsweisen in der Landschaftsforschung, PGM 107: 249-259
  105. Neef, E.(1967) Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Land-schaftslehre. Haack, Gotha: 152
  106. Neef, E.(1969) Der Stoffwechsel zwischen Natur und Gesellschaft als geographisches Problem. Geographische Rundschau 21: 453-459
  107. Neef, E.(1981) Stages in the Development of Landscape Ecology. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp, 19-28
  108. Norderhaug, A., M. Ihse, and O. Pedersen(2000) Biotope pattern and abundance of meadow plant species in a norweign rural landscape. Landscape Ecology 15: 201-218 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008141400166
  109. Pauleit, S. and F. Duhme(2000) Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape Ecology 52: 1-20
  110. Ra, J. H.(1998) Landscape Ecology: Principle, Concept and Application. Proceedings of the First Landscape Ecology Forum, Seoul: Korean Research Team of Landscape Ecology. pp. 40-43
  111. Rasmussen, R. O. and S. Folving(1981) Analysis and Mapping of Landscapes Based on Satellite-Images and Complex Landscape-Classification, In 1. IALE-World Congress (Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp, 296-298
  112. Richter, H.(1968) Naturraumliche Strukturmodelle. PGM 112: 9-14
  113. Riedel, W. und H. Lange(2001) Landschaftsplanung, Heidelberg. Berlin: Stektrum Akademischer Verlag
  114. Ruthsatz, B. and W. Haber(1981) The Significance of Small-Scale Landscape Elements in Rural Areas as Refuges for Endangered Plant Species. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract), Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp, 117-124
  115. Ruzicka, M. and L. Miklos(1990) Basic premises and methods in landscape ecological planning and optimization. In I. S. Zonneveld and R. T. T. Forman, eds., Changing Landscapes: an Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 233-260
  116. Sample, V. A.(1994) Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management. Washington, D. C.: Island Press. pp, 201-212
  117. Schmid, A. (1987) Grundlagen der Landschaftsplanung: Die Landschaft und Ihre Nutzung, Zurich: ORL. pp. 60-75
  118. Schmithusen, J. (1948) Fliesengefuge der Landschaft und Okotop: Vorschlage zur begrifflichen Ordnung und Nomenklatur in der Landschaftsforschung, BDL Band 5: 74-83
  119. Schmithusen, J.(1964) Was ist eine Landschaft. Erdkun-dliche Wissenschaft Heft 9: 24
  120. Schutzeichel, R.(1969) Althochdeutsches Worterbuch, Niemeyer. Tuebingen
  121. Selman, P.(1993) Landscape ecology and countryside planning: vision, theory and practice. Journal of Rural Studies 9: 1-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90002-2
  122. Stich, R., K. W. Porger, G. Steinebach, und A. Jacob(1992) Stadtokologie in Bebauungsplanen, Wiesbaden, Berlin: Bauverlag
  123. Stojigren, T. J., M. B. Coughenour, G. W. Chong. and D. Binkley(1997) Landscape analysis of plant diversity. Landscape Ecology 12: 155-170 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007986502230
  124. Sukopp, H. and S. Weiler (1988) Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 15: 39-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90015-1
  125. Sukopp, H. und R. Wittig(1998) Stadtokologie: Ein Fachbuch fur Studium und Praxis. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer
  126. Tress, B.(2000) Eine Theorie der Landschaft. In Planar-vortrag IALE-Deutschland. Tagungsband. Nurtingen, pp. 14-15
  127. Treu, M. C., M. Magoni, F. Steiner, and D. Palazzo(2000) Sustainable landscape planning for Cremona, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning 47: 79-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00065-1
  128. Troll, C. (1950) Die geographische Landschaft und ihre Forschung, Studium Generale 3: 163-181
  129. Troll, C. (1966) Landschaftsokologie als geographisch-synoptische Naturbetrachtung, Erdkundliche Wissenschaft Heft 11: 1-13
  130. Vink, A. P. A.(1981) Anthropocentric Landscape Ecology in Rural Areas. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven. Netherlands. pp. 87-97
  131. Vink, A. P. A., P. Van Hooff, C. Kwakernaak, and B. Pedroli(1981) Some Contributions of Physical Geography to Landscape Ecology. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 298-300
  132. Zonneveld, I. S. (1981) The Ecological Backdrop of Regional Geography. In 1. IALE-World Congress(Abstract). Veldhoven, Netherlands. pp. 67-70
  133. Zonneveld, I. S.(1989) The Land Unit: A Fundamental Concept in Landscape Ecology and Its Applications. Landscape Ecology 3: 67-86 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131171
  134. Zonneveld, I. S.(1995) Landscape Ecology: an Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Base for Land Evaluation. Land Management and Conservation. Amsterdam : SPA Academic Publishing. pp, 198-202