Landscape Analysis of Geographic Features of East Sea-gateway(東海口) in Shilla Dynasty

신라 동해구에 대한 지형.경관 분석

  • Ahn Gye-Bog (Department of Landscape Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Hwang Kook-Woong (Department of Landscape Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 안계복 (대구가톨릭대학교 자연대학 조경학과) ;
  • 황국웅 (대구가톨릭대학교 자연대학 조경학과)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

In order to reveal the geographical landscape's features of the East Sea-gateway(東海口), which has existed only in the era of Shilla as unique east path, we have carried out analysis of the old maps(邑誌圖) and satellite imagery, and geographical features analysis in the application of digital maps, and the result is as follows. 1. Analysis of materials from the Chosun dynasty describes landscapes called sea gates(海口) (note that this should not be capitalized); a place where the river meets the sea and the sea comes far into the land. Sea gate landscapes may have an island, but this is not a prerequisite. 2. According to the satellite imagery, the capital city of Shilla Dynasty had five passages. four or them are broad corridors, but one of them is narrow. The east side of the capital city is blocked by mountains and there was an important path which leads into the East Sea. 3. According to the cross section of the mountains, there is the only rule East-path. There was no alternative way. There was only one way-out to the east side from the capital city. This is the unique path which reaches a length of 28km. Judging from this, it seems that this path was called the East Sea-gateway. 4. The landscape of the East Sea-gateway was shaped like the letter 'V' and reached to the landscape of the sea gate. However, the route was blocked - part by the mountains, and also the part in the crisis of loss of path-landscape which has lost its own character of closure as several valleys are merged together.

Keywords

References

  1. 경주사학회(1984) 신라인의 발자취-대왕암에 이르는 길. 경주 사학 3: 165-174
  2. 국립경주문화재연구소(1997) 감은사 발굴조사보고서. 매일 원색정판사
  3. 김부식(1145) 三國史記 李丙薰(譯註). 三國史記 上下. 서울: 乙酉文化社, 1983
  4. 박창범 라대일(1994) 삼국시대 천문현상 기록의 독자 관측 사실 검증, 한국과학사학회지 16(2): 167-202
  5. 선호웅(1986) 동해구 유적의 역사성 관동대학교. 영동문화연구소 영동문화 2: 31-50
  6. 이강래(2004) 삼국사기의 왜 인식-신라사의 경힘을 토대로-. 한국사상사학 22: 1-43
  7. 이희승(1991) 국어대사전. 서울: 민중서림
  8. 장삼식(1989) 한한대사전, 서울: 삼성출판사
  9. 정영호(1992) 석굴 창건과 동해구 신라유적과의 관계. 정신 문화연구 15(3): 53-66
  10. 황수영(1978) 석굴암본존 아미타여래좌상소고-신라동해구 유적과 관련하여-. 미술사학연구 136: 92-95
  11. 황수영(1989) 석굴암. 서울: 예경산업사
  12. 황수영(1993) 신라의 동해구. 서울: 열화당
  13. 황수영(1994) 신라 동해구의 문화유적. 문화사학 2: 39-51