DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Multispectral Remotely Sensed Imagery for the Characterization of Complex Coastal Wetland Ecosystems of southern India: A Special Emphasis on Comparing Soft and Hard Classification Methods

  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

This paper makes an effort to compare the recently evolved soft classification method based on Linear Spectral Mixture Modeling (LSMM) with the traditional hard classification methods based on Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis (ISODATA) and Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithms in order to achieve appropriate results for mapping, monitoring and preserving valuable coastal wetland ecosystems of southern India using Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) 1C/1D LISS-III and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper image data. ISODATA and MLC methods were attempted on these satellite image data to produce maps of 5, 10, 15 and 20 wetland classes for each of three contrast coastal wetland sites, Pitchavaram, Vedaranniyam and Rameswaram. The accuracy of the derived classes was assessed with the simplest descriptive statistic technique called overall accuracy and a discrete multivariate technique called KAPPA accuracy. ISODATA classification resulted in maps with poor accuracy compared to MLC classification that produced maps with improved accuracy. However, there was a systematic decrease in overall accuracy and KAPPA accuracy, when more number of classes was derived from IRS-1C/1D and Landsat-5 TM imagery by ISODATA and MLC. There were two principal factors for the decreased classification accuracy, namely spectral overlapping/confusion and inadequate spatial resolution of the sensors. Compared to the former, the limited instantaneous field of view (IFOV) of these sensors caused occurrence of number of mixture pixels (mixels) in the image and its effect on the classification process was a major problem to deriving accurate wetland cover types, in spite of the increasing spatial resolution of new generation Earth Observation Sensors (EOS). In order to improve the classification accuracy, a soft classification method based on Linear Spectral Mixture Modeling (LSMM) was described to calculate the spectral mixture and classify IRS-1C/1D LISS-III and Landsat-5 TM Imagery. This method considered number of reflectance end-members that form the scene spectra, followed by the determination of their nature and finally the decomposition of the spectra into their endmembers. To evaluate the LSMM areal estimates, resulted fractional end-members were compared with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), ground truth data, as well as those estimates derived from the traditional hard classifier (MLC). The findings revealed that NDVI values and vegetation fractions were positively correlated ($r^2$= 0.96, 0.95 and 0.92 for Rameswaram, Vedaranniyam and Pitchavaram respectively) and NDVI and soil fraction values were negatively correlated ($r^2$ =0.53, 0.39 and 0.13), indicating the reliability of the sub-pixel classification. Comparing with ground truth data, the precision of LSMM for deriving moisture fraction was 92% and 96% for soil fraction. The LSMM in general would seem well suited to locating small wetland habitats which occurred as sub-pixel inclusions, and to representing continuous gradations between different habitat types.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew J., F. John., J. Sara, and B. David, 2000. Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: Precision and accuracy of Spectral Mixture Modeling and the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 73: 87-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00100-0
  2. Asner, G. P., 1998. Biophysical and biogeochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64: 234-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00014-5
  3. Asner P. and B. Lobell, 2000. A biogeophysical approach for automated SWIR unmixing of soils and vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74: 99-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00126-7
  4. Asner, G. P. and K. B. Heidebrecht, 2002. Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(19): 3939-3958 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110115960
  5. Bastin L., 1997. Comparison of fuzzy c-means classification, Linear mixture modelling and MLC probabilities as tool for unmixing coarse pixels. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(17): 3629-3648 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697216847
  6. Bolstad, P. V. and T. M. Lillesand, 1991. Rapid maximum likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57: 67-74
  7. Bowman, R. A., W. D. Guenzi, and D. J. Savory, 1991. Spectroscopic method for estimation of soil organic carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 563-566 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020048x
  8. Carlson, T. N. and D. A. Ripley, 1997. On the relationship between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62: 241-252 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1
  9. Chavez, P. S., 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24: 459-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3
  10. Cochrane, M. A. and C. M. Souza, 1998. Linear mixture model classification of burned forests in the eastern Amazon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19: 3433-3440 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698214109
  11. Congalton, G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37: 35-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
  12. Dicks E. and H. C. Lo, 1990. Evaluation of thematic map accuracy in a land-use and land-cover mapping program. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(9): 1247-1252
  13. Duncan, J., D. Stow., J. Franklin, and A. Hope, 1993. Assessing the relationship between spectral vegetation indices and shrub cover in the Jornada Basin, New Mexico. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14: 3395-3416 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169308904454
  14. Fisher P. F. and S. Pathirana, 1990. The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 34: 121-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(90)90103-S
  15. Foody G. M. and D. P. Cox, 1994. Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a Linear Mixture Modelling and Fuzzy membership functions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(3): 619-631
  16. Franklin, E., 1994. Discrimination of subalphine forest species and canopy density using digital CASI, SPOT PLA and Landsat-TM data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(10): 233-1241
  17. Garcia-Haro F. J., M.A. Gilabert, and J. Mela, 1996. Linear spectral mixture modeling to estimate vegetation amount from optical spectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3373-3400 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949157
  18. Green, E. P., P. J. Mumby., A. J. Edwards, and C. D. Clark, 1996. A review of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources. Coastal Management, 21: 1-40
  19. Hummel, J. W., K. A. Sudduth, and S. E. Hollinger, 2001. Soil moisture and organic matter prediction of surface and subsurface soils using an NIR soil sensor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 32: 149-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(01)00163-6
  20. Jensen J. R., 1996. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective (2nd edition), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  21. Lillesand T. M. and R. W. Kiefer, 1994. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  22. Mas, J. F. and I. Ramirez, 1996. Comparison of land use classification obtained by visual interpretation and digital processing. ITC Journal, 3-4: 278- 283
  23. Martin, L. R. G., 1989. Accuracy assessment of Landsat based visual change detection methods applied to the rural-urban fringe. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55: 209-215
  24. Mather P. M., 1987. Computer processing of remotely sensed images. An introduction. Wiley and Sons, London
  25. McGwire, K., T. Minor, and L. Fenstermaker, 2000. Hyperspectral mixture modeling for quantifying sparse vegetation cover in arid environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 72: 360-374 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00112-1
  26. MSSRF, 1995. Pitchavaram mangroves. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, p.10-11
  27. Pu, R., B. Xu, and P. Gong, 2003. Oakwood crown closure estimation by unmixing Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(22): 4433-4445
  28. Quarmby N. A., J. R. G., Settle, and K. H. White, 1992. Linear mixture modeling of multitemporal AVHRR data for crop area estimation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(3): 415-425 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169208904046
  29. Ramachandran S., S. Sundaramurthy., R. Krishnamoorthy., J. Devasenapathy, and M. Thanikachalam, 1998. Application of remote sensing and GIS to coastal wetland ecology of Tamil Nadu and Andaman and Nicobar group of islands with special reference to mangroves. Current Science, 75(3): 236-244
  30. Ramsey W., A. Nelson., K. Sapkota., C. Laine, and S. Krasznay, 1999. Using multiple-polarization Lband radar to monitor marsh burn recovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(1): 635-639 https://doi.org/10.1109/36.739136
  31. Rainey, M. P., A. N. Tyler., D. J. Gilvear., R. G. Bryant, and P. McDonald, 2003. Mapping intertidal estuarine sediment grain size distributions through airborne remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 480-490 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00126-3
  32. Roberts, D. A., M. O. Smith, and J. B. Adams, 1993. Green vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 44: 255-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90020-X
  33. Roberts D. A., M. Gardner., R. Churn., S. Ustin, and G. Scheer, 1997. Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica mountains using multiple end-member spectral mixture models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 65: 267-279
  34. Selvam, V., 2003. Environmental classification of mangrove wetlands of India. Current Science, 84(6): 757-765
  35. Settle J. J. and N. A. Drake, 1993. Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(6): 1159-1177 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169308904402
  36. Shanmugam, P., 2002. Multisensor image analysis and sub-pixel classification for improved coastal mapping. Ph.D Thesis, Anna University, Chennai, India
  37. Smith, M. G., T. Spencer., A. L. Murray, and J. R. French, 1998. Assessing seasonal vegetation change in coastal wetlands with airborne remote sensing: an outline methodology. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 2: 15-28 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009964705563
  38. Swain P. H. and S. M. Davis, 1978. Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach. McGrau-Hill, New York
  39. Thom, B. G., 1984. Mangrove ecosystem: research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp.3-17
  40. Thomson, A. G., R. M. Fuller., T. H. Sparks., M. G. Yates, and J. Eastwood, 1998. Ground and airborne radiometry over intertidal surfaces: Waveband selection for cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19: 1189-1205 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215685
  41. Ustin, S. L., Q. J. Hart., L. Duan, and G. Scheer, 1996. Vegetation mapping on hardwood rangelands in California. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3015-3036 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949125
  42. Zhu, Z. and D. L. Evans, 1994. U.S. Forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60: 525-531