Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The correlation of bone probing, radiographic and histometric measurements

골탐침과 방사선학적 및 조직학적 계측의 상관관계

  • Hwang, Sung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Lee, Doug-Youn (Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Keun (Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science)
  • 황성준 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 이덕연 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실) ;
  • 이용근 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단)
  • Published : 2003.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The most accurate method to assess bone level is the histometric measurement. However it causes discomfort in patients and damage to the regenerated tissues. in the present study, we used 4 type regenerative therapies, The present study evaluated the clinical reliability and accuracy of bone probing measurements and radiographic bone level in the assessment of bone level by comparing those results with histometric confirmed bone level. Twentyfour(24) intrabony defects(4${\times}$4mm 1-wall intrabony defects) were surgically created in the mandibular second and fourth premolars of 6 beagle dogs. The control group underwent a conventional flap operation. Experimental group I was treated with calcium phosphate glass only, and while experimental group 2 was treated with GTR and experimental group 3 was treated with calcium phosphate glass and GTR. The subjects were sacrificed 8 weeks after the operation and a bone probing measurements, radiographic measurement and histometric measurement was performed. The correlation between bone probing measurements(BP) and histometric measurement(HL), and radiographic measurement(RL) and histometric measurement(HL) were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation analysis and the statistical significance with respect to the type of regenerative therapies was analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis test. The coefficient of correlation to HL was 0.73 for RL and 0.90 for BP. The type of regenerative therapies had no significant effect on the difference between HL and other measurements. The results of this study suggests that bone probing measurements most closely represents actual bone level. So bone probing measurements may be a good clinical method for assessing the hone level following any type of periodontal regenerative therapies.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim HY, Yi SW, Choi SH, Kim CK: Bone probing measurement as a reliable evaluation of the bone level in periodontal defects. J Periodontol 71: 729-735, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.729
  2. Renvert S, Egelberg J: Healing after treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. II. Effect of citric acid conditioning of the root surface. J Clin Periodontol 8: 459-473, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb00895.x
  3. Eickholz P, Benn DK, Staehle HJ: Radiographic evaluation of bone regeneration following periodontal surgery with or without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barriers. J Periodontol 67: 379-385, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.4.379
  4. Greenberg J, Laster L, Listgarten MA: Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level. J Periodontal 47: 514-517, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.9.514
  5. Isidor F: Clinical probing and radiographic assessment in relation to the histologic bone level at oral implants in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 8: 255-264, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080402.x
  6. Mealey BL, Neubauer MF, Butzin CA, Waldrop TC: Use of furcal bone sounding to improve accuracy of furcation diagnosis. J Periodontol 65: 649-657, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.7.649
  7. Suomi JD., Plumbo J, Barbano JP: A comparative study of radiographs and pocket measurements in periodontal disease evaluation. J Periodontol 39: 311-315, 1968 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1968.39.6.311
  8. Ursell MJ: Relationships between alveolar bone levels measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 16: 81-86, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb01618.x
  9. Easley JR: Methods of determining alveolar osseous form. J Periodontol 38: 112-118, 1967 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.2.112
  10. Pistorius A, Patrosio C, Willershausen B, Mildenberger P, Rippen G: Periodontal probing in comparison to diagnosis by CT-scan. Int Dent J 51: 339-347, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2001.tb00847.x
  11. Akesson L, Hakansson J, Rohlin M: Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 19: 326-332, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00654.x
  12. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN.: The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent 28: 219-226, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00062-7
  13. Burnette EW Jr.: Limitations of the roentgenogram in periodontal diagnosis. J Periodontol 42: 293-296, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1971.42.5.293
  14. Duckworth JE, Judy PF, Goodson JM, Socransky SS: A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. J Periodontol 54: 435-440, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.7.435
  15. Hugoson A, Ravald N, Fornell J, Johard G, Teiwik A, Gottlow J: Treatment of class II furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and nonresorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multi-center study. J Periodontol 66: 624-634, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.7.624
  16. Cortellini P, Pini Prato G, Tonetti MS: Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes. A controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 67: 217-223, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.217
  17. Wikesjo UM, Nilveus R: Periodontal repair in dogs. Healing patterns in large circumferential periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 18: 49-59, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01119.x
  18. Haney JM, Nilveus RE, McMillan PJ, Wikesjo UM: Periodontal repair in dogs: expanded polytetra-fluoroethylene barrier membranes support wound stabilization and enhance bone regeneration. J Periodontol 64: 883-890, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.883
  19. Shahmiri S, Singh IJ, Stahl SS.: Clinical response to the use of the HTR polymer implant in human intrabony lesions. lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent 12: 294-299, 1992
  20. Wozney JM: The potential role of bone morphogenetic proteins in periodontal reconstruction. J Periodontol 66: 506-510, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.6.506
  21. Moon IS, Chai JK, Cho KS, Wikesjo UM, Kim CK: Effects of polyglactin mesh combined with resorbable calcium carbonate or replamineform hydroxyapatite on periodontal repair in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 23: 945-951, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00516.x
  22. Barney VC, Levin MP, Adams DF: Bioceramic implants in surgical periodontal defects. A comparison study. J Periodontol 57: 764-770, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1986.57.12.764