DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Load-carrying capacities and failure modes of scaffold-shoring systems, Part II: An analytical model and its closed-form solution

  • Huang, Y.L. (Department of Civil Engineering, Chung-Hsing University) ;
  • Kao, Y.G. (Department of Civil Engineering, Chung-Hsing University) ;
  • Rosowsky, D.V. (Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University)
  • Published : 2000.07.25

Abstract

Critical loads and load-carrying capacities for steel scaffolds used as shoring systems were compared using computational and experimental methods in Part I of this paper. In that paper, a simple 2-D model was established for use in evaluating the structural behavior of scaffold-shoring systems. This 2-D model was derived using an incremental finite element analysis (FEA) of a typical complete scaffold-shoring system. Although the simplified model is only two-dimensional, it predicts the critical loads and failure modes of the complete system. The objective of this paper is to present a closed-form solution to the 2-D model. To simplify the analysis, a simpler model was first established to replace the 2-D model. Then, a closed-form solution for the critical loads and failure modes based on this simplified model were derived using a bifurcation (eigenvalue) approach to the elastic-buckling problem. In this closed-form equation, the critical loads are shown to be function of the number of stories, material properties, and section properties of the scaffolds. The critical loads and failure modes obtained from the analytical (closed-form) solution were compared with the results from the 2-D model. The comparisons show that the critical loads from the analytical solution (simplified model) closely match the results from the more complex model, and that the predicted failure modes are nearly identical.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, W.F and Lui, E.M. (1987), Structural Stability, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., ISBN 0-13-500539- 6.
  2. Huang, Y.L., Cheng, H.J., Rosowsky, D.V. and Kao, Y.G. (2000), "Load-carrying capacities and failure modes of scaffold-shoring systems, Part I: Modeling and experiments", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 10(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.1.053
  3. Jan, T.S. (1987), "General instability of scaffold", Proceedings of International Conference on Structural Failure, Singapore.
  4. Peng, J.L., Pan, A.D., Rosowsky, D.V., Chen, W.F., Yen, T. and Chan, S.L. (1996), "High clearance scaffold systems during construction, II: Structural analysis and development of design guidelines", Engineering Structures, 18(3), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00145-X
  5. Yen, T, Chen, H.J., Huang, Y.L., Chen, W.F., Chi, R.C. and Lin, Y.C. (1997), "Design of scaffold shores for concrete buildings during construction", Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 20(6), 603-614.

Cited by

  1. Scaffold research — A review vol.98, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.016
  2. Effects of geometrical shape and incremental loads on scaffold systems vol.63, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.07.006
  3. Experimental Study of Modular Falsework System with Wooden Shores under Various Path Loads vol.11, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1260/136943308785836844
  4. Structural instability of multi-storey door-type modular steel scaffolds vol.26, pp.7, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.006
  5. Experimental and analytical studies on steel scaffolds under eccentric loads vol.65, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.024
  6. Analysis of scaffolds with connections containing looseness vol.89, pp.21-22, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.03.016
  7. Research on the Time-Varying Interaction of Structure and High Assembled Support System vol.243-249, pp.1662-8985, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.112
  8. Prediction on load carrying capacities of multi-storey door-type modular steel scaffolds vol.4, pp.6, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.6.471