• 제목/요약/키워드: welfare policies

검색결과 898건 처리시간 0.023초

부모역할 지원정책의 개발을 위한 기초연구 (A Pilot Study for Developing Parenting-Aid Policies)

  • 송혜림;박정윤;이완정;성미애;서지원;진미정
    • 대한가정학회지
    • /
    • 제47권6호
    • /
    • pp.91-108
    • /
    • 2009
  • The aim of this study was to assist the development of parenting-aid policies by analyzing information from life perspectives, family system theory, and integrated family policy perspectives. For this purpose, we conducted a literature using a variety of sources including internet sites, laws, published material related to current parenting-aid policies. Based on analyses we formulated four agendas: empowering parent competency, supporting diverse family parenting, guaranteeing parent's rights, and supporting parenting of dual-income families parenting. The results were as follow: Firstly, for empowering parent competency, we proposed the development of family relationship empowerment programs including family life cycle and children-raising support services. Secondly, for diverse family parenting, we proposed access to integrated parenting-aid programs dependent on family types. Thirdly, for guaranteeing parent’s rights, we proposed the supporting of child raising costs and tax returns to families with children, and provide child allowances. Finally, for dual-income family parenting, we proposed that schools and communities must recognize that dual-income families are a universal family type, establish family friendly business culture, and to develop a more democratic domestic family-relationship. This policy proposed a new paradigm where parents must be recognized as partners and stakeholder in development of family related policies. Ultimately, such policies will contribute to increased birth rate and development of a more respectful society.

노르딕 4개국 가족정책의 보편성과 상이성: 아동보육과 돌봄 관련 휴가 정책을 중심으로 (The Differences and Similarity of Family Policies in Nordic Countries: Childcare and Parental leave)

  • 윤홍식
    • 한국사회복지학
    • /
    • 제59권2호
    • /
    • pp.327-354
    • /
    • 2007
  • 본 연구는 1980년부터 2002년까지 노르딕 4개국의 가족정책을 다차원척도분석과 군집분석을 이용해 분석했다. 몇 가지 주목할 만한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 동질적인 특성을 가졌다고 인식되는 노르딕 가족정책이 실제는 서로 다른 특성으로 유형화할 수 있는 상이성을 가지고 있다는 점이다. 특히 주목할 점은 2000년대 들어서 노르딕 4개국 가족정책의 특성은 1990년대와 달리 국가 간 동질성이 더욱 약해진 것으로 보인다. 둘째, 지난 20여 년간 노르딕 4개국 모두는 상대적으로 부모권 지원보다는 노동권 지원을 중심으로 가족정책을 확대하고 있는 것으로 보인다. 셋째, 구체적으로 보면 노르딕 국가들의 정책방향은 지난 20여 년간 다양한 변화를 거친다. 스웨덴과 노르웨이의 경우 노동권 지원 확대가 가족정책의 중심이었다. 반면 핀란드는 90년대 중반까지는 부모권 중심의 가족정책에서 95년 이후 노동권 중심으로 정책방향을 선회한다. 덴마크는 다른 3개국에 비해 부모권과 노동권 지원의 정책균형이 상대적으로 잘 이루어진 것으로 판단된다.

  • PDF

저소득 한부모가정, 사례에 비추어 본 지원방안 연구 : 건강가정지원센터 활용을 중심으로 (A Study on How to Provide Support to Poor Single Families based on Case Studies)

  • 이승미;김선미
    • 가족자원경영과 정책
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.95-112
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics and the limits of, as well as, Propose an improvement of, the government based policies that support poor single families. For this purpose, this study has analyzed the government based supporting policies for poor single families into four different aspects; income support, dwelling support, medical support, and child-caring support. Also, in order to analyze the situation of the poor single family as well as the limits of the government based supporting policies, an in-depth interview has been conducted with 8 personnel (including 7 single parents and 1 social worker). In the final analysis, a total of 5 case studies have been used to identify the characteristics of the government based supporting policies for various poor single families. As a result, it turned out that the economic situation of the poor single families were extremely unfavorable, and the quality of life was extremely low in the aspects of dwelling, nutrition, health child nurturing and education. Therefore, we are proposing the following supporting policies for the improvement of these families' living conditions: increasing income levels, providing job opportunities, securing dwelling places, providing medical support, and implementing child care benefit policies. Furthermore, we are proposing an expansion of the human services provided by the healthy family support center to these poor single families.

  • PDF

우리나라의 보육정책 (Childcare Policies In Korea)

  • 박경자;황옥경;문혁준
    • 한국보육지원학회지
    • /
    • 제9권5호
    • /
    • pp.513-538
    • /
    • 2013
  • 우리나라는 1921년 태화기독교 여성관 탁아프로그램으로 보육이 시작된 이후 1991년 영유아보육법이 제정되는 등 질적인 보육을 제공할 수 있는 정책적 기반이 꾸준히 발전해왔다. 약 90년 정도 된 보육의 역사에서 보육정책을 담당하는 부처는 시대에 따라, 그리고 관련 법의 규정에 따라 보건사회부, 농업진흥청, 내무부, 문교부, 노동부 등 여러 부처로 분산되어 왔으나, 1991년 제정된 영유아보육법에 의해 보건복지부로 일원화되었고 2004년에는 여성가족부로, 2007년에는 다시 보건복지부로 이관되었다. 우리나라의 보육정책은 1991년 제정된 영유아보육법을 기점으로 교육부 관할의 유치원과 보건복지부 관할의 어린이집의 이원체제로 운영되어 왔다. 최근 출산율의 급속한 저하로 인해 출산율 회복을 위한 정책 개발과 보육의 질적 향상을 도모할 수 있는 방안에 대한 필요성에 의해 다양한 보육정책이 시행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라 현재 보육정책의 주요 특징과 앞으로 다가올 시대를 위해 보육정책이 나아가야 할 방향과 과제에 대해 논의하였다.

한·일 대학생의 노인복지 인식, 치매 인식, 치매태도가 치매정책 인식에 미치는 영향 (The Effect of Korean-Japanese College Students' Perception of Welfare, Dementia Perception, and Dementia Attitude on Dementia Policy Perception)

  • 류애란;이국권
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제9권5호
    • /
    • pp.349-355
    • /
    • 2023
  • 본 연구는 한·일 대학생의 노인복지 인식, 치매 인식, 치매태도가 치매정책에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 주요 결과를 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 한·일 대학생의 치매정책 인식 및 태도에 미치는 영향을 분석한 결과 한·일 대학생 노인복지 인식, 치매 태도가 치매정책 인식에 정적(+)인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 결과로 다음과 같은 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 한국과 일본은 저출산 고령사회 속에서 노인을 위한 사회보험제도를 발전시켜 왔으며, 양국의 문화에 맞는 부양방식의 서비스를 개발하여 제도를 시행하고 있다. 한·일 대학생들의 치매정책 인식에 있어 한국의 노인장기요양보험과 일본의 개호보험의 영향으로 대학생들에 노인복지 인식, 치매 태도의 변화를 가져왔다. 하지만 치매인식이 치매정책 인식에 영향을 미치지 못하는 것을 나타나 대학생들의 치매 인식이 부족한 것으로 보여지고 있다. 치매인식은 여러 가지 치매관련 서비스 또는 치매정책 개발에 대한 요구를 증가시킬 수 있지만 치매인식이 낮으면, 치매에 대해 오해하거나 부정적인 인식이 나타날 수 있다. 이는 치매정책인식에도 영향을 미칠 수 있으며, 치매와 관련된 사회적 지원, 예방, 치료 등의 서비스와 정책이 충분히 발전하지 않을 수 있다. 앞으로 이러한 문제점들을 보완하기 위해 대학생에 대한 치매인식 개선과 이해를 돕기위한 정부와 사회 등 다양한 정보의 제공과 의식향상을 통한 인식개선을 높이는 노력이 필요하다.

성 주류화의 관점에서 본 저소득 실업자에 대한 분석과 자활사업 정착을 위한 정책 제안 (An Analysis on the Low- income Unemployed and a Policy Development for the Self-supporting Program on Gender-mainstreaming Perspective)

  • 백선희
    • 한국사회복지학
    • /
    • 제43권
    • /
    • pp.76-105
    • /
    • 2000
  • In the last two decades, the welfare states have undergone the changes of restructuring towards two ways. One is a restructuring of workfare and the other is a restructuring of the gender model of welfare state. In Korea, the workfare is reflecting on the DJ Welfarism 'Productive Welfare', but the gender model has a little effect on the public policies. By the way, It is imported that has the gender perspective in approaching the self-supporting program in the public assistance representing of the DJ Welfarism. Because almost 60% of the beneficiaries of the program are women. The Gender-mainstreaming strategy criticizes for the laws, the public policies, the public programs that considered gender-neutral or gender-blinded, and then complete the equality between women and men through the modification or development of those. The approach of Gender-mainstreaming is very important strategy for not only women who are self-reliance recipient but also successful settlement of self-supporting program. Nowadays that program is not execute yet. Then we hardly have information about recipients and the results that expected from that. At this point of gender-mainstreaming, this report suggest the strategy to development and settlement of the self-supporting program in the basics of analysis for the low-income unemployed and the government policy response to unemployment. For the gender models of the self-supporting program, the most important thing is throwing the male breadwinner model and adoption the dural-earner model (the gender model) about that program. Then we must produce gender-statistics data, develop programs for public work, job replacement, job training, evaluating system, etc. with gender perspective.

  • PDF

다가구매입임대주택과 영구임대주택 거주자의 주거환경 및 지역사회복지서비스 이용 실태 (Housing Environmental Conditions and Usages of Community Welfare Services among Residents in 'Da-Ka-Gu' Rental Housing and Permanent Rental Apartments)

  • 김미희;노세희
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.133-142
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study was to gather baseline data to be used for improving housing environments and developing welfare policies for low-income groups by identifying the similarities and differences in housing environmental conditions and in the usages of community welfare services between the dwellers of Da-Ka-Gu rental housing and those of permanent rental apartment. This multifaceted diagnosis currently being undertaken can be utilized through the lowincome housing planning and welfare policies as the basis for future policy formulation. Self-administered questionnaires and interviews were carried out by 212 dwellers in Da-Ka-Gu rental housing (104) and permanent rental apartments (108) in the city of Gwangju from July to October of 2010. The main findings are as follows: 1. The dwellers living in both Da-Ka-Gu rental housing and permanent rental apartments are satisfied with their housing environment. Specifically, a higher satisfaction with transportation and a lower satisfaction with neighbor's inter-relationships were evident. The dwellers of Da-Ka-Gu rental housing appear to be more satisfied with community spaces and housing management than those of the permanent rental apartments, whereas the latter appear to be less satisfied with the noise of the housing complex than the former. 2. Of the community welfare service programs, a higher usage is shown for meals service, free health screenings, home repair, and after-school learning programs among all residents in the two housing types. In particular, for the residents of Da-Ka-Gu rental housing, the children's education and parent education programs are more popular, whereas for those of the permanent rental apartments, the housekeeping services and health services utilization are highest.

Housing Welfare Policies in Scandinavia: A Comparative Perspective on a Transition Era

  • Jensen, Lotte
    • 토지주택연구
    • /
    • 제4권2호
    • /
    • pp.133-144
    • /
    • 2013
  • It is commonplace to refer to the Nordic countries of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland as a distinctive and homogenous welfare regime. As far as social housing is concerned, however, the institutional heritage of the respective countries significantly frames the ways in which social housing is understood, regulated and subsidized, and, in turn, how housing regimes respond to the general challenges to the national welfare states. The paper presents a historical institutionalist approach to understanding the diversity of regime responses in the modern era characterized by increasing marketization, welfare criticism and internationalization. The aim is to provide outside readers a theoretically guided empirical insight into Scandinavian social housing policy. The paper first lines up the core of the inbuilt argument of historical institutionalism in housing policy. Secondly, it briefly introduces the distinctive ideal typical features of the five housing regimes, which reveals the first internal distinction between the universal policies of Sweden and Denmark selective policies of Iceland and Finland. The Norwegian case constitutes a transitional model from general to selective during the past quarter of a decade. The third section then concentrates on the differences between Denmark, Sweden and Norway in which social housing is, our was originally, embedded in a universal welfare policy targeting the general level of housing quality for the entire population. Differences stand out, however, between finance, ownership, regulation and governance. The historical institutional argument is, that these differences frame the way in which actors operating on the respective policy arenas can and do respond to challenges. Here, in this section we lose Norway, which de facto has come to operate in a residual manner, due to contemporary effects of the long historical heritage of home ownership. The fourth section then discusses the recent challenges of welfare criticism, internationalization and marketization to the universal models in Denmark and Sweden. Here, it is argued that the institutional differences between the Swedish model of municipal ownership and the Danish model of independent cooperative social housing associations provides different sources of resistance to the prospective dismantlement of social housing as we know it. The fifth section presents the recent Danish reform of the governance model of social housing policy in which the housing associations are conceived of as 'dialogue partners' in the local housing policy, expected to create solutions to, rather than produce problems in social housing areas. The reform testifies to the strategic ability of the Danish social housing associations to employ their historically grounded institutional relative independence of the public system.

주부의 취업유무에 따른 출산태도와 돌봄지원정책 요구도 (A study of attitudes toward childbearing and the need to childcare support policies according to employment status)

  • 송혜림
    • 가족자원경영과 정책
    • /
    • 제20권3호
    • /
    • pp.67-93
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study investigated the attitudes toward childbearing and the need for policies supporting childcare according to the mothers' employment status. Data from 6 employed and 6 unemployed housewives with 1 child were collected using in-depth interviews. The main results from the data analysis comprised 4 themes: 1. the ideal and the real about childbearing; 2. changed experiences after bearing the first child; 3. the meaning of parenting; and 4. husband's division of household/caring labor. A difference between employed and unemployed housewives was founded in their attitude toward childbearing. Furthermore, it was verified that the respondents were not satisfied with present policies and services for childbearing and childcare and they required existing policies to be more effective. The implications for related polices are suggested on the basis of these findings.

한국과 프랑스 제 3공화국의 사회정책과 국가 (A Comparative Study on the origin and development of Welfare State in Korea and France)

  • 나병균
    • 사회복지연구
    • /
    • 제44권3호
    • /
    • pp.371-393
    • /
    • 2013
  • 한국과 프랑스 두 나라 사회정책의 기원은 각각 제3공화국(정)에서 비롯된다. 한국의 경우에는 발전주의가, 프랑스의 경우에는 공화주의와 연대주의가 복지국가의 기본 이념이었다. 두 나라 복지국가는 진보적 공화주의자 집단(프랑스)와 권위주의적 성향의 군부권력자와 관료(한국) 등 기득권층에 의해 주도된 보수주의적 개혁이었다는 점이 공통점이다. 정책 결정과정에서 나타난 특징을 비교한다면, 프랑스의 사회보험 입법들은 10년 내지 18년 이라는 오랜 기간에 걸친 의회 논의 끝에 통과된 것인데 비하여 한국의 경우, 이러한 민주적이고 개방적인 논의과정 없이 최고 권력자와 일부 관료들에 의해 일사천리 식으로 결정되어 복지국가에 대한 여론의 형성과 국민 교육의 시간이 없었다. 프랑스 경험과 비교할 때 한국 사회보장과 복지국가 저 발달의 원인은 제 3공화국에서 시작된 발전주의에서 비롯된다고 판단되며, 향후 한국의 복지국가 발달을 위해서는 이를 대체할 새로운 국가 발전 이념이 요구된다.