• Title/Summary/Keyword: visible imager

Search Result 54, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Introduction of GOCI-II Atmospheric Correction Algorithm and Its Initial Validations (GOCI-II 대기보정 알고리즘의 소개 및 초기단계 검증 결과)

  • Ahn, Jae-Hyun;Kim, Kwang-Seok;Lee, Eun-Kyung;Bae, Su-Jung;Lee, Kyeong-Sang;Moon, Jeong-Eon;Han, Tai-Hyun;Park, Young-Je
    • Korean Journal of Remote Sensing
    • /
    • v.37 no.5_2
    • /
    • pp.1259-1268
    • /
    • 2021
  • The 2nd Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI-II) is the successor to the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI), which employs one near-ultraviolet wavelength (380 nm) and eight visible wavelengths(412, 443, 490, 510, 555, 620, 660, 680 nm) and three near-infrared wavelengths(709, 745, 865 nm) to observe the marine environment in Northeast Asia, including the Korean Peninsula. However, the multispectral radiance image observed at satellite altitude includes both the water-leaving radiance and the atmospheric path radiance. Therefore, the atmospheric correction process to estimate the water-leaving radiance without the path radiance is essential for analyzing the ocean environment. This manuscript describes the GOCI-II standard atmospheric correction algorithm and its initial phase validation. The GOCI-II atmospheric correction method is theoretically based on the previous GOCI atmospheric correction, then partially improved for turbid water with the GOCI-II's two additional bands, i.e., 620 and 709 nm. The match-up showed an acceptable result, with the mean absolute percentage errors are fall within 5% in blue bands. It is supposed that part of the deviation over case-II waters arose from a lack of near-infrared vicarious calibration. We expect the GOCI-II atmospheric correction algorithm to be improved and updated regularly to the GOCI-II data processing system through continuous calibration and validation activities.

Cross-Calibration of GOCI-II in Near-Infrared Band with GOCI (GOCI를 이용한 GOCI-II 근적외 밴드 교차보정)

  • Eunkyung Lee;Sujung Bae;Jae-Hyun Ahn;Kyeong-Sang Lee
    • Korean Journal of Remote Sensing
    • /
    • v.39 no.6_2
    • /
    • pp.1553-1563
    • /
    • 2023
  • The Geostationary Ocean Color Imager-II (GOCI-II) is a satellite designed for ocean color observation, covering the Northeast Asian region and the entire disk of the Earth. It commenced operations in 2020, succeeding its predecessor, GOCI, which had been active for the previous decade. In this study, we aimed to enhance the atmospheric correction algorithm, a critical step in producing satellite-based ocean color data, by performing cross-calibration on the GOCI-II near-infrared (NIR) band using the GOCI NIR band. To achieve this, we conducted a cross-calibration study on the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance of the NIR band and derived a vicarious calibration gain for two NIR bands (745 and 865 nm). As a result of applying this gain, the offset of two sensors decreased and the ratio approached 1. It shows that consistency of two sensors was improved. Also, the Rayleigh-corrected reflectance at 745 nm and 865 nm increased by 5.62% and 9.52%, respectively. This alteration had implications for the ratio of Rayleigh-corrected reflectance at these wavelengths, potentially impacting the atmospheric correction results across all spectral bands, particularly during the aerosol reflectance correction process within the atmospheric correction algorithm. Due to the limited overlapping operational period of GOCI and GOCI-II satellites, we only used data from March 2021. Nevertheless, we anticipate further enhancements through ongoing cross-calibration research with other satellites in the future. Additionally, it is essential to apply the vicarious calibration gain derived for the NIR band in this study to perform vicarious calibration for the visible channels and assess its impact on the accuracy of the ocean color products.

Improvement of Non-linear Estimation Equation of Rainfall Intensity over the Korean Peninsula by using the Brightness Temperature of Satellite and Radar Reflectivity Data (기상위성 휘도온도와 기상레이더 반사도 자료를 이용한 한반도 영역의 강우강도 추정 비선형 관계식 개선)

  • Choi, Haklim;Seo, Jong-Jin;Bae, Juyeon;Kim, Sujin;Lee, Kwang-Mog
    • Journal of the Korean earth science society
    • /
    • v.39 no.2
    • /
    • pp.131-138
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to improve the quantitative precipitation estimation method based on satellite brightness temperature. The non-linear equation for rainfall estimation is improved by analysing precipitation cases around the Korean peninsula in summer. Radar reflectivity is adopted the CAPPI 1.5 and CMAX composite fields that provided by the Korea Meteorological Agency (KMA). In addition, the satellite data are used infrared, water vapor and visible channel measured from meteorological imager sensor mounted on the Chollian satellite. The improved algorithm is compared with the results of the A-E method and CRR analytic function. POD, FAR and CSI are 0.67, 0.76 and 0.21, respectively. The MAE and RMSE are 2.49 and 6.18 mm/h. As the quantitative error was reduced in comparison to A-E and qualitative accuracy increased in compare with CRR, the disadvantage of both algorithms are complemented. The method of estimating precipitation through a relational expression can be used for short-term forecasting because of allowing precipitation estimation in a short time without going through complicated algorithms.

Quality Evaluation through Inter-Comparison of Satellite Cloud Detection Products in East Asia (동아시아 지역의 위성 구름탐지 산출물 상호 비교를 통한 품질 평가)

  • Byeon, Yugyeong;Choi, Sungwon;Jin, Donghyun;Seong, Noh-hun;Jung, Daeseong;Sim, Suyoung;Woo, Jongho;Jeon, Uujin;Han, Kyung-soo
    • Korean Journal of Remote Sensing
    • /
    • v.37 no.6_2
    • /
    • pp.1829-1836
    • /
    • 2021
  • Cloud detection means determining the presence or absence of clouds in a pixel in a satellite image, and acts as an important factor affecting the utility and accuracy of the satellite image. In this study, among the satellites of various advanced organizations that provide cloud detection data, we intend to perform quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis on the difference between the cloud detection data of GK-2A/AMI, Terra/MODIS, and Suomi-NPP/VIIRS. As a result of quantitative comparison, the Proportion Correct (PC) index values in January were 74.16% for GK-2A & MODIS, 75.39% for GK-2A & VIIRS, and 87.35% for GK-2A & MODIS in April, and GK-2A & VIIRS showed that 87.71% of clouds were detected in April compared to January without much difference by satellite. As for the qualitative comparison results, when compared with RGB images, it was confirmed that the results corresponding to April rather than January detected clouds better than the previous quantitative results. However, if thin clouds or snow cover exist, each satellite were some differences in the cloud detection results.