• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.161-171
• /
• 2023

The traditional safety management method starts with the misconception that similar accidents will recur if the inappropriate behavior of the person who caused the accident is investigated and punishment is not judged. However, in modern safety management, incidents or situations occur when negative conditions latent in the system are mutually influenced and triggered. The precedent for revoking the disposition of suspension of first officer A of Eastar Jet, which won a legal lawsuit against the administrative regulatory authority, is a representative example that will serve as an opportunity for the administrative regulatory authority to break away from the punishment-oriented safety management method of the past. On the other hand, airmans and air carriers also need to have a clear understanding of flight regulations, and when judicial judgment is required, predictable and effective legal effects can be obtained by preparing clear standards for flight regulations. In addition, administrative regulatory authorities expect a change from the punishment-oriented safety management policy of the past to a systematic safety management policy.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.153-159
• /
• 2019

항해사나 기관사 등 해기사에 의한 선박운항 과정에서 이들의 과실이나 부주의로 인한 해양사고나 위법행위가 발생한다. 그 결과로 해기사 면허에 대한 행정처분이 따른다. 처분 즉, 면허징계는 올바른 법규와 절차에 따라서 형평성 있게 이루어져야 한다. 하지만, 실제는 그렇지 못한 것으로 나타났다. 이에 대한 현황파악을 위하여 B지방해양수산청에서 2014년부터 2018년까지 5년간 이루어진 737명의 해기사 면허 징계처분 내용을 살펴보았다. 분석내용은 징계처분통보기관, 면허종류, 당시 직책, 징계량, 위반행위, 연도별 처분현황, 징계규정과 절차 그리고 경감규정과 감면 정도 등이다. 분석 결과 관련 규정별 징계량 편차, 징계 규정 미비, 면허종류별 징계 대상자 편차, 징계 경감규정 미비 그리고 선원행정처분심의회 역할 부족 등의 문제점이 식별되었다. 마지막에 드러난 문제점들에 대한 개선방안을 제안하였다. 이 연구는 국내에서 처음으로 해기사에 대한 다수의 실제 행정처분 사례를 분석하고 미비점을 확인하여 개선안을 제시한 것으로, 향후 해기사에 대한 연구나 정책수립에 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.396-405
• /
• 2024

This study analyzed the practical issues in the Serious Accident Punishment Act (SAPA) for construction sites and proposed measures to improve provisions that are detached from reality. The Act aims to prevent major accidents across various industries, with a particular emphasis on the construction sector. While the Act's intention is commendable, several significant legal flaws have emerged during its implementation. These issues were critically analyzed and strategic recommendations were proposed. Key issues include ambiguous legal definitions, the differential impact of the law on small and large businesses, and the increased administrative and managerial burdens. This study proposed specific measures to enhance the clarity of legal terminology and technology, balance the responsibilities between small and large businesses, and streamline administrative processes. Additionally, methods for effectively revising the regulations and reasonably complying with them on-site were proposed. By addressing these issues, we aim to improve the effectiveness of the law, ensure fair application, and ultimately create a safer working environment in the construction industry. The recommendations are expected to serve as valuable resources for future revisions and improvements to SAPA and contribute to the broader goal of sustainable industrial safety and development.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.33-40
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to analyze the architect's Administrative Tribunal cases related to housing projects. We collected the 271 decisions of Administrative Tribunal cases from 1985 to 2001 through the Ministry of Legislation data base. As a conclusion of research, most of cases are caused during design process and supervision of construction which are major roles of architects. We can find out that the number of cases of Administrative Tribunal about housing is 10% more than other types of building. And this situation is more serious in supervision building phase. It proves that housing project has more possibility of violation of law than other types. Because it belong to an economic problems. In Korea, clients of housing project tend to take more profits by taking an illegal acts； like enlargement of a building, construction border violation. illegal construction balcony and so on. And architect who roles to be a supervisor is liable to these problems but he has not much authority and economical benefits. Through this research we can analyze this situation and make know what is problem.

• International Journal of Safety
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 2004

Current OSH system was analyzed in this paper to explain why high fatal incidents and disasters are continuously repeated for recent years in Korea. It was found that we have Dichotomous Perceptional Misconception of prevention before accident and compensation after accident and there is a significant lack of proper feed­back reward system for OSH performance. It was assumed that no reduction of accident rate and fatality rate have not been achieved recently despite of a great effort and increased resource allocations. Some statistics for proving weak punishment were analyzed. In the current system, the will of administrative agency would have been very limited particularly in the legal aspects. The Industrial Safety and Health Act is not suitable to after-injury punishment for employer and/or corporate since it is based on a framework for enforcement of prevention. Based on these analyses, it was concluded that there was a need to consider a special law for Corporate Accountability for Fatal Accidents. Because it is necessary to consider seriously for introduction of a new legal system for after injury punishment to repair the current system where it was found lack of proper feedback system. Also, there was no proper sanction measures for corporate with the current OSH legal system, and the most urgent problem in OSH area is the high fatality rate. it is necessary to consider seriously for introduction of a new legal system for after injury punishment. Also, there is no proper sanction measures for corporate with the current OSH legal system, and the most urgent problem in OSH area is the high fatality rate.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.139-179
• /
• 2008

This study was carried out to investigate the present conditions and discuss the issues of the Subrogation payment system in emergency medicine. Hitherto preceding study is focusing on controversial of management or efficient control of Subrogation payment system in emergency medicine. The object of this study is legalistic study of the Subrogation payment system in emergency medicine. The Current legalistic issues of subrogation payment system in emergency medicine are the following aspects; Firstly, there are a claimant conformity to the standard limit. Secondly, the review system is not propriety of the promptitude. Thirdly, there is a lack of propriety claim for compensation of a support responsible person. Fourthly, there are objectivity and fairness of administrative appeal system Fifthly, the point where one starts counting of extinctive prescription. Sixthly, the administrative punishment is an illogical system. Lastly, equity and fairness of the Review Agency, as an insurance company and an review Agency are sameness In conclusion, we ought to improvement an unnecessary obstructions of promptitude in the Subrogation payment system in emergency medicine, and ensure a right of emergency medicine without delay.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.148-155
• /
• 2024

Objectives: Among the regulations that have recently attracted a lot of social attention in Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health Standards, we would like to specifically present the reasons why even companies with strong will to comply with regulations that are not effective or entail a number of legal problems, and suggest ways to improve them. Methods: The facts were confirmed and identified through various methods such as interviews and meetings with labor inspectors who enforce the Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health Standards and safety officials at industrial sites experiencing them. Results: Due to the lack of effectiveness in Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health Standards, there are not a few areas that do not function properly as a preventive standard. Although operating the regulatory nature of punishment as an administrative guideline without basing it on Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health Standards is a direct violation of the principles of the administration of the rule of law, there are many expedient ways to replace what should be placed in this rule as just an administrative guideline. Conclusions: It should be prioritized to explicitly stipulate effective regulations within the Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health Standards. In addition, as regulations on occupational safety and health standards play a large part in preventing industrial accidents, comprehensive and practical measures are indispensable rather than fragmented and formal measures to ensure that these rules function properly in the prevention industrial accidents.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제58호
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2019

최근 우리사회가 현대지식경제사회로 진입하면서 정부의 정책과 규제가 국민 삶에 많은 영향을 미치고 있다. 또한 과거와 달리 환경·주택문제, 도시·교통문제, 노사·노동문제 등 다양한 분야에서 발생되는 문제점과 사회적 현안에 대하여 행정의 개입을 희망하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울특별시 민생사법경찰단 운영 10년을 통하여 지방자치단체가 특사경 전담조직 운영함에 있어 당위성을 제시하고자 한다. 연구방법은 행정작용의 실효성 확보를 위한 방안으로 행정형벌의 집행과정과 그 효과에 대하여 서울시의 통계자료 등을 기초로 하는 문헌연구를 통해 다루었다. 이에 서울시 민생사법경찰단 운영 10년의 조직변천 과정과 운영현황을 분석하고 행정의 집행력 강화를 위해 수사 전담조직인 민생사법경찰단의 직무 확장이 어떻게 이루어지고 있는지 고찰하고자 한다. 또한 국가보훈처와 같이 특별사법경찰 사무가 활용되지 아니하고 있음에도 법령에 존치되고 있는 현행 관련법률의 정비를 유도하고, 향후 자치경찰제 시행에 따른 특별사법경찰 전담조직의 예상되는 변화를 능동적으로 수용할 수 있도록 미래지향적 제언을 하고자 한다.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.51-65
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to identify the problems related to the amendment and preservation of the lien system and to suggest a feasible and efficient improvement plan. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and descriptive statistical analyses were used in this study. The survey subjects were divided into three groups based on their expertise: "Administrative Experts, Practical Experts, and Financial Institution Experts" and compared to find the results. The results show that 1) the procedural aspect was the most important for the large classification, 2) the supplementary disclosure system was the most important for the legislative aspect, and 3) the supplementation of the abuse of the lien report was the most important for the intermediate classification. Furthermore, the study showed that the most important finding was the reinforcement of punishment for the right of false reporting and illegal acts, followed by the registration order system (the creditor alone application), and the registration system (bond, debtor, joint application). The implications and suggestions of this study are as followed. With regard to the current lien system, illegal acts such as false liens and the misuse of multiple reporting were considered as the biggest problems. In terms of the effective improvement plan of the lien system, the misuse of reporting liens and improvement in the procedural aspects of reporting rights should be given top priority. Therefore, the most important course of action is to strengthen the punishment for false liens, improve the disclosure system and make it mandatory to report rights.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.149-179
• /
• 2010

In November 2007, the Korean Constiutional Court held that a joint penal provision in which the individual employer is punished when his or her employee is determined to have committed a crime was unconstitutional, because the joint penal provision had no contents for the culpability of an individual employer and thus violated the constitutionally protected principle of culpability. After the Korean Constitutional Court's judgment, since December 2008 the Ministry of Justice began to change the old joint penal provision into the new revised joint penal provision. On January 2010, the old joint penal provisions of 110 laws were revised. The new revised joint penal provision adds only an additional sentence: "If a juristic person, an entity or an individual perform due care and supervision over its employee for the prevention of such a crime, it will be exempted from the punishment". But an presumption of negligence clause that is added in the new revised joint penal provision is still vacuum in concerned with supervision responsibility. Probably the new form of penal provision, that is understood to be a kind of the presumption of negligence, could let the burden of proof be changed from the public prosecutor to the accused, in other words employer-side. Especially, when joint penal provision is applied to hospital as administrative punishment, according to the hospital is a (juridical) foundation or not, the application of the joint penal provision is different and unfaithful. In my opinion, therefore, a corporation liability could be considered according to various liability of employee's business and the crime its employee committed because of an organizational failure of the corporation.