• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.65-77
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this paper is to develop a model of level evaluation for data governance that can diagnose and verify level of insufficient part of operating data governance. We expanded the previous study related on attribute indices of data governance and developed a level model of evaluation and items. The model of level evaluation for data governance is the level of evaluation and has items of 400 components. We used previous studies and expert opinion analysis such as the Delphi technique, KJ method in this paper. This study contributes to literature by developing a level evaluation model for data governance at the early phase. This paper will be used for the base line data in objective evidence of performance in the companies and agencies of operating data governance.

• 제어로봇시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.112-119
• /
• 2014

A force support system is composed of capital components such as combat equipments, supplies and so on to enable constant fighting power capability. Private technology level evaluation is on the rise as an important spin-on method in force support systems, which requires 92% of total munitions requirements, to obtain superior private technology. The evaluation of the private sector technology level on Korean force support systems has been conducted for the first time as follows: this research chose 38 items to be acquired within 2-3 years and grouped either identical or similar technology among those 38 items. A technology evaluating method was established based on the analysis of domestic and foreign technology level evaluations. Evaluation was performed by a Delphi survey from 180 private and military experts. To obtain an objective index and raise political availability, a technology system map and standard document were developed and applied to all 38 items.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.1911-1919
• /
• 2009

현재의 정보보호시스템 위험 분석 수준 측정에 대한 시험 평가업무는 미국, 영국을 비롯한 선진국에서만 평가 기술을 확보하고 있으나, 국내의 경우 위험분석 수준측정을 위한 인프라와 평가기술이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 정보보안 위험분석 수준 측정 기술 및 평가방법에 대해 연구하고 이를 이용하여 보안통제항목의 개발 및 이를 적용한 보안 수준 성능 평가 도구를 제시한다. 제시한 도구를 이용한 정보보호 시스템의 보안 관리 수준 분석을 통해 현 시스템과 보안 환경에 대한 보안 관리 수준을 평가할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.461-479
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서 국가 대형 R&D가 적용될 신제품의 기술수준 평가에 적용할 수 있는 평가관점과 분석 방법론을 새롭게 제안하였고, 초전도 케이블 기술의 수준평가에 적용하였다 신제품의 기술수준을 평가하기 위해서 요소기술 분류, 평가요인 분석, 평가항목의 구성 및 내용, 기술수준 평가 및 표현 방법 등에 관한 논리적 절차를 제시하였다. 기술 경쟁성을 평가하기 위해서 기술속성 변수를 설정하여 분석하였다. 상대적인 경쟁성을 수치 및 위치로 표현하기 위해서 다변량 기법인 주성분 분석을 적용하였다. 기술성과 권리성평가 결과를 종합한 기술수준 평가에서 초전도 케이블 기술은 글로벌 선도기술 대비 최소 96.11% 최대 101.76% 범위 내에 있을 것으로 추정되었다. 즉, 대상 기술의 기술수준은 '세계 선도기술과 비교하여 대등한 수준에 있다'는 주장을 채택할 만한 충분한 근거가 분석되었다. 제안된 신제품의 기술수준평가 관점 및 논리는 국가 대형 R&D 기술수준을 평가하는데 유용하게 적용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.650-676
• /
• 2005

It is important to identify the mid and long-term strategic technologies and evaluate technology level for the establishment of national R&D policy to upgrade technology level in Korea. This paper summarizes the result of technology level evaluation for 99 key technologies of 'National Technology Road Map', which consists of 5 visions, of Korea. The technology level, the technological gap between Korea and world-top country, the role of government to upgrade technology level, etc. were investigated by the survey (total 1,067 respondents) and the interview with experts related to key technologies. The average technology level of Korea was $65.1\%$ of that of world-top country and average technological gap was 5.8 years. The technology level of vision I 'Building an Information-Knowledge-Intelligence Society' was $71.6\%$ and highest among 5 visions. The highest technology level among 99 key technologies was $85.6\%$ for 'Digital Broadcasting Technology' and the lowest was $20\%$ for 'weather Control Technology'. The major reasons of technological gap were investigated as the lack of R&D personnel ($23.8\%$), the shortage of R&D funds ($17.8\%$), and the insufficiency of basic research ($15.4\%$), in sequence. The average technology level of USA was evaluated to highest in the world. It was presented that the technological power of China increased rapidly in the expert interview. The result of technology level evaluation would be primary information for various national S&T planning, such as S&T basic plan, S&T foresight, technology road map, etc.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.57-70
• /
• 2015

Purpose - Open source software has high utilization in most of the server market. The utilization of open source software is a global trend. Particularly, Internet infrastructure and platform software open source software development has increased rapidly. Since 2003, the Korean government has published open source software promotion policies and a supply promotion policy. The dynamism of the open source software market, the lack of relevant expertise, and the market transformation due to reasons such as changes in the relevant technology occur slowly in relation to adoption. Therefore, this study proposes an assessment model of services provided in an open source software service company. In this study, the service level of open source software companies is classified into an enterprise-level assessment area, the service level assessment area, and service area. The assessment model is developed from an on-site driven evaluation index and proposed evaluation framework; the evaluation procedures and evaluation methods are used to achieve the research objective, involving an impartial evaluation model implemented after pilot testing and validation. Research Design, data, and methodology - This study adopted an iteration development model to accommodate various requirements, and presented and validated the assessment model to address the situation of the open source software service company. Phase 1 - Theoretical background and literature review Phase 2 - Research on an evaluation index based on the open source software service company Phase 3 - Index improvement through expert validation Phase 4 - Finalizing an evaluation model reflecting additional requirements Based on the open source software adoption case study and latest technology trends, we developed an open source software service concept definition and classification of public service activities for open source software service companies. We also presented open source software service company service level measures by developing a service level factor analysis assessment. The Behavior-Structure-Evolution Evaluation Model (BSEM) proposed in this study consisted of a rating methodology for calculating the level that can be granted through the assessment and evaluation of an enterprise-level data model. An open source software service company's service comprises the service area and service domain, while the technology acceptance model comprises the service area, technical domain, technical sub-domain, and open source software name. Finally, the evaluation index comprises the evaluation group, category, and items. Results - Utilization of an open source software service level evaluation model For the development of an open source software service level evaluation model, common service providers need to standardize the quality of the service, so that surveys and expert workshops performed in open source software service companies can establish the evaluation criteria according to their qualitative differences. Conclusion - Based on this evaluation model's systematic evaluation process and monitoring, an open source software service adoption company can acquire reliable information for open source software adoption. Inducing the growth of open source software service companies will facilitate the development of the open source software industry.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.281-307
• /
• 2020

A variety of approaches are being applied to improve the existing ex-ante evaluation by expert panels in publicly funded R&D. While the objective evaluation criteria are constantly being improved to screen and select the superior projects, alternative approaches such as random prioritization and logical modeling are also underway to overcome the conservative bias of reviewers and to secure disruptive innovation. This study intends to find critical implications for ex-ante evaluation of public R&D system from the comparison of Indonesia and Korea. For the comparative analysis, literature review and expert in-depth interviews are conducted on the national R&D system and the selection evaluation process. In Korea, the selection criteria of projects are legally promulgated for establishing an objective evaluation system, and at the program level, the major considerations in the planning process are specified by Presidential Decree. On the other hand, while Indonesia conducts R&D in 47 strategic fields largely by public research institutes (PRI) based on the non-competitive government contributions. This study draws out implications of institutionalizing the planning process at the level of program, and of increasing the ratio of contract-based competitive funding at the level of project in the national R&D portfolio.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.77-94
• /
• 2015

This research aims to develope a maturity evaluation model on the technology management competence (MEMTMC) and to investigate the relationship between technology management competencies and maturity evaluation level in Korean firms. After research framework building through literature review and field study focusing on interview process, a maturity evaluation model was suggested, including technology management competency factors such as vision and strategy, leadership, resources, projects, performance management, and systematic procedures. Through the empirical study on the 111 Korean firms, the MEMTMC model was tested and some hypotheses were examined. As a result of the research, we found that the MEMTMC is significant statistically to evaluate the technology management competencies of firms from a practical point of view. Additionally, these findings suggest that firms can build up their technology management competencies, including the vision and strategy, leadership, resources, projects, performance management, and systematic procedures in order to raise their maturity level of technology management competencies. But this research has some limitations such as this MEMTMC has not considered separately the variety of industry, not enough survey respondents and 5 level group firms etc.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.351-358
• /
• 2022

건설업의 사망만인률은 더이상 줄어들지 않고 답보상태에 있으며 이를 개선하기 위한 발주, 설계, 시공, 건설사업관리 등 다양한 건설참여자 주체의 노력이 있다. 정부에서는 타 산업 대비 높은 건설업의 중대재해를 줄이기 위해 건설참여자들의 안전수준을 평가하고 이를 공표하여 경각심을 갖도록 하고 있다. 그러나 안전관리 수준평가의 항목, 기준, 절차에 있어서 현장 상황에 맞지 않는 점들이 나타나고 있어 이들의 개선이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 안전관리에 가장 열악한 상황에 있는 건설기술용역사업자에 대한 안전관리 수준평가의 개선을 위해 기존 안전관리 수준평가 결과분석, 평가자 및 피평가자 심층인터뷰(FGI)를 시행하였으며 이를 근거로 평가의 개선방향을 도출하였다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.96-101
• /
• 2009

In this study, a risk-appearance frequency evaluation model for railway level-crossing accidents is developed with the frequency estimation based on the accident history. It follows the worldwide common safety management approach and reflects the operation conditions and accident properties of the domestic railway system. The risk appearance frequency evaluation process contains a development of accident scenarios by defining the system configurations and functions, and a frequency estimation of hazardous events based on the accident history. The developed model is verified with the accident history during 5 years('03-'07) for 3 hazardous events: 'Being trapped in level crossing(Hl)', 'Crossing during warning signal(H2)' and 'Breaking through/detouring the barrier(H3)'. This risk appearance frequency evaluation model will be combined with a consequence evaluation model so as to offer full risk assessment for the railway accident. The accident risk assessment will contribute to improving the safety management of the railway system.