• Architectural research
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 2018

In order to compare the development performance of headed reinforcing bar and straight reinforcing bar in tension for steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC), pullout test of specimens with reinforcing bar which was anchored on simple beam perpendicularly was conducted. The experimental variables were steel fiber volume ratio ($V_{Rsf}$), concrete compressive strength, and existence of head. As the result of test, splitting failure of concrete in the development direction of reinforcing bar in most specimens was observed. For development detail of headed reinforcing deformation bar, specimens with 1% $V_{Rsf}$ showed approximately 63%~119% increase in pullout strength compare to specimens with 0% $V_{Rsf}$. Test result shows that SFRC is more effective in increasing pullout strength for headed reinforcing bars than increasing pullout strength of straight bars.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제92권4호
• /
• pp.405-419
• /
• 2024

In severe intensity seismic zones, the conventional detailing of reinforcement in the exterior beam-to-column joint causes congestion of steel that affects the ease of construction. This article evaluates the behaviour of exterior beam-column joints with different anchorage/connection methods suitable for avoiding steel congestion. Sub-assemblages having six-joint connections were cast and tested under reverse cyclic loading at the tip of the beam under displacement control. Of these, four connections are non-conventional reinforcement detailing were detailed as per ACI 352R-02 and IS-456 along with confinement as per IS-13920, Straight-Headed Bar, X Cross-Headed Bar and the remaining specimens are detailed as a conventional confined specimen. The experimental results from the specimens with different anchorages are compared with the monolithic connection. The study revealed that the X cross-headed bar considerably enhanced the joint's seismic performance in terms of strength, ductility, and energy dissipation. A numerical model (ABAQUS) that considers the nonlinear behaviour of steel and concrete in the beam-column joint is also considered in this study. The results of the experimental tests and the numerical differed by less than 10% on average. The developed headed-bar connection at the beam-column joint is evaluated by calculating the possible shear stress in the joints theoretically and the estimated values lie well within the values specified in standards/codes.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2004년도 춘계 학술발표회 제16권1호
• /
• pp.506-509
• /
• 2004

This paper proposes Headed bar as reinforcement of beam-column joint, and proves seismic performance and reduction of reinforcement congestion. In these case, the use of Headed bars have obvious advantages. The greatest benefit of using Headed bars is not only improved structural performance of beam-column joints, but also the ease of fabrication, construction, and placement. Three-dimensional finite element analysis model is compared with test program which was fulfilled by the proposed model with Headed bar. Also, the plastic hinge region is relocated to the center of the longitudinal beam length according to the strong column-weak beam design philosophy, so Headed bar is used as the joint reinforcement. Therefore, this paper presents results of a computer analysis of a practical solution for relocating potential beam plastic hinge regions by the placing of straight - Headed bar.

• 도시과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.21-27
• /
• 2018

With the increase of the skyscraper center, the development of large-diameter and high-strength reinforcing bars is being carried out to solve the dense reinforcement. In case of the steel reinforced concrete with a small cross section such as beam-column joints, the development length becomes short when straight bars are used. Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem that the development length becomes short by using the bearing strength of the hooked bar and headed bar. In this study, the exterior beam-column joint test of SD700 hooked bar and headed bar with anchorage length of 20db was conducted to extend the development length limitation of hooked bar and headed bar. As a result of the evaluation of the anchorage strength using the design equation by KCI, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.31 for the hooked reinforcing bars. In the case of headed bars, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.12. In addition, in order to compare the anchorage performance of the hooked bar and the headed bar, the measured values were divided by the square root of the compressive strength of the concrete to compare the anchorage strength. Under the same conditions, the anchorage strength of headed bars was 8.5% higher than the hooked bars.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.262-269
• /
• 2021

본 논문은 SD700 확대머리철근의 겹침이음을 이용한 단차가 있는 보의 접합상세를 개발하기 위하여 실시한 구조성능평가 실험결과를 나타낸다. 실험변수는 주철근의 겹침이음길이, 철근 항복강도, 단부정착상세 등이다. 모든 실험체에 대하여 춤이 작은 보(B2)의 하부 주철근은 확대머리철근을 적용하였으며, 춤이 큰 보(B1)의 하부 주철근은 일자형 확대머리철근, 90° 갈고리형 확대머리철근 등 두 가지 상세로 이음방법을 적용하였다. 실험결과, SD500과 SD600을 적용한 실험체들은 겹침이음부에서 모두 휨파괴되었으며, 이로 인하여 최대내력은 유사하게 나타났다. SD500을 적용한 실험체들에 대하여, B1의 주철근을 90°갈고리형 확대머리철근으로 적용한 상세가 확대머리철근에 비하여 겹침이음부의 수평균열을 억제하였다. SD700의 확대머리철근을 사용한 실험체는 취성적인 정착파괴가 나타났으며, 겹침이음길이의 증가에 따라 최대내력이 증가하였다. SD700의 확대머리철근을 사용한 실험체들은 실험체정착길이/이론정착길이에 대한 실험내력/이론내력이 ACI 318-19 식은 1.30~1.48로 나타났으며, KDS-2021 식은 1.14~1.30로 평가되었다. 이를 볼 때, ACI 318-19 산정식이 보다 보수적으로 정착길이를 평가함으로써 더 큰 안전율을 가지고 있었다.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제84권4호
• /
• pp.531-546
• /
• 2022

Headed bars are often used when there is insufficient space for a straight or curved bar to be fully developed to ensure the transference of forces between steel and concrete in several types of connections between structural members. In such cases, the concrete breakout strength of the headed bars can be a critical point of the design and must be considered appropriately. This paper evaluates the tensile strength of headed bars embedded in reinforced concrete members, failing due to concrete breakout. Four experimental tests on headed bars embedded in slender concrete members are presented and discussed, showing that strength previsions from the design codes can be significantly conservative as they ignore the contribution from the flexural reinforcement. 3D finite element models were developed using Abaqus Unified FEA to simulate the tested specimens, and it was observed that they were able to reproduce the formation of the concrete cone accurately, besides the response and resistance observed in tests. Furthermore, the experimental, numerical, and design code resistances are compared and discussed. A new equation to evaluate the concrete cone strength of the tested headed bars is proposed, which takes into account parameters not explicitly considered in the current design equations.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.111-117
• /
• 2019

확대머리 SD600 고강도 인장철근으로 단부 정착된 SFRC 깊은보의 전단성능을 평가하기 위해 전단 실험을 수행하였다. 실험 변수는 주인장 철근의 단부 정착방법(확대머리 철근, 일자형 철근), 단부 정착길이, 전단보강근 유무 등이다. 전단경간비는 1을 가지는 실험체에 대한 전단실험결과, 모든 실험체는 초기 휨 균열이 발생한 후 경사균열이 진행되면서 최종적으로 압축전단파괴되었다. 확대머리 철근으로 기계적 정착된 실험체들이 일자형 철근 정착에 비하여 5.6~22.4% 더 큰 전단강도를 나타내었다. 확대머리 철근으로 기계적 정착된 실험체들에 대하여 최대하중의 75%까지는 지압응력이 전체 정착응력의 0.9~17.2%에 도달하였으나, 최대하중 시점에서 지압응력이 전체 정착응력의 22.4%~46%에 도달하여 큰 응력 부담률을 나타내었다. 이를 통하여 확대머리 지압응력에 의한 정착응력 증가가 전단강도에 큰 영향을 미침을 알 수 있다. 실험 전단강도가 실용식에 의한 전단강도의 2.68~4.65 배로 평가되어, 실용식이 전단내력을 안전측으로 평가하였다.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2014

현행 콘크리트구조기준 (KCI2012) 및 ACI318-11에서 B급이음된 일자형 이형철근에 대하여 인장력에 대한 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정하고 있다. 동일 기준에서 확대머리 이형철근의 정착길이를 제시하고 있지만 겹침이음상세에 대한 규정은 없다. 이에 본 연구에서는 400MPa과 500MPa 설계기준항복강도를 가지는 확대머리 이형철근의 겹침이음실험을 실시함으로써, 기준의 정착길이식을 겹침이음설계에 적용가능한 지를 평가하고자 하였다. 실험결과, SD400과 SD500의 설계기준항복강도를 적용한 확대머리 이형철근에 대하여 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정할 경우, 실험 최대휨강도가 공칭휨강도에 비하여 16~31% 크게 평가되었고 연성적인 휨파괴 거동을 나타내었다. 따라서, 이들 철근에 대해 정착길이 1.3배의 겹침이음길이로 설계함으로써 강도 및 변형성능 측면에서 겹침이음 성능을 확보할 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.