• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.271-292
• /
• 1994

The comparison of statistical experiments with a common parameter and parameter space is discussed using the concept of the Blackwell's sufficiency and the Shannon's entropy. Binomial and censored experiments are considered as applications. The loss of information is studied under teh aggregated experiments and truncated experiments, and summerized in some tables which make it possible to indicate the choice of an appropriate experiment.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.377-388
• /
• 2007

As one of multi-class classification methods, ECOC (Error Correcting Output Coding) method is known to have low classification error rate. This paper aims at suggesting effective multi-class classification method (1) by comparing various encoding methods and decoding methods in ECOC method and (2) by comparing ECOC method and direct classification method. Both SVM (Support Vector Machine) and logistic regression model were used as binary classifiers in comparison.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.229-236
• /
• 2004

This article presents a multiple comparison ranking procedure for several products of the Poisson rates. A preference probability matrix that warrants the optimal comparison ranking is introduced. Using a Bayesian Monte Carlo method, we develop simulation-based procedure to estimate the matrix and obtain the optimal ranking via a row-sum scores method. Necessary theory and two illustrative examples are provided.

• Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
• /
• v.65 no.1
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2023

Various techniques for bias correction and statistical downscaling have been developed to overcome the limitations related to the spatial and temporal resolution and error of climate change scenario data required in various applied research fields including agriculture and water resources. In this study, the characteristics of three different statistical dowscaling methods (i.e., SQM, SDQDM, and BCSA) provided by AIMS were summarized, and climate change scenarios produced by applying each method were comparatively evaluated. In order to compare the average rainfall characteristics of the past period, an index representing the average rainfall characteristics was used, and the reproducibility of extreme weather conditions was evaluated through the abnormal climate-related index. The reproducibility comparison of spatial distribution and variability was compared through variogram and pattern identification of spatial distribution using the average value of the index of the past period. For temporal reproducibility comparison, the raw data and each detailing technique were compared using the transition probability. The results of the study are presented by quantitatively evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Through comparison of statistical techniques, we expect that the strengths and weaknesses of each detailing technique can be represented, and the most appropriate statistical detailing technique can be advised for the relevant research.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.85-90
• /
• 2003

In this paper we develop a method for finding optimal ordering of K statistical models. This is based on a dependent paired comparison experimental arrangement whose results can naturally be represented by a completely oriented graph (also so called tournament graph). Introducing preference probabilities, strong transitivity conditions, and an optimal criterion to the graph, we show that a Hamiltonian path obtained from row sum ranking is the optimal ordering. Necessary theories involved in the method and computation are provided. As an application of the method, generalized variances of K multivariate normal populations are compared by a Bayesian approach.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.231-240
• /
• 2006

It is well understood that a paired comparison (paired t test) provides better precision than a group comparison (two-sample t test), when the pairing is effective (the variation within a pair is small). However, when the variation among the pairs is sufficiently small, the group comparison is likely to yield a better result. To get a statistical explanation of this, we examine the two methods through an analogy to one-way and two-way analysis of variance. We introduce a new measure, R statistic, which is the ratio of their confidence interval lengths, as a quantitative criterion for comparing the two methods. The distribution of the Rf statistic is described by t and F distribution functions. Through this characterization, we show that the paired comparison can be better than group comparison when the variation among the pairs is statistically significantly large.

• Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.87-91
• /
• 2008

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was investigate statistical validities of previously reported articles that used various statistical techniques such as t-test and analysis of variance. Methods: To analyze the statistical procedures, 66 original articles using those statistical methods were selected from "Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine(KJOM)" published from 1995 to 2007. Results: Twenty-one articles(32%) did not report correct p-values, 33 articles(50%) used mean${\pm}$standard error(mean${\pm}$SE) and 11 articles(l7%) used mean${\pm}$standard deviation(mean${\pm}$SD). Fifty-two articles(95%) of 55 ones which were tested for normal distribution made an error in describing normal distribution. Seventeen articles misused t-test and 12 articles did not carry out the multiple comparison. Conclusions: The training of researchers with clinical statistics or the participation of statisticians in research design will reduce the significant errors in statistical interpretation of the results.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2000

Nonlinear time series prediction is derived and compared between statistic of modeling and neural network method. In particular mean squared errors of predication are obtained in generalized random coefficient model and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model and compared with them by neural network forecasting.

• Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.105-130
• /
• 2010

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to assess the statistical methods errors used in the journal of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine(JORM) and to identify the types of errors in statistical analysis. Methods : We reviewed quantitative articles that were published in the JORM from January 2005 through October 2009. Those were not used by statistical analysis such as literature studies, case study, review articles were not included in this analysis. A total of 296 articles was reviewed. We evaluated the adequacy and the validity of the statistical techniques with our checklist established be modified Lee's checklist, and three statistical evaluators assessed together to minimize bias. Results : Of the 222 articles, 213 were used in inferential and descriptive statistics. Of those 80% of articles adopting descriptive and inferential statistics were detected having statistical errors. One articles used 1.7 statistical method unit generally. Most frequently employed statistics were student t-test, one way ANOVA. pearson correlation analysis, Mann-whitney U test, paired t-test, and chi-square test in their order. However, most frequent statistics having errors were similar in order. The most common statistic errors were as follow: 1. absence of normality test, 2. misuse between paired test and unpaired test, 3. wrong choice of repeated measures analysis without consideration of time variables, 4, increase of Type I error by using inappropriate multiple test, 5. inappropriate application of discrete or categorical data instead of continuous data in correlation analysis, 6. poor consideration of basic consumption in chi-square test, 7. confusion between frequency comparison and average comparison, 8. mentioning the statistical technique without using it. Conclusions : We found various mistake or misuses in the applications of statistical methodologies in the articles published in the JORM. Careful consideration of statistical use and review from the specialist of statistics are warranted for improving the quality of JORM.

• Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2012

Objectives: This study was performed to review the use of statistical analysis methods for the Traditional Korean Medicine studies listed on the Korea Citation Index from 1999 to 2008. Methods: A total of 4217 studies published on four journals of Traditional Korean Medicine were screened and 2682 articles using statistical methods were selected for the review. The selected studies were analysed according to their published year, statistical method and statistical package for use. Results: Statistical methods were used steadily in 64.6% of the articles after 2001, the most used statistical methods(57%) were mean difference comparison between 2 groups. The number of statistical methods mostly used in one article was identified as one in 1931 articles (72.0%). Duncan (36.8%) and Tukey (26.5%) were used for the ANOVA post hoc analysis. SPSS was most frequently used 68% out of Statistical package programs.(the number of mean difference comparison among more than 3 groups was continuously increasing and that makes post hoc being used. skills of statistical methods need to be diversified.) Conclusion: The interest on the proper use of statistical analysis in the research is increasing. This study will contribute to the Evidence-based Teaching on research methodology in Traditional Korean Medicine.