• 농촌의학ㆍ지역보건
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.34-45
• /
• 1992

In this county, the gap between the urban 'haves' and the rural 'have-nots' continues to be an increasing problem. WHO and UNICEF see primary health care(PHC) as the key to achieving an acceptable level of health throughout the world as a community development. PHC is essential health care made accessible to individuals and families in the community by means acceptable to them. It is the first level of contact of individual, the family, and community with the national health system. It includes at least education on health system. It includes at least education on health problems, promotion of food supply, MCH including family planning, immunization against infectious diseases, control of endemic diseases, treatment of common diseases and injuries, promotion of mental health, and provision of essential drugs. However, of the aboves, education concerning of mental health problems and the methods to identify, prevent, and control them is the principal step of establishment. In Korea, the category of PHC worker includes the physician as public doctor and nurse as primary health care practitioner and community health leader as village health worker. PHC workers of the aboves will thus function best if they are appropriately trained to respond to the health needs of the community. However in this country, since the national PHC service project launched in 1980, the government has not developed and performed appropriate and enough education and training activities. In light of above reasons, several categories of health education activities had been planned and performed being aimed at above specific target groups and the main focus was on the village health workers for about one year from July 1991 to July 1992 in Yeoju Kun of Kyonki Province. At the end of the period, evaluation of education input was carried out to measure the improvement of healthful life of people in terms of awareness, attitude, and practice. At the end of the period, evaluation of education input was carried out to measure the improvement of healthful life of people in terms of awareness, attitude, and practice. The totals of 80 village health workers, 13 public health practitioners and 9 public docters took in the course of health education for a few hours at every month and the evaluation works of educational effect were taken. The results the study were as follows. 1) Number of persons who realized the maxim "health care of the people is a duty of the government" increased after the education course, On the other hand, the rate of satisfaction on the effort of government for health promotion of the people decreased. 2) Public doctors and primary health care practitioners(nurses) liked and enjoyed the education schedule as a meeting of peer group. It provided chances of communication with staffs of Korea University Hospital. It was said that lectures covered great deal of knowledge and technic they urgently needed in the field. 3) After finishing the education course, more of village health workers(VHW) thought they adapted themselves to their roles and functions showing increased number of home visit and contact with primary health care practitioners by month. 4) In case of patient refer, VHW preferred primary health care practitioners to public doctors. 5) Capability of VHWs in most of their functions increased dramatically after when the education course finished except tuberculosis control.

• 한국HCI학회논문지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2018

현대인들은 인터넷을 통해 구매하고 싶은 재화와 서비스에 대한 정보를 검색한 후, 그 재화와 서비스를 경험해 본 사람들이 기술한 댓글을 확인한다. 이 댓글은 현대인들의 구매의사결정에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 중요한 참조점으로 작용한다. 댓글은 크게 두 가지 유형으로 구분할 수 있는데, 하나는 댓글이 재화나 서비스에 지불한 가격에 부합하는 (혹은 그 이상의) 만족감을 경험했는지(긍정), 아닌지(부정)와 같은 시장규범적 관점의 댓글이고, 다른 하나는 재화와 서비스 공급자가 그것을 공급하여 수익을 얻을 도덕적 자격이 있는지(긍정), 아닌지(부정)와 같은 비시장규범적 댓글이다. 그러나 댓글에 대한 기존 연구는 시장 규범적 관점의 댓글(음식이 맛있는지)에만 관심을 가졌고, 비시장규범적 댓글(경영자가 도덕적으로 훌륭한지)의 효과에 대한 연구는 거의 이루어지지 않았다. 본 연구는 선행 연구들이 확인한 시장규범적 댓글의 효과를 맛집 방문의도 평가 상황에서 재검증(실험-1)한 후, 기존에 연구가 이루어지지 않았던 비시장 규범적 댓글의 효과를 검증(실험-2)하며, 시장규범적 댓글과 비시장규범적 댓글의 효과를 비교(메타분석)하려는 목적으로 이루어졌다. 결과적으로 시장규범적 댓글이 긍정적일 때(맛있다)가 부정적일 때(맛없다)보다 맛집 방문의도가 강해졌다(실험-1). 또한 비시장규범적 댓글이 긍정적일 때(운영자가 도덕적임)가 부정적 일 때(운영자가 부도덕함)보다 맛집 방문의도가 강해졌다(실험-2). 한편 시장규범적 댓글이 긍정적일 때보다 비시장규범적 댓글이 긍정적일 때 맛집 방문의도가 더 강해졌고, 시장규범적 댓글이 부정적일 때보다 비시장규범적 댓글이 부정적일 때 맛집 방문의도가 더 약해지는 상호작용을 확인하였다. 이는 사람들이 시장규범적 댓글보다 비시장규범적 댓글에 더 큰 영향을 받을 가능성을 시사한다. 아울러 본 연구는 시장규범 댓글을 확인하기 전과 후의 기분변화보다 비시장규범적 댓글을 확인하기 전과 후의 기분변화가 더 크며, 이 차이로 인해 사람들이 시장규범적 댓글보다 비시장규범적 댓글에 더 큰 영향을 받을 수 있다고 제안하였다.