• Journal for History of Mathematics
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.17-28
• /
• 1998

The problem of mathematical rigor is that of giving an objective definition of a rigorous proof. But standards of rigor have changed in mathematics and the notion of proof is not absolute. There are different versions of proof or rigor, depending on time, place, and other things. In this paper we will briefly trace that evolution.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.44 no.4 s.111
• /
• pp.535-546
• /
• 2005

We study on intuitive verification and rigor proof which are in geometry of Korean and Russian $7\~8$ grade's mathematics textbooks. We compare contents of mathematics textbooks of Korea and Russia laying stress on geometry. We extract 4 proposition explained in Korean mathematics textbooks by intuitive verification, analyze these verification method, and compare these with rigor proof in Russian mathematics textbooks.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.385-402
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to conceptualize 'proof' school mathematics. We based on the assumption the following. (a) There are several different roles of 'proof' : verification, explanation, systematization, discovery, communication (b) Accepted criteria for the validity and rigor of a mathematical 'proof' is decided by negotiation of school mathematics community. (c) There are dynamic relations between mathematical proof and empirical theory. We need to rethink the nature of mathematical proof and give appropriate consideration to the different types of proof related to the cognitive development of the notion of proof. 'proof' in school mathematics should be conceptualized in the broader, psychological sense of justification rather than in the narrow sense of deductive, formal proof 'proof' has not been taught in elementary mathematics, traditionally, Most students have had little exposure to the ideas of proof before the geometry. However, 'proof' cannot simply be taught in a single unit. Rather, proof must be a consistent part of students' mathematical experience in all grades, in all mathematics.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.459-481
• /
• 2015

In this study, we investigated whether the theorem is established even if we replace a 'square' element in the Euclidean proof of the Pythagorean theorem with different figures. At this time, we used different figures as equilateral, isosceles triangle, (mutant) a right triangle, a rectangle, a parallelogram, and any similar figures. Pythagorean theorem implies a relationship between the three sides of a right triangle. However, the procedure of Euclidean proof is discussed in relation between the areas of the square, which each edge is the length of each side of a right triangle. In this study, according to the attached figures, we found that the Pythagorean theorem appears in the following three cases, that is, the relationship between the sides, the relationship between the areas, and one case that do not appear in the previous two cases directly. In addition, we recognized the efficiency of Euclidean proof attached the square. This proving activity requires a mathematical process, and a generalization of this process is a good material that can experience the diversity and rigor at the same time.