• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.51-69
• /
• 2008

The financial industry in which arbitration is most frequently resorted to so as to resolve disputes is the sector related to the securities industry. Most securities related disputes are raised from broker-dealer controversies which is not new in the Republic of Korea. The disputes between securities brokers and customers are very frequently settled by arbitration in the United States. But the arbitration in the securities area may deprive investors from securities regulation's protection. Introducing the United States' Federal Supreme Courts cases, the author explores the logic of how the pre-dispute arbitration agreement compatible with Securities regulations. However, the author insist the South Korea should more careful in accepting pre-dispute arbitration contract in securities area. Mostly because of the lack of more specific way to secure substantive fairness in securities arbitration. Also the author worries about the possibility of prevailing pre-dispute arbitration agreement in all of the securities investment contract without any other choices, or securities laws' protection. But the author also suggests to introduce public securities arbitration system of the States, and also insists the way to secure substantive fairness, or the application of securities regulations in securities arbitrations. Which may be the pre-requirements for the pre-dispute arbitration agreement in securities investment contract.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.107-133
• /
• 2004

In these days, arbitration helps alleviate some of the burden of a heavy caseload from the judiciary and is a viable method to resolve disputes in a relatively quick and efficient manner. An award of punitive damages is often the most significant and detrimental part of an award arising from a judicial or arbitral proceeding. In 1995, the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split. upholding an arbitral panel's authority to award punitive damages under a securities arbitration agreement. This decision was monumental in establishing arbitral power. However, it left several questions unanswered. For example, which, if any, standards should be applied to such awards？ The decision in Sawtelle, adopting a separate ground for review of punitive damages awards, is one that signals a significant change in the field of arbitration. This article addresses the reviewability of punitive damages awards arising out of a securities arbitration hearing. It would be necessary to introduce securities arbitration system to our disputes resolution system. Compared to American practices, there could be many differences in recognition on arbitration and legal structure in our country. Thus it will be a future assignment to consider seriously and carefully what kind of securities arbitration system will be proper for us. This article analyzed predispute arbitration agreements and agreements to arbitrate after a dispute has already arisen.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.483-493
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 보험감독규정과 보험회계준칙의 분리계정(구분계리 포함) 관련 규정을 개선하기 위한 대안을 제시하기 위해 수행되었다. 구분계리, 포괄적으로는 분리계정은 회계의 투명성을 증가시키고 보험회사의 주주와 보험계약자 사이의 이익 배분의 공정성을 높이는데 기여할 수 있다. 구분계리의 유용성을 높이기 위해서는 국제회계기준의 변화된 내용, 보험상품별 성과 구분, 보험상품별 경제적 실질이 반영될 수 있어야 한다. 분리계정이 성공적으로 정착된다면 보험계약자에 대한 공정한 이익배분 뿐만 아니라 생명보험회사 상장시의 보험계약자 이익 보호와 관련된 논쟁의 해결에도 기여할 것이다.