• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.245-267
• /
• 2012

이 논문은 공익명분에 입각한 공용수용 방식을 통해서 시행하는 미국 도시재생사업에서 사유재산권의 차별화를 분석한다. 도시재생사업이 강력한 수용방식을 활용하는 사업임에도 불구하고 실제로는 사회적 약자로부터 대자본 또는 민간개발업자에게 재산권을 이전시키는 재산권 차별화와 희생과정임을 밝힌다. 먼저 도시재생에 대해 다양한 학문적 관점에서 연구동향을 검토하고, 새로운 연구방향으로서 법제지리학적 관점을 제시한다. 다음으로 환경보호청과 회계검사원 자료를 통해 미국에서 이들 사업대상 지구의 규모를 추정하며, 이들을 탈공업화와 교외화의 유산으로 파악한다. 다음으로 사유재산권의 차별화 과정은 미국 연방대법원의 공적소유개념에서 경제적 공익개념으로의 공익개념 확장 과정, 공용수용의 민영화 과정, 개발주의 성장연합체제와 대자본 편향 및 인종 계층적 편견, 신자유주의적 재산권운동 등이 복합적으로 작용하여 발생하는 결과라는 것을 밝힌다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.27-46
• /
• 2011

In the intellectual based society of the 21th century, intellectual property of nation and enterprise management has been the key element of nation's competitiveness and development. Therefore in countries like Korea, China, and many other countries, intellectual property of advancement strategy are being constructed and intellectual properties are protected at national level. Top priority task of protecting the intellectual property is to efficiently resolute intellectual property right disputes. Considering the nature of intellectual property right and arbitrage system, arbitration to solve intellectual property disputes is realistically the best method. However, not all cases of them are qualified. In order to relieve the intellectual property disputes through arbitration, qualification must be obtained. During the process, generally and globally, intellectual property right dispute is evaluated by three parts, intellectual property right contract dispute, intellectual property right violation dispute, and intellectual property right validity dispute. Based on UN's "Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Agreement" in 1958, June 10th, in New York, both arbitrage organization and judgment can be approved in both Korea and China countries. However, as of today, there is a big gap of arbitration qualification between two countries, which can be troublesome if intellectual property right disputes arise. For instance, in Korea, intellectual property right contract disputes and intellectual property right violation disputes are both generally accepted as arbitration qualification. However for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is only accepted for non-registered intellectual property as in copyright entity. It does not apply to other registered intellectual property right as in patents. In China, arbitration qualification is accepted for intellectual property right contract dispute, and also accepted for intellectual property right violation dispute to copyrights but restricted to others. As for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is completely denied. Therefore, when there is an intellectual property right dispute between Korea and China, the biggest problem is whether China will accept arbitrage judgments made in Korea. Theoretically, arbitrage judgement made in Korea should be also accepted in China's court. However, considering the criticism of China's passive nature of arbitration qualification for its own local intellectual property right disputes, it's very unlikely they'll actively accept arbitrary judgment made in foreign countries. Korea and China must have a more open minded approach for intellectual property disputes and arbitration qualification. Base on WTO's Intellectual Property Right Agreement, it's being defined as private right. Therefore, sovereign principle should be the basic principle of solving intellectual property right disputes. Currently, arbitration qualification is expanding internationally. So both Korea and China must also follow the trend expand the arbitration qualification with a more open minded and forward looking approach, for the good of intellectual property disputes.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.117-138
• /
• 2008

This study lies on building the International Standardization of China Arbitration System for improving a relationship of mutual trust and the safety trade between China and other worldwide countries, especially, South Korea as their one of the biggest trading partners through the comparative analysis of China and UNCITRAL Arbitration Law. In this analysis, the differences from China and UNCITRAL in arbitration law are like belows ; lack of arbitrator's international mind, the limitation of private property right, prohibition of Ad. hoc arbitration, arbitrator's biased nationalism, localism, and their short specialties. a deficiency of the objectiveness for arbitrator's election, a judgement rejection of claimants by using nonattendance and walkout, impossibility of prior and temporary property custody for execution of arbitration award. etc. For the improvement of the International Standardization of China Arbitration, this paper propose as follows: 1) Extension of private property right, reorganization of tax system, realization of open competition, exclusion of 'Sinocentrism', globalization of arbitration system 2) The abolition of old fashioned bureaucracy with approval for ad.hoc arbitration 3) An education for arbitrator's internationalization, specialty, and to promote legal knowledge 4) A settlement of the third country arbitrators' selection for reflecting interested party's decision by the court in a selection system of arbitration committee. 5) Institutionalization of arbitration judgment that prevent for claimant's avoidance by using a withdrawal and an intentional absent 6) A permission of the right of claimant's court custody directly before the begging of arbitration request for the prevention for destruction of evidence and property concealment 7) Grant of the arbitration tribunal's interim measures of protection for private property preservation to the third party, proof security, prevention from the loss that selling the corruptible goods 8) Improvement of arbitration's efficiency from the exclusion of the obstacles that are forgery, concealed evidence, and arbitrator's bribe taking Lastly, I hope that this study will serve to promote friendly economic relationship between China and South Korea and strive for international equilibrium through the achievement of China Arbitration's International Standardization. I will finish this paper with a firm belief that this will lead to more advanced studies.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제52권
• /
• pp.3-22
• /
• 2011

This study examines the seller's liability to transfer the property to the buyer. Even though contracting parties choose CISG as the governing law regulating their obligations and rights by means of their contract, CISG does not concern with the effect generated by the transfer of property. Thus, the issues of the property is settled in conformity with the domestic law applicable by virtue of the rules of private international law. By considering the general rules of the transfer of property in goods under SGA and KCC as the lex rei sitae, the difference of requirements to pass the property between them is analyzed and then the reasons why the transfer of property is importantly considered are discussed. In addition, as CISG does not exclude completely the matters concerning the property and provides the provision like Art 41, the seller's liability to deliver goods free from the third party right or claim is examined under Art 41. Lastly, the practical advice is suggested.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.229-239
• /
• 2011

우리나라의 민간조사제도는 통제 없이 이루어지고 있는 심부름센터, 흥신소 등과 같은 음성적 민간조사의 폐해를 근절하고 개인의 권리보호, 일자리 창출, OECD와 FTA 법률 개방으로부터 우리의 법률시장을 보호할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 민간조사제도 도입을 위한 입법안 검토와 선행연구 고찰, 선진국의 민간조사제도를 비교해 봄으로써 우리나라에 맞는 민간조사제도의 업무영역을 제시하였다. 연구 결과를 통하여 기업, 금융, 보험, 의료, 사이버(cyber), 교통사고, 지적재산권, 실종자, 법과학으로 민간조사업무를 구분하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제11권1_2호
• /
• pp.115-155
• /
• 1980

Nowadays managers of fisheries enterprises and users of accounting information have a considerable interest in the fishery right. The fishery right, which is given by administrative quarters, is referred to exclusive fishing right in a certain coastal fishing ground, and it has been one of the property rights since the turn of the century. The main purpose of this study is to provide an improved accounting method of the fishery right from the side of accounting. To achieve this purpose, legal nature of the fishery right should be understood in the first place, for the fishery right, an intangible asset, is a sort of property right guaranteed by the fisheries laws, According to the basic law in the fisheries "Fisheries Law, " the fishery right is broken down largely into three categories; culture fishing right, set fishing right and common fishing right. The legal characteristics of these fishery rights are as followings: 1. The fishery right is a private right. 2. The fishery right is a property right. 3. The fishery right is a right in rem, and legal provisions pertaining to land are applied to the fishery right with necessary modifications. In addition to the above fishery rights, the Fisheries Law provides some provisions on the so-called entrance right, and those who obtained the right are authorized to access to a certain common fishing right fishing ground where they have been traditionally fishing. In the inland fisheries, the fishery right system similar to that of the coastal fisheries discussed above is adopted in conformity with the Inland Fisheries Developing and Expediting Law. Viewing from an angle of accounting, there are two kinds of additional fishing rights which are dealt as assets. These fishery rights dealt as asset include the license of entry in the so-called permitted fishing which is also called as fishery right in plain language, and tile entrance right obtained abroad. Although these two kinds of rights are not the fishery right from a viewpoint of law, they are regarded as fishing rights in accounting which intends to provide a useful economic information.formation.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.257-264
• /
• 2008

이 연구는 수상에 건설되는 해양건축물의 재산권 공시제도의 문제점을 파악하고 개선안을 제시하기 위한 연구이다. 먼저 해양건축물을 둘러싼 현황을 파악하고 미래를 전망하며 다음으로 해양건축물의 개념과 관련된 법제도를 검토한다. 해양건축물의 재산권 공시제도와 관련하여 현황과 문제점을 파악하며 각종 물건의 공시제도를 검토한다. 마지막으로 해양건축물의 재산권 공시제도 정비방안을 제시한다. 연구 결론으로서 해양건축물 공시제도는 고정식과 부유식 구조물로 나누어 적합한 공시제도를 제안한다. 고정식 구조물은 현행 건축법을 보완 수정하여 부동산등기제도를 활용하며 부유식 구조물은 새로운 법을 제정하여 등록원부와 같은 공적장부를 통한 등록제도를 도입하는 것이 필요하다. 해양건축물이 활성화되고 이를 기반으로 해양산업이 발달하기 위해서는 해양건축물에 관한 소유권 취득과 담보물권 설정 등 재산권 행사를 용이하게 하기 위해 해양건축물의 재산권 공시제도가 속히 마련되어야 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.133-156
• /
• 2004

The rapid development of the internet may not have occurred without techniques of linking and framing, which provide users flexible and easy access to other website. These techniques have enabled internet users to navigate the internet efficiently and sort through the products, services and information available on the internet. The Advent of the global information structure and the do-called EC revolution raise countless new issues and questions. There are no limitations regulating the expressions on the cyberspace due to internet's of quality anonymity? diversity? spontaneity. Therefore, the freedom of speech is expanded in both areas of time and space, which was impossible with the old communicating system. Although online technology raises many new legal issues, the law available to help us resolve them, at least today, is largely based on the world as it existed before online commerce became a reality. Thus the challenge is to predict how these new legal issues may be resolved using the current law. As a result of the drastic change of the environment for international trade of which that has taken took place in parallel with the global information technology revolution on a global basis, the scope of issues to be addressed which should be resolved by the conflict of laws principles has been remarkably expanded, and various new issues of an entirely which are quite new in its type and nature have arisen been raised. Further more in addition, the old act prior act was regarded as insufficient in that it lacked rules on international governing law to adjudicate, or international adjudicatory governing law, where as the expectation of the public was that the private international law should function as the basic law of the legal relational encompassing rules on governing law given the increase of It international disputes. for the move the private international law has also attracted more attention from the korean.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.237-259
• /
• 2010

This paper first gives a brief overview of the history of space law making in the international geopolitical context and recalls some of the main principles as elaborated in the framework of the United Nations. Next, several topics are discussed that will require the attention of space lawyers in the near future. They are the International Space Station, space debris, exploitation of space resources, space tourism, private property rights in space, and militarization and weaponization of space. The paper raises some questions in each of these areas that need to be addressed and concludes that the general legal framework for space activities under public international law as contained in the UN treaties is in place, and is sufficiently general and flexible to enable and encourage states to carry out space activities in an orderly manner. However, as demonstrated by the examples discussed in the paper, the time has come for the international community to agree on the further development of these general principles, starting perhaps with space debris, imminent 'new' uses of space such as space tourism, or some of the 'age old' issues such as the weaponisation of outer space that will continue to require our attention and vigilance. Whether such rules can be in the form of non binding guidelines, codes of conduct and the like, or should be embodied in solid legal instruments creating rights and obligations remains to be seen.

• 철학연구
• /
• 제141권
• /
• pp.133-166
• /
• 2017

이 논문은 흄의 정의(justice) 개념에 초점이 맞추어져 있다. 고대 이래 많은 철학자들은 정의를 아리스토텔레스의 모범에 따라 "분배적 정의"로 이해하고 있다. 정의에 대한 이러한 이해는 근대에까지 이어오는데, 근대에서는 특히 소유권 혹은 사적 재산과 연관해서 다루어진다. 근대에서 사적 소유권은 어떤 경우에도 침해되어서는 안 되는 절대적 권리로 간주된다. 흄은 이 사적 소유권을 정의와 동일시하고 있다. 사적 소유권을 절대 침해해서는 안 된다는 것은 정의를 절대 깨트려서는 안 된다는 것과 동치이다. 흄은 이러한 정의가 어디에서 기원하는가의 문제에 관심을 기울이고 있다. 즉 흄은 칸트식의 정의의 정당화(justification)에 관심을 가지고 있는 것이 아니라, 정의라는 관념의 발생 과정이라는 심리학적 논의에 관심을 두고 있다. 흄의 대답은 "사회적 효용성"이 그 기원이라는 것이다. 공적 사회는 인간이 존재하기 위한 필연적 조건이다. 즉 공적 사회가 존재 혹은 존립하지 않는다면, [현재와 같은] 인간은 존재할 수 없다. 그러면 인간이 존재하기 위한 전제 조건인 공적 사회는 어떻게 존재 혹은 유지될 수 있는가? 흄에 따르면 정의를 통해서 유지된다는 것이다. 그러면 정의의 존재 근거는 어디에 있는가? 흄은 정의의 존재 근거는 자연이 아니라, 인간의 묵계(convention)에 있다는 것이다. 인간은 묵계를 통해서 정의를 암묵적으로 받아들이며, 그렇게 함으로써 인간은 자신의 존재를 유지할 수 있다. 이것이 흄의 개략적인 통찰이다. 흄은 이런 자신의 주장을 관철하기 위해서 매우 다양한 개념들을 구사한다. 본 논문은 이러한 다양한 개념을 중심으로 인간의 정의 개념이 어떻게 형성되는가를 흄의 관점에서 조망하고자 한다.