• Title/Summary/Keyword: preclinical test

Search Result 56, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

A 90-day repeated-dose oral toxicity study on Flos lonicerae extract in Fischer 344/N rats (금은화(Flos lonicerae) 추출물의 Fischer 344/N 랫드를 이용한 90일간 반복 경구투여 독성시험)

  • Han, Zhong-Ze;Zhang, Hu-Song;Kang, Sang-Chul;Gil, Ki-Hyun;Kong, Kwang-Han;Kim, Do-Hyung;Ahn, Tae-Hwan;Bae, Jin-Sook;Go, Hyeon-Kyu;Han, Myoung-Kyu;Kim, Hak-Soo;Heo, Hyun-Suk;Park, Eun-Mi;Song, Si-Whan;Kim, Kap-Ho;Park, Chan-Koo;Lee, Hyun-Kul
    • Korean Journal of Veterinary Research
    • /
    • v.48 no.4
    • /
    • pp.401-411
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study was performed to evaluate repeated-dose oral toxicities of Flos lonicerae extract in Fischer 344/n rats. Flos lonicerae was administered orally to rats at dose levels of 0, 37, 111, 333, 1,000 and 2,000 mg/kg/day. Each group consisted of 10 rats of each gender. The Flos lonicerae extract was given once a day, 5 times a week, for 90 day repeatedly. This study was conducted in accordance with the Protocol of Korea National Toxicology Program and The Standards of Toxicity Study for Medicinal Products. In the present study, there were no toxicologically significant changes in mortality, clinical signs, body weight gains, ophthalmoscopy, urine analysis, hematology, serum biochemistry, necropsy findings, organ weights, histopathology, estrus cycle and sperm examination of all animals treated with Flos lonicerae extract. These results suggest that the oral no observed adverse-effect level of the test item, Flos lonicerae extract, in rats is higher than 2,000 mg/kg/day in both genders. The target organs were not established.

A 90-day repeated-dose oral toxicity study on Chelidonium majus extract in Fischer 344/N rats (백굴채(Chelidonium majus) 추출물의 Fischer 344/N 랫드를 이용한 90일간 반복 경구투여 독성시험)

  • Kim, Do-Hyung;Zhang, Hu-Song;Kim, Kwang-Ho;Kang, Sang-Chul;Kim, Hak-Soo;Gil, Ki-Hyun;Kong, Kwang-Han;Ahn, Tae-Hwan;Bae, Jin-Sook;Go, Hyeon-Kyu;Kim, Kap-Ho;Park, Chan-Koo;Lee, Hyun-Kul;Song, Si-Whan;Han, Zhong-Ze
    • Korean Journal of Veterinary Research
    • /
    • v.49 no.1
    • /
    • pp.23-34
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study was performed to evaluate repeated-dose oral toxicities of Chelidonium majus extract in Fischer 344/N rats. Chelidonium majus extract was administered orally to rats at dose levels of 0, 25, 74, 222, 666 and 2,000 mg/kg/day. Each group consisted of 10 rats of each gender. The Chelidonium majus extract was given once a day, 5 times a week, for 90 day repeatedly. This study was conducted in accordance with the Protocol of Korea National Toxicology Program (issued by National Institute of Toxicological Research) and The Standards of Toxicity Study for Medicinal Products (issued by Korea Food and Drug Administration). In the present study, There were no toxicologically significant changes in mortality, clinical signs, body weight gains, ophthalmoscopy, urine analysis, hematology, serum biochemistry, necropsy findings, organ weights, histopathology, estrus cycle and sperm examination of all animals treated with Chelidonium majus extract. These results suggest that the oral no observed adverse-effect level of the test item, Chelidonium majus extract, in rats is higher than 2,000 mg/kg/day in both genders. The target organs were not established.

The Effects of Preclinical Clinical Performance Examination on Nursing Students' Confidence in Nursing Skills and Critical Thinking Competence (임상실습 전 임상수행능력평가(CPX)가 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술 자신감과 비판적 사고능력에 미치는 효과)

  • Park, Jeong Sook;Choi, Mi Jung;Jang, Soon Yang
    • The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.75-85
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of preclinical clinical performance examination (CPX) on nursing students' confidence in their nursing skills and critical thinking competence. Methods: The design of this research was one-group pretest-posttest, and the participants were 112 nursing students. The preclinical CPX consisted of a clinical examination, patient-nurse relationship, oral test of related knowledge, written test of the nursing process, and debriefing using comprehensive scenarios based on real patient cases. The confidence of nursing skills consisted of an 8-item NRS and the critical thinking competence consisted of a 12-item 4-point scale developed by researchers and measured in both the pretest and posttest. The collected data were analyzed using paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The score for confidence in nursing skills (t=10.60, p<.001) and that for critical thinking competence (t=7.03, p<.001) increased significantly after preclinical CPX. Conclusion: This study showed that preclinical CPX was effective in improving nursing students' confidence in their nursing skills and critical thinking competence. Therefore, preclinical CPX is expected to be utilized in nursing practice education. Additional studies including those on control groups are recommended to compare differences between the preclinical CPX group and control group.

The effect of ginsenosides on depression in preclinical studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Kim, Yunna;Cho, Seung-Hun
    • Journal of Ginseng Research
    • /
    • v.45 no.3
    • /
    • pp.420-432
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background: Many ginsenosides have been shown to be efficacious for major depressive disorder (MDD), which is a highly recurrent disorder, through several preclinical studies. We aimed to review the literature assessing the antidepressant effects of ginsenosides on MDD animal models, to establish systematic scientific evidence in a rigorous manner. Methods: We performed a systematic review on the antidepressant effects of ginsenoside evaluated in in vivo studies. We searched for preclinical trials from inception to July 2019 in electronic databases such as Pubmed and Embase. In vivo studies examining the effect of a single ginsenoside on animal models of primary depression were included. Items of each study were evaluated by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess behavioral changes induced by ginsenoside Rg1, which was the most studied ginsenoside. Data were pooled using the random-effects models. Results: A total of 517 studies were identified, and 23 studies were included in the final analysis. They reported on many ginsenosides with different antidepressant effects and biological mechanisms of action. Of the 12 included articles assessing ginsenoside Rg1, pooled results of forced swimming test from 9 articles (mean difference (MD): 20.50, 95% CI: 16.13-24.87), and sucrose preference test from 11 articles (MD: 28.29, 95% CI: 22.90-33.69) showed significant differences compared with vehicle treatment. The risk of bias of each study was moderate, but there was significant heterogeneity across studies. Conclusion: These estimates suggest that ginsenosides, including ginsenoside Rg1, reduces symptoms of depression, modulates underlying mechanisms, and can be a promising antidepressant.

Veterinary management protocol for non-human primates: quarantine, anesthesia, and postoperative care for mastoidectomy at animal research institutions

  • Yoon Beom Lee;Woori Jo;Eui-Suk Jeong;Tae Ku Kang;Gwang-Hoon Lee
    • Korean Journal of Veterinary Research
    • /
    • v.63 no.4
    • /
    • pp.35.1-35.10
    • /
    • 2023
  • Non-human primate (NHP) research faces challenges due to zoonosis risk and complex veterinary management yet lacks standardized guidelines for animal care. Therefore, we developed an advanced veterinary management protocol for NHP quarantine, anesthesia, and postoperative care. Three female 4 to 5-year-old cynomolgus monkeys were anesthetized and underwent various tests, including body weight, temperature, blood tests, urinalysis, microbiological monitoring, and physical and dental examinations. Ivermectin and medicated baths were administered to eradicate ectoparasites and endoparasites, and testing was repeated 30 days later. Following quarantine, we performed computed tomography and anesthesia maintenance for mastoidectomy. To relieve pain and maintain body weight, we administered tramadol intramuscularly 4 times/day for 3 days and meloxicam subcutaneously twice daily for 14 days. Feed replacements were provided. During the 33-day quarantine period, physical examinations revealed no abnormalities indicative of infectious diseases, and no specific clinical symptoms were observed. Through a preliminary test of anesthesia time, we selected ketamine 4 mg/kg + medetomidine 50 ㎍/kg for short experiments such as computed tomography, and ketamine 8 mg/kg + medetomidine 50 ㎍/kg for intubation. Ten days after mastoidectomy, NHPs consumed 100 kcal/kg and recovered their body weight. This study offers advanced veterinary management guideline for NHP research. Such protocols can lead to more standardized and ethical practices in NHP research, thereby enhancing the quality of studies on NHPs and the translation of findings to human health and disease.

Validity and Reliability of a Clinical Performance Examination using Standardized Patients (호흡기계 표준화 환자를 이용한 간호대 학생의 임상수행능력평가 타당도와 신뢰도 검증)

  • Choi, Ja-Yun;Jang, Keum-Seong;Choi, Soon-Hee;Hong, Mi-Soon
    • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    • /
    • v.38 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-91
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the validity of a modified clinical performance examination (CPX) for preclinical students in nursing. Method: 70 nursing students in their second semester of the junior year at C University participated in CPX. Scenarios and checklists were developed by our research team from September to October 2005. Six stations were organized. Evaluation included physical examination of a patient with lung cancer, education on usage of a metered dosage inhaler, and lobectomy postoperative care. Students were randomly assigned to a station. Result: There was a difference in the CPX scores according to stations. The agreement of scoring between trained faculty members and SPs was more than moderate (r=.647). The correlation between the CPX score and the average grade in the previous semester and between the CPX score and the average grade of a paper and pen test of the pulmonary system of adults was low (r=.276; r=.048). Conclusion: Traditional CPX is generally recommended, however, modified CPX is appropriate for preclinical students in the current Korean Nursing school setting if there are additional scoring systems to balance the testing level at each station.

The Usefulness of a Wearable Smart Insole for Gait and Balance Analyses After Surgery for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Immediate and Delayed Effects (척추측만증 환자의 수술 효과 평가 수단으로서 웨어러블 스마트 깔창을 이용한 보행분석의 유용성)

  • Seo, Min Seok;Shin, Myung Jun;Kwon, Ae Ran;Park, Tae Sung;Nam, Kyoung Hyup
    • Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.184-192
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study presents a gait analysis method (including time series analysis) using a smart insole as an objective and quantitative evaluating method after lumbar scoliosis surgery. The participant is a degenerative lumbar scoliosis patient. She took 3-min-gait-test four times(before and 8, 16, and 204-days after surgery) and 6-min-gait-test once(204-days after surgery) with smart-insoles in her shoes. Each insole has 8-pressure sensors, an accelerometer, and a gyroscope. The measured values were used to compare the characteristics of gait before and after surgery. The analysis showed that all of the patient's gait parameters improved after surgery. And after 6 months, the gait was more stable. However, after long walk, the swing duration of one leg was slightly shorter than that of the other again. It was a preclinical problem that could not be found in the visual examination by the practitioner. With this analysis method we could evaluate the improvement of patient quantitatively and objectively. And we could find a preclinical problem. This analysis method will lead to the studies that define and distinguish gait patterns of certain diseases, helping to determine appropriate treatments.

The Effects of Preclinical Objective Structured Clininal Examination(OSCE) on Knowledge, Nursing Students Confidence in Core Fundamental Nursing Skills and Self-Efficacy (임상실습 전 객관화된 구조화 임상수행평가(OSCE)가 간호대학생의 지식, 핵심기본간호술 자신감 및 자기효능감에 미치는 효과)

  • Son, Yu-Lim;Park, Pil-Nam;Ko, Soon-Hee
    • Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.850-863
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of preclinical OSCE(Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation) on knowledge, confidence in their Core fundamental nursing skills and self-efficacy in nursing students. Method. The research design was a one group pretest-posttest design and it was done to assess changes in knowledge, confidence in core fundamental nursing skills and self-efficacy from pre to the post-test which was given after the OSCE. Data were collected from March 5 to April 7, 2016 from 37 nursing students who were taking the 15-hours using OSCE learning module at one Gyeongbuk-do, P-city. This practicum was composed of 4 core fundamental nursing skills and 5 other fundamental nursing skills. The knowledge consisted of a 10-item by researchers and the confidence of core fundamental nursing skills consisted of an 9-item NRS and the self-efficacy consisted of a 17-item 5-point scale and measured in both the pretest and posttest. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS IBM 20.0 program for the frequency, percentage, x2-test, and paired t-test. Rusult. The results showed that although scores of knowledge of OSCE learning module were significanlty increased from 5.22 to 7.03(t=5.30, p<.001). There were significantly increased in scores of confidence in core fundamental nursing skills from 5.13 to 7.27(t=10.01, p<.001), In the sub-scales of each core fundamental nursing skills was scored the highest. otherwise, there was no significant difference in self-efficacy(t=1.42, p=.161). Conclusions. Based on the results, this study suggests that OSCE module development activities for nursing students in nursing education-learning in order to improve nursing skills.

2-Week repeated oral dose toxicity study of 1,4-dichlorobutane in rats (1,4-Dichlorobutane의 랫드 2주 반복경구투여독성시험)

  • Kim, Jong-Kyu;Lee, In-Chul;Kim, Sung-Hwan;Baek, Hyung-Seon;Bae, Jin-Sook;Song, Si-Whan;Kim, Jong-Choon;Chung, Yong-Hyun
    • Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-10
    • /
    • 2013
  • Objectives: The present study investigated the potential subacute toxicity of 1,4-dichlorobutane (1,4-DCB) by a 2-week repeated oral dose in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Materials and Methods: The test chemical was administered once daily by gavage to male rats at dose levels of 0, 74, 222, 667, and 2000 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks. All rats were sacrificed at the end of treatment period. During the test period, clinical signs, mortality, body weights, food and water consumption, urinalysis, hematology, serum biochemistry, gross findings, and organ weights were examined. Results: At 2000 mg/kg/day, treatment-related clinical signs, as evidenced by hypothermia, decreased locomotor activity, piloerection, lying on side, and prone position were observed. All the rats were found dead on test day 2. At 667 mg/kg/day, polyuria, suppressed body weight gain, food consumption, and spleen and thymus weights, and increased adrenal gland and liver weights were observed.Hematological and serum biochemical investigations revealed increases in the alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphataseand total bilirubinand decreases in the serum $Na^+$ level, white blood cell count and lymphocyte ratio. There were no treatment-related adverse effects in the 74 and 222 mg/kg/day groups. Conclusions: In the present experimental conditions, target organs were determined to be spleen, thymus,and liver. The no-observed-adverse-effect level was considered to be 222 mg/kg/day in male rats.

Effect of Argumentation Instruction on Medical Student Experiences with Problem-Based Learning (논증강화교육이 의학과 학생의 문제바탕학습 경험에 미치는 영향)

  • Ju, Hyunjung
    • Korean Medical Education Review
    • /
    • v.19 no.2
    • /
    • pp.101-108
    • /
    • 2017
  • When participating in problem-based learning (PBL), it is important for medical students to generate claims and provide justifications for their claims in small group discussions. This study aimed to investigate the effect of argumentation instruction on medical student learning experiences with PBL. A total of one hundred first-year preclinical students from Inje University College of Medicine, who had attended argumentation instruction, participated in this study. All of the participants completed a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire regarding their learning experiences with PBL, before and after the argumentation instruction. The questionnaire comprised 22 items with eight subcategories: argumentation activity, reflection, integration of basic and clinical science, identification of lack of knowledge, logical thinking, self-directed study, communication, and attitude toward discussion. The collected data were analyzed through a paired-sample t-test. The results of this study found that the argumentation instruction promoted the preclinical students' experiences with argumentation activities, reflection, an integration of basic and clinical science, the identification of their lack of knowledge, logical thinking, and self-directed study, and it increased positive attitudes toward group discussion. The findings suggest argumentation instruction can enhance medical student group discussions and help students achieve the objectives of PBL, including acquisition of basic and clinical science knowledge and development of clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities, which can highlight the meaningful learning experiences students have with PBL.