• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.13-34
• /
• 2011

This paper investigates the interaction among the paradigm of Low-Carbon Society (LCS) and the megatrends in field of population, environment, geopolitics, and energy. The paradigm of LCS is regarded as a 'social will' trend, distinguished from other 'phenomenal' trends. The qualitative analysis shows that the megatrends and the LCS paradigm have positive/neutral/negative impacts on one another, while some impacts can be reversed to other types of impact with the conditions having ripened. In quantitative analysis, the correlation between the LCS paradigm and the economy is traced with our Integrated Assessment Model, looking into such response options as population control, increase in labor force participation, and productivity enhancement to maintain utility level despite the pursuit of LCS paradigm. The future challenges in national strategy and S&T policy are suggested, based on the interaction analyses.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.91-111
• /
• 2010

An efficient industry structure is essential for competitive IT Service industry in a global world. The purpose of this research is to derive a policy direction paradigm for strengthening IT service industry structure. To find an effective policy direction, an in-depth analysis on deep-rooted problems of IT service industry has been conducted. The root-causes of industry problems are found with new perspectives on IT service industry. Past and present policies on IT service industry have been reviewed based on desirable industry behavior. A new policy paradigm and a roadmap for efficient industry policy are suggested. To justify adequacy of new policy direction, global benchmarking has been performed. USA, Germany, and Japan's IT service industry has been reviewed based on global competitiveness and desirable eco-system. And an in-depth analysis has been performed for two big competitors, India and China, The adequacy of the new policy paradigm has been tested, and mostly approved. IT service industry policy needs to be transformed from manufacturing concepts to service concepts, from domestic focus to global focus, from zero-sum policy to positive-sum policy, from supplier focus to market focus, from internal industry itself to co-growth with main industries. etc. The results of this study can be used for policy adjusting and policy making to strengthen IT service industry's global competitiveness and to improve long-term performance of Korean economy. Further in-depth researches with quantitative analysis will be needed to fully justify the adequacy of the derived new policy directions.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.13-28
• /
• 2015

산림의 경제적 가치의 중요성에 따라 산림이용과 개발의 패러다임이 산림정책의 지배적 패러다임으로 등장하였다. 산림이 웰니스의 중요한 수단으로 인식되면서 이용과 보전의 융합이 모색되었고 산림정책의 패러다임도 산림을 이용한 휴양, 복지 및 웰니스(wellness) 등 새로운 정책가치들을 지향하게 되었다. 따라서 본 연구는 산림정책에 새로운 가치들이 어떻게 융합되었는지를 컨텐츠 분석과 네트워크 분석이 결합된 텍스트 네트워크 분석을 통해 분석하고자 하였다. 분석결과에 따르면, 제4차 산림기본계획에 비해 제5차 산림기본계획에서는 임산물 생산에서 벗어나 산림이용과 산림휴양기능이 강화된 것으로 분석되었다. 산림을 통한 치유, 건강, 산림의 복지적인 기능 등에 대한 정책과 산림이용과 보전이 융합된 경영기반 마련에는 미흡한 것으로 나타났으며 한국의 산림정책에서 지속가능한 융합패러다임이 보이고 있다. 정책적 함의로서 국가산림기본계획 수립에 있어 산림이용과 보전을 융합할 수 있는 정책역량의 강화가 필요하다는 점을 제시할 수 있다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2002

This paper suggests a new paradigm of science and technology (S&T) policy for the purpose of the new national development that pursues not the scale expansion of a industrial production but the qualitative enhancement of industrial and S&T comparativeness. The new S&T policy paradigm includes new policy directions such as the density increasement of high quality- brain power and the energy supply for crossing the threshold from imitative R&D to creative R&D. Also, this paper argues that it is necessary not only to acquire the support of the local S&T community and policy-makers on the new S&T policy paradigm, but also to develop and implement policy measures in details on the basis of the new paradigm suggested by the paper.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.43-58
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 역대 정부 창업정책을 Hall(1993)의 정책 패러다임(Policy Paradigm) 관점에서 분석하였다. 총 195건의 신문기사와 202건의 정부 문서를 살펴보고, 각 정부 별 정책목표, 정책수단, 그리고 정책수단의 수준변화 분석을 통해 정책 패러다임 변동을 확인하였다. 첫 번째 패러다임 구축 시기는 제5·6공화국으로 1986년 「중소기업창업 지원법」 제정과 함께 제조업 중심의 창업 촉진 및 성장·발전 지원이라는 목표 설정으로 창업정책 패러다임이 처음 구축된 시기이다. 다음은 국민의 정부시기로 IMF 외환위기 대응을 위한 「벤처기업육성에 관한 특별조치법」제정으로 벤처기업 창업 촉진과 육성이라는 새로운 정책 목표를 설정하고, 이를 달성하기 위한 수단을 강구하였다. 마지막 패러다임 변화는 4차 산업혁명과 코로나19에 적절히 대응하기 위해 문재인 정부시기에 이루어졌다. 「중소기업창업 지원법」전부개정을 통해 창업 개념 확장, 신산업·기술창업 지원 및 집중 육성을 도모하였으며, 벤처투자관련 법을 일원화하고 정비하였다. 또한 중소기업청을 중소벤처기업부로 승격시켜, 창업정책을 주도적으로 실행할 수 있도록 하였다. 특히, 본 연구는 최근 창업정책 이슈인 창업기업의 낮은 생존율과 민간투자 활성화에 대하여 살펴보고, 새로운 창업정책 패러다임 변동의 필요성을 제시하였다.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 2017

전체 미혼모의 90% 이상이 입양을 선택했던 과거와 다르게, 최근 들어 자녀의 양육을 선택하는 미혼모가 눈에 띄게 증가하기 시작하였다. 이와 더불어 연령, 교육수준, 노동시장 참여 등의 인구사회학적 특성들도 과거에 비하여 전체적으로 향상되는 추세이다. 그러나 여전히 많은 미혼모들이 빈곤을 비롯하여 다양한 어려움을 호소하고 있다. 이는 오랜 사회적 편견과 차별 속에서 자녀 양육과 생계부양자의 역할을 동시에 수행하는 양육미혼모가 직면하는 어려움들은 개인적 특성의 발전 향상만으로 해결될 수 없으며, 미혼모의 자녀양육 지원을 위한 사회적 개입이 필요함을 보여준다. 이에 본 연구는 한국사회 미혼모 지원정책의 전개과정 및 패러다임의 변화를 살펴보고, 현재 미혼모 가족을 위해 제공되고 있는 정책의 현황과 한계를 전반적 정책 기조의 변화 속에서 검토하였다. 한국사회의 미혼모 정책은 2000년대 중반을 기점으로 기존의 입양 중심에서 미혼모의 자녀양육을 지원하는 쪽으로 패러다임 전환이 이루어진 것으로 관찰되었다. 그러나 현재 양육미혼모에게 제공되는 있는 사회적 지원의 수준은 정책기조의 변화에 미치지 못하고 있어, 미혼모가 자녀를 양육하기에는 아직도 상당한 어려움이 따르고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막 결론에서는 미혼모의 자녀양육을 효율적으로 지원하기 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.176-185
• /
• 2021

This paper aims to develop a new paradigm for groundwater management which is compatible with integrated water management policies in Korea. Three key roles of groundwater are defined for addressing water cycle distortion, high water stress, water quality degradation, aquatic ecosystems deterioration, and water-related hazards. Firstly, groundwater plays an important role in contributing soundness of water cycle as a component of water cycle. Secondly, it is a local water resource to ensure water supply sustainability. Thirdly, groundwater is an essential water resource for drought and emergencies. In order to support the groundwater roles, we propose a paradigm shift for groundwater management and policy directions towards integrated water management. The new paradigm consists of managements for sound water cycle on a watershed scale and groundwater environment(quantity, quality, and groundwater dependent ecosystems) managements for both human and nature. A prospective management also constitutes the new paradigm. In addition, this paper proposes four policy directions in groundwater management. The policies emphasize the integrated management of groundwater and surface water, management of groundwater environment(quantity, quality, and groundwater dependent ecosystems), management of groundwater uses for water sustainability and security, and enhancement of groundwater publicity.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.382-410
• /
• 2018

We have identified the paradigm, the knowledge structure, and the roles of S&T policy studies in Korea by empirical analysis and focus group interviews. First, it provisionally concluded that S&T policy studies in Korea are still in the pre-paradigm stage. Specifically, the level of consensus among scholars about the "academic definition of discipline" and "research scope", which is essential for an independent discipline, is still low. Next, a great part of the existing S&T policy studies in Korea is excessively weighted in specific research scopes and researcher groups. For a balanced development as an academic discipline, such imbalance must be overcome. Third, the studies in Korea showed that much of the research in the earlier stage was fragmented at the micro-level. More recently, however, S&T policy studies show co-evolutionary patterns, which increase the responsiveness of the society. Based on this analysis, the future direction of studies should form a unique flow of our own, building Korean policy cases and models rather than following those developed countries.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2006

This study discusses two canceled dam projects, Youngwol Dam in South Korea and Two Forks Dam in Colorado of the United States. Both of them illustrate how the new paradigm applies to regional water projects because they became victims of environmental opposition in the new paradigm. While the cases have no apparent close relationships and they occurred in different decades, they offer interesting comparisons. They were basically struggles between water development coalitions and environmental protection coalitions on regional water conflicts. The two proposed projects brought about fierce debates on large dam as they embraced a wide-range of environmental, social, and political issues rather than construction of dams themselves. Huge anti-dam oppositions scrapped them at the cost of nearly ten years for decision-makings and enormous financial resources for feasibility studies respectively. It identifies who the policy actors were, what the policy strategies were, and how the water policies evolved in both countries. The decision-makings on the two projects appeared at first glance to be made under formal institutional frameworks, but in actuality, they relied significantly on decisions of the two important political actors. The Korean society began to learn negotiation and cooperation approaches to solve the water conflict by establishing the Joint Task Force Team on Youngwol project in 1999. The team is recognized as a new conflict resolution method in South Korea because a diverse of stakeholder interests voluntarily participated in the decision-making process and discussed water issues directly. Even though the projects resulted in futile fruits in each country, they illustrate the images of the new paradigm that significantly affected in formulating regional water policies in South Korea and the United States.

• 한국물환경학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.397-405
• /
• 2006

Since the first sewage treatment plant had been in operation in 1976, the Korean water industry was in the logarithmic growing stage corresponded with the country's rapid economic expansion up to late 1990's. Unfortunately, however, the current industry status seems to require not only new paradigm for water environment but the development of new growth engine, since there are various warning signals for stalling growth from the field engineers to policy makers. Because of sharing of the awareness, the Korean government recently launched an ambitious development policy for water industry. This paper describes the new paradigm-shift in water environment in view point of the water as renewable resources. Based on the new paradigm, it has been suggested the prerequisite conditions to meet for the development of a new Korean water industry.