• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.519-546
• /
• 2004

On June 27, 2002 Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) launched dot-ca domain name dispute resolution service through BCICAC and Resolution Canada, Inc. The Domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (CDRP) of CIRA is basically modelled after Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(UDRP), while the substance of CDRP is slightly modified to meet the need of Canadian domain name regime and its legal system. Firstly, this article examined CIRA's domain name dispute resolution policy in general. It is obvious that the domain name dispute resolution proceeding is non-binding arbitration to which arbitration law does not apply. However it still belongs to the arbitration and far from the usual mediation process. Domain name arbitrators render decision rather than assist disputing parties themselves reach to agreement. In this respect the domain name arbitration is similar to arbitration or litigation rather than mediation. Secondly it explored how the panels applied the substantive standards in domain name arbitration. There is some criticism that panelists interprets the test of "confusingly similar" in conflicting manner. As a result critics assert that courts' judicial review is necessary to reduce the conflicting interpretation on the test of substantive standards stipulated in paragraph 3 of CDRP. Finally, it analysed the court's position on domain name arbitral award. Canadian courts do not seem to establish a explicit standard for judicial review over it yet. However, in Black v. Molson case Ontario Superior Court applied the UDRP rules in examining the WIPO panel's decision, while US courts often apply domestic patent law and ACPA(Anticyber -squatting Consumer's Protection Act) to review domain name arbitration decision rather than UDRP rules. In conclusion this article suggests that courts should restrict their judicial review on domain name administrative panel's decision at best. This will lead to facilitating the use of ADR in domain name dispute resolution and reducing the burden of courts' dockets.

• 전자공학회논문지 IE
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.20-26
• /
• 2007

지금까지의 이동 네트워크 환경에서의 연구는 주로 경로 설정 방법에 대해 이루어겼으나, 실제 사용자에게 서비스를 제공하기 위해서는 DNS(Domain Name System)가 우선적으로 지원되어야 한다 이동 애드혹 네트워크의 고유한 특성으로 인하여 유선 네트워크에서 사용되고 있는 DNS를 그대로 도입하는 것은 문제가 발생한다. 분산 방식 DNS를 사용하는 경우에는 노드의 이동에 대해 효율적으로 대처할 수 있다는 장점을 가지나, 도메인 네임 충돌 문제를 해결하기 위한 오버헤드가 발생하게 되며, 중앙 방식 DNS를 사용하는 경우에는 네임 정보 획득을 위한 통신이 유니캐스트 기반으로 동작하고 네임의 할당 및 관리에 따른 오버헤드 문제를 해결할 수는 있으나 DNS서버의 이동에 따른 DNS네임 서비스의 연속성 있는 지원 문제가 해결되어야 한다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 이동 애드혹 네트워크 환경에서 중앙 방식 DNS를 기반으로 연속성 있는 서비스를 지원하면서도 네임 할당 및 관리에 있어서 효율적으로 동작하는 Manet DNS를 제안하며 서버의 이동성으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 네트워크 병합 및 분할 문제에 대한 해결책을 제시한다.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.41-50
• /
• 2011

DNS(Domain Name System)는 인터넷상의 호스트의 도메인주소를 IP주소로 변환하거나 IP주소를 도메인주소로 변환하는 이름해결 메카니즘을 총칭한다. 본 논문에서는 1차 DNS 서버가 오류로 인해 정지하더라도 2차 DNS 서버가 대신하여 서비스를 지속할 수 있도록 하는 결함내성을 갖는 DNS 시스템 구축에 관해 연구하였다.

• ETRI Journal
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.243-246
• /
• 2006

In a mobile ad hoc network, difficulties exist in supporting address autoconfiguration and naming resolution due to the lack of centralized servers. This letter presents a novel approach, called name-based autoconfiguration (NBA), which uses host names to determine IP addresses and provides address autoconfiguration and name resolution as a single protocol.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.167-187
• /
• 2007

As Korea has reached a free trade agreement with the United States of America, it is required to provide an appropriate procedure to ".kr" domain name disputes based on the principles established in the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(UDRP). Currently, Internet address Dispute Resolution Committee(IDRC) established under Article 16 of the Act on Internet Address Resources provides the dispute resolution proceedings to resolve ".kr" domain name disputes. While the IDRC's proceeding is similar to the UDRP administrative proceeding in procedural aspects, the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy that is established by the IDRC and that applies to disputes involving ".kr" domain names is very different from the UDRP for generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) in substantial aspects. Under the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement(KORUS FTA), it is expected that either the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy to be amended to adopt the UDRP or the IDRC to examine the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy in order to harmonize it with the principles established in the UDRP. It is a common practice of cybersquatters to warehouse a number of domain names without any active use of these domain names after their registration. The Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy provides that the complainant may request to transfer or delete the registration of the disputed domain name if the registrant registered, holds or uses the disputed domain name in bad faith. This provision lifts the complainant's burden of proof to show the respondent's bad faith because the complainant is only required to prove one of the three bad faiths which are registration in bad faith, holding in bad faith, or use in bad faith. The aforementioned resolution procedure is different from the UDRP regime which requires the complainant, in compliance with paragraph 4(b) of the UDRP, to prove that the disputed domain name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. Therefore, the complainant carries heavy burden of proof under the UDRP. The IDRC should deny the complaint if the respondent has legitimate rights or interests in the domain names. Under the UDRP, the complainant must show that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The UDRP sets out three illustrative circumstances, any one of which if proved by the respondent, shall be evidence of the respondent's rights to or legitimate interests in the domain name. As the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy provides only a general provision regarding the respondent's legitimate rights or interests, the respondent can be placed in a very week foundation to be protected under the Policy. It is therefore recommended for the IDRC to adopt the three UDRP circumstances to guide how the respondent can demonstrate his/her legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name. In accordance with the KORUS FTA, the Korean Government is required to provide online publication to a reliable and accurate database of contact information concerning domain name registrants. Cybersquatters often provide inaccurate contact information or willfully conceal their identity to avoid objection by trademark owners. It may cause unnecessary and unwarranted delay of the administrative proceedings. The respondent may loss the opportunity to assert his/her rights or legitimate interests in the domain name due to inability to submit the response effectively and timely. The respondent could breach a registration agreement with a registrar which requires the registrant to submit and update accurate contact information. The respondent who is reluctant to disclose his/her contact information on the Internet citing for privacy rights and protection. This is however debatable as the respondent may use the proxy registration service provided by the registrar to protect the respondent's privacy.

• Journal of Communications and Networks
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.416-427
• /
• 2009

Domain name system (DNS) is a primary identification mechanism for Internet applications. However, DNS resolutions often take an unbearably long time, and this could seriously impair the consistency of the service quality of Internet applications based on DNS such as World Wide Web. Several approaches reduce DNS resolution time by proactively refreshing expired cached records or prefetching available records beforehand, but these approaches have an inherent problem in that they cause additional DNS traffic. In this paper, we propose a DNS resolution time reduction scheme, named renewal using piggyback (RUP), which refreshes expired cached records by piggybacking them onto solicited DNS queries instead of by issuing additional DNS queries. This method decreases both DNS resolution time and DNS traffic since it reduces the number of queries generated to handle a given DNS resolution without generating additional DNS messages. Simulation results based on two large independent DNS traces show that our proposed approach much reduces not only the DNS resolution time but also the DNS traffic.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 2002년도 Language, Information, and Computation Proceedings of The 16th Pacific Asia Conference
• /
• pp.50-58
• /
• 2002

The information extraction is to delimit in advance, as part of the specification of the task, the semantic range of the output and to filter information from large volumes of texts. The most representative word of the document is composed of named entities and pronouns. Therefore, it is important to resolve coreference in order to extract the meaningful information in information extraction. Coreference resolution is to find name entities co-referencing real-world entities in the documents. Results of coreference resolution are used for name entity detection and template generation. This paper presents the heuristic-based approach for coreference resolution in Korean. We constructed the heuristics expanded gradually by using the corpus and derived the salience factors of antecedents as the importance measure in Korean. Our approach consists of antecedents selection and antecedents weighting. We used three kinds of salience factors that are used to weight each antecedent of the anaphor. The experiment result shows 80% precision.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.261-268
• /
• 2008

논문의 저자는 일반적으로 저자명으로 표현되며, 저자명을 통한 저자의 표현 및 관련 논문의 검색은 해당 시스템의 정확률과 재현율을 저하시키게 된다. 이는 같은 저자명을 적는 여러 다른 형태가 존재할 뿐만 아니라, 같은 저자명으로 논문에 기술되었으나 실제 서로 다른 사람일 수 있기 때문이다. 이 문제의 해결을 위해서는, 논문의 저자로 출현하는 동일한 인명 표현을 실세계의 서로 다른 개체로 구분하는 저자 식별처리가 필요하다. 기존 저자 식별의 자질로, 논문의 기본 서지 항목들인 저자, 논문제목, 출처 등이 사용되었으나, 저자 식별 성능 개선을 위해서는 새로운 자질의 도입이 요구된다. 이 연구에서는 한 개인의 고유 식별자로 기능할 수 있는 저자의 전자메일주소 자질을 저자 식별 문제에 적용하고자 한다. 이를 위해 논문원문으로부터의 저자 메일주소의 추출 문제를 다루고, 추출된 메일주소 자질이 저자 식별에 미치는 영향을 대용량 테스트셋을 통해 평가하고 분석한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.131-149
• /
• 2010

Since the Arbitration Law of China took effect in 1995, arbitration has grown with the economy. At the end of 2009, there were 202 arbitration institutions in China. Among them, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) has adopted online arbitration and has settled internet domain name disputes since 2001. CIETAC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center(DNDRC) has accumulated abundant experiences of online arbitration in the field of domain name disputes. Based on those experiences, on 1 May 2009, CIETAC implemented the CIETAC Online Arbitration Rules(Rules') to regulate the resolution of e-business disputes as well as other business disputes. With this background, this article aims to study the status quo, practices and issues of online arbitration conducted by CIETAC. For the purpose of the article, a general picture of online arbitration is outlined first, followed by introducing the steps of the online arbitration procedure. According to the 'Rules', the entire arbitration process is conducted using online communication methods which are cost-effective and efficient. To facilitate the development of online arbitration, legal barriers need to be removed. This article considers main legal issues of online arbitration in China and proposes amendment to Chinese Arbitration Law, in particular, the recognition of the validity of electronic arbitration agreements and awards.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.2267-2285
• /
• 2016

Information Centric Networking that uses content name instead of IP address as routing identifier can handle challenges such as traffic explosion and user mobility, but it also suffers from scalability and incompatibility problems. In this paper by combining the concept of software defined networking and Internet end to end arguments, we propose a wide area deployable software defined information centric networking service model named SD-ICN. SD-ICN employs a dual space structure that separates edge service network and core transmission network. The enhanced SDN techniques are used in edge service network in order to implement intelligent data routing and caching, while traditional IP technique is reserved in core transmission network so as to provide wide area high speed data transmission. Besides, a distributed name resolution system based on the cooperation of different controllers is also presented. The prototype experiments in our campus network show that SD-ICN can be deployed in a scalable and incremental way with no modification of the core network, and can support typical communication modes such as multicast, mobility, multihoming, load balancing, and multipath data transmission effectively.