• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.45-61
• /
• 2005

This study develops the evaluation model for e-Business company using analytic hierarchy process. As the first step of this study, we derived the appraisal standards based on the previous literature and the knowledge of experts from venture capitalists, security companies, credit evaluation companies, and consulting firms. In order to validate the evaluating factors in the models, this study was supported by analysts of top ranked venture capitalists in Korea. Through their assistance, this study can determine necessary evaluating factors that refined and deepened the models. Four expert groups, such as venture capitalists, credit analysts, analysts of security company and e-Business consultants, provide their knowledge for the determination of the weights of evaluating factors in the hierarchical model through the questionnaires and interviews. The results show that the weights of the evaluating factors differed by the maturity of e-Business company.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:시스템및이론
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.282-287
• /
• 2007

정보시스템을 이용하는 금융, 무역, 의료, 에너지, 교육 등 사회 각 분야에서 정보화가 급속하게 진전되고 있다. 정보시스템에 대한 보안관리는 위험분석평가가 선행 되어야하며, 보안위험분석은 요구되는 정보보호서비스의 취약점을 해결하고 위협으로부터 시스템을 안전하게 관리할 수 있는 최선의 방법이다. 본 논문에서는 최적의 평가계획을 수립한 수 있는 평가사례기반추론 기능을 모델링하였다. 평가 사례기반추론(case-based reasoning) 기능은 보안위험분석평가를 프로젝트단위로 관리하며, 기존의 평가사례 간유사도를 평가하고, 유사한 평가 사례를 바탕으로 최적의 보안위험분석평가 계획을 수립할 수 있다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to develop the evaluation indicator for the health promotion programs of the Community Health Centers and to test its validity. The modified logic model was used as the evaluation model based on the literature reviews. Using this model, four dimensions, eleven sub­dimensions, and forty­one individual indicators were developed. These evaluation indicators are superior in reflecting the distinctiveness of the community health promotion programs, and also flexible enough to accommodate diverse programs. These indicators also emphasize the role of process evaluation, and the diversity of outcomes. To test content validity, survey method of experts in the community health promotion field was conducted. Eleven in three expert groups(professionals, practitioners in Community Health Centers, and policy makers) generally agreed with the validity of evaluation indicators. To examine criteria and construct validity, these indicators were used to evaluate the health promotion programs conducted by the 18 Key Community Health Centers. The data came from the interview surveys of the main health promotion practitioner and 30 visitors from each center. The ranks of these eighteen Community Health Centers were computed from these data. There was no significant difference in ranking either by these indicators or by the existing indicators, which was developed by Technical Support and Evaluation Team for criteria validity. There was no statistically significant difference in ranking between input, process and outcome dimensions. Based on these study results, evaluation indicators developed in this study are valid to evaluate Community Health Center's health promotion program. It can be used both by the Community Health Center for internal evaluation, and by the stakeholders for external evaluation.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.177-209
• /
• 2007

This work firstly aims to analyse the balance between tangibles and intangibles as well as among human capital, structural capital and relational capital of evaluation indicators for the research institutes in science and technology sector conducted in 2006, by adopting intellectual capital model. The research question of this work comes from that while the R&D activity can produce both tangibles and intangibles, there have no been methodologies to relevantly measure and rationally judge these, in particular, intangible performance. The result shows that the institute evaluation system in 2006 had given more weight on tangibles and structural capital than intangibles and other intellectual capitals such as human capital and relational capital, in comparison to the past evaluation system, even though, in principle, the current evaluation system has to deal with the intangible research performances as well as tangible ones in economic, social and cultural perspective. Finally, based on these analysis, I will try to suggest some policy directions for overcoming the deficits of indicators in institute evaluation system.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.78-88
• /
• 2010

In this paper we develop a model for the performance evaluation of defense R&D test development projects based on analytic hierarchy process. First, evaluation indicators are collected through the related literature survey and a delphi inquiry method. Second, stepwise multiple linear regression is used for developing a hierarchical structure for analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation model, which can make the selected evaluation indicators of the hierarchical structure independent. Also we verify the effectiveness of proposed indicators of the performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. The developed indicators for the performance evaluation is more reasonable and practical than the previous indicators on defense R&D test development projects.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2019

In this paper, we propose a new batter evaluation model that reflects the skill of the opponent pitcher in Korean professional baseball. The model consists of evaluation factors such as Run Value, Contribution Score and Ball Consumption considering the pitcher grade. These evaluation factors are calculated as different data. In order to include the evaluation factors having different characteristics into one model, each evaluation factor is weighted and added. The genetic algorithms were used to calculate the weights, and the data were based on the 2016 records of Korea Professional Baseball and the salary data of the players of 2017. As a result of calculation of the weight, the weight of the Run Value was high and the weight of the Contribution Score was very low. This means that when calculating the annual salary, it reflects much of the expected score according to the batting result of the batter. On the other hand, the contribution score indicating the degree to which the batting result contributed to the victory of the team according to the state of the economy is not reflected in the salary or point system.

• 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.136-141
• /
• 2023

Artificial intelligence is becoming a global hot topic and is being actively applied in various industrial fields. Not only is artificial intelligence being applied to industrial sites in an on-premises method, but cloud-based artificial intelligence platforms are expanding into "as a service" type. The purpose of this study is to develop and verify a measurement tool for an evaluation framework for the adoption of a cloud-based artificial intelligence platform and test the interrelationships of evaluation variables. To achieve this purpose, empirical testing was conducted to verify the hypothesis using an expanded technology acceptance model, and factors affecting the intention to adopt a cloud-based artificial intelligence platform were analyzed. The results of this study are intended to increase user awareness of cloud-based artificial intelligence platforms and help various industries adopt them through the evaluation framework.

• 지역연구
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2023

주거환경에 대한 만족도는 주거지 선택 및 이주 등에 영향을 미치는 주요인으로, 도시에서의 삶의 질과 직접적으로 연결된다. 최근 온라인 부동산 서비스의 증가로 주거환경에 대한 사람들의 만족도를 쉽게 확인할 수 있으며, 사람들이 평가하는 내용을 바탕으로 주거환경 만족 요인에 대한 분석이 가능하다. 이는 기존에 활용되던 설문조사 등의 방식보다 더 많은 양의 평가를 효율적으로 활용할 수 있음을 의미한다. 본 연구는 서울특별시를 대상으로 온라인 부동산 서비스인 '직방'에서 수집된 약 3만여 건의 아파트 리뷰를 분석에 활용하였다. 리뷰에 포함된 추천 평점을 토대로, 아파트 리뷰를 긍정적, 부정적으로 분류하고, 딥 러닝 기반 자연어 처리 모델인 BERT(Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)를 사용하여 리뷰를 자동으로 분류하는 모델을 개발하였다. 이후 SHAP(SHAPley Additive exPlanation)를 이용하여 분류에 중요한 역할을 하는 단어 토큰을 도출함으로 주거환경 만족도의 영향요인을 도출하였다. 더 나아가 Word2Vec을 이용하여 관련 키워드를 분석함으로써 주거환경에 대한 만족도 개선을 위한 우선 고려사항을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 거주자의 정성평가 자료인 아파트 리뷰 빅데이터와 딥러닝을 활용하여 주거환경에 대한 만족도를 긍정적, 부정적으로 자동 분류하는 모형을 제안하여 그 영향요인을 도출하는데 의의가 있다. 분석결과는 주거환경 만족도 향상을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있으며 향후 아파트 단지 인근 주거환경 평가, 신규 단지 및 기반시설의 설계 및 평가 등에 활용될 수 있다.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2010

In R&D project evaluation, we consider the technical couple. And we set technology modular alternatives, after evaluating technical group based on technical couple. So we solve the problem extracted from existing research of R&D project evaluation. We use Conjoint Analysis(CA) for this research. CA is usually used for confirming customers' preference. However we use it for researchers' preference in the side of technology. This research is followed by the next 4 steps. (1) Hierarchical model of goal technology (2) Composition model of modular alternatives (3) Evaluation model of modular alternatives (4) Setting model of technology modular alternatives.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2003

The neutron induced nuclear data for Eu-153, Gd-155 and Cd-157 are calculated and evaluated in the high energy region. The evaluation procedure for deformed nuclei is setup by using Ecis-Empire codes. The energy dependent optical model potential parameters are searched based on the recent experimental data and applied up to 20 MeV. Optical model, full featured Hauser-Feshbach model and multistep direct and multistep compound model are used in the calculation. The direct-semidirect capture model and the direct coupled-channels contribution to discrete levels are introduced to improve the capture and inelastic scattering cross sections. The theoretically calculated cross sections are compared with the experimental data and the evaluated files. The model-calculated total and capture cross sections are in good agreement with the reference experimental data. The evaluated cross section results are compiled to ENDF-6 format and are expected to improve the ENDF/B-Vl.