• 대한치과마취과학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.9-12
• /
• 2013

General anesthesia has been developed in dentistry as a type of management technique to sedate patients who may be uncontrollable or require medical consideration. However, emergency treatment for controlling pain before general anesthesia could be required due to the time for medical evaluation for general anesthesia. There is a greater possibility of developing complications under extended waiting period. A disabled patient who needs dental treatment under general anesthesia underwent pretreatment with intramuscular injection of midazolam and $N_2O-O_2$ inhalation sedation in these cases report.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 2015

Sedation allows patients to maintain their airway independently and respond appropriately to physical stimulation and verbal command while maintaining a minimum depressed level of consciousness. Drugs commonly used for sedation of pediatric dental patients include a combination of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide-oxygen. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine and currently one of the most commonly used intravenous sedative agents. It can be easily titrated to provide a wide range of sedation, from conscious sedation to deep sedation, and exhibits a wide safety margin without severe respiratory and circulatory depression. At an appropriate dose, it also decreases patient anxiety and induces amnesia. We found that the submucosal administration of midazolam combined with chloral hydrate provided increased sedative effects and decreased the postoperative vomiting response compared with conventional chloral hydrate administration, with no significant difference in physiological responses. The depth of sedation can be titrated using this technique.

• 대한치과마취과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과마취과학회 2001년도 제1차 학술대회
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 2001

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.280-292
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to assess the sedative effect of three kinds of medication for management of the uncooperative 60 children aged from 16 months to 87 months required extensive treatment. The patients were given randomly a dose of 75mg/kg of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine 25mg orally or 0.5mg/kg of midazolam orally or 0.3mg/kg of midazolam intranasally. All the children were restrained in a Pediwrap and were monitored with Pulse oximeter for assessing the safety of patients. According to rating scale, sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior were checked for evaluation of the clinical sedative effect. The results were as follows: 1. In the evaluation of sleep, rating scale of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was superior to the other group(p<0.05). 2. In the evaluation of crying and movement at beginning of treatment, rating scale of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was superior to the other group(p<0.05), but during the treatment, rating scale of each group was not significantly different (p>0.05). 3. In the evaluation of overall behavior, 80% children of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine were rated good or very good. With the oral and intranasal midazolam, 60% children were rated good or very good respectively. 4. There were no clinical signs of significant cyanosis and respiratory depression. Clinically, chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was proved to be more effective sedation than any other sedative method. Oral and intranasal midazolam were also safe and effective sedation in young children undergoing pediatric dental procedures.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.87-90
• /
• 2006

Background: There are many ways to provide superior analgesia for postoperative pain after abdominal surgery of which epidural analgesics with opioids and local analgesics are the most useful. In an effort to maximize the level of analgesia and to minimize the side effects, ketamine, midazolam, clonidine, and adrenalin can be co-administrated as an adjuvant. This study examined the analgesic effect and side effects of midazolam compared with those given an epidural injection of bupivacaine, fentanyl and ketamine. Methods: In a double blind randomized controlled trial, 50 patients received either fentanyl $0.3{\mu}g/kg/h$ and ketamine 0.1 mg/kg/h (Group FK) or fentanyl $0.3{\mu}g/kg/h$, ketamine 0.1 mg/kg/h and midazolam 0.4 mg/h (Group FKM), added to 0.125% of bupivacaine at a rate of as much as 2 ml/h, for patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after low abdominal surgery. Ten minutes before surgery, the patients received either 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine or 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with the same amount of normal saline, added to fentanyl $50{\mu}g$. The pain score and the side effects were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours after surgery. Results: There was no difference in the pain score except for the VAS on coughing 1 hour after surgery. FKM group had fewer side effects. Conclusions: There was a better analgesic effect and fewer side effects with the addition of epidural midazolam to bupivacaine and fentanyl with ketamine formula. However, more study on the dose and route of administration will be needed.

• 대한치과마취과학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.111-114
• /
• 2012

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. Given high incidence of ADHD, many children with ADHD is likely to present for anesthesia. This case report suggests intramuscular premedication as an alternative method for anesthetic induction. A 9-year-old male patient with ADHD was transferred for dental treatment under general anesthesia. The patient refused to go into dental clinic office. Oral midazolam was given to the patient, however, he was resistant to take midazolam via oral route. Instead, we administer midazolam and ketamine via intramuscular route. After less than 10 miniutes, the patient became drowsy and was transferred to dental chair. Intravenous access and mask inhalation was possible. The patient received dental treatment under general anesthesia and recovered in a non-complicated way. In this case, intramuscular sedation with midazolam and ketamine was used as a premedication in highly uncoopearive patient refused to take oral sedative medication.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.245-254
• /
• 2018

Background: When performing dental treatment under general anesthesia in adult patients who have difficulty cooperating due to intellectual disabilities, anesthesia induction may be difficult as well. In particular, patients who refuse to come into the dental office or sit in the dental chair may have to be forced to do so. However, for adult patients with a large physique, physical restraint may be difficult, while oral sedatives as premedication may be helpful. Here, a retrospective analysis was performed to investigate the effect of oral sedatives. Methods: A hospital-based medical information database was searched for patients who were prescribed oral midazolam or triazolam between January 2009 and December 2017. Pre-anesthesia evaluation, anesthesia, and anesthesia recovery records of all patients were analyzed, and information on disability type, reason for prescribing oral sedatives, prescribed medication and dose, cooperation level during anesthesia induction, anesthesia duration, length of recovery room stay, and complications was retrieved. Results: A total of 97 patients were identified, of whom 50 and 47 received midazolam and triazolam, respectively. The major types of disability were intellectual disabilities, autism, Down syndrome, blindness, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy. Analyses of changes in cooperation levels after drug administration showed that anesthesia induction without physical restraint was possible in 56.0% of patients in the midazolam group and in 46.8% of patients in the triazolam group (P = 0.312). Conclusions: With administration of oral midazolam or triazolam, general anesthesia induction without any physical restraint was possible in approximately 50% of patients, with no difference between the drugs.

• Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.217-224
• /
• 2019

Purpose: Various publications on the use of sedation and anesthesia for diagnostic procedures in children have demonstrated that no ideal agent is available. Although propofol has been widely used for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children, adverse events including hypoxia and hypotension, are concerns in propofol-based sedation. Propofol is used in combination with other sedatives in order to reduce potential complications. We aimed to analyze whether the administration of midazolam would improve the safety and efficacy of propofol-based sedation in diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies in children. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of children who underwent diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies during a 30-month period. Demographic characteristics, vital signs, medication dosages, induction times, sedation times, recovery times, and any complications observed, were examined. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the midazolam-propofol and propofol alone groups. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of induction times, sedation times, recovery times, or the proportion of satisfactory endoscopist responses. No major procedural complications, such as cardiac arrest, apnea, or laryngospasm, occurred in any case. However, minor complications developed in 22 patients (10.7%), 17 (16.2%) in the midazolam-propofol group and five (5.0%) in the propofol alone group (p=0.010). Conclusion: The sedation protocol with propofol was safe and efficient. The administration of midazolam provided no additional benefit in propofol-based sedation.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.91-98
• /
• 2007

Chloral hydrate (CH)와 Hydroxyzine의 경구 복용을 이용한 진정과 Midazolam을 점막하 주사로 추가 투여한 진정을 Bispectral(BIS) index를 이용하여 두 진정법의 진정 깊이의 차이를 비교 평가하고자 하였다. 모든 환아는 2세-6세 사이의 미국 마취과학회 신체평가 등급 I의 건강한 환아로 진정 요법이 요구되었으며 국소마취와 최소 2개 이상의 치아에 대한 수복 치료가 치료에 포함되었다. 무작위 방법으로 환아를 CH(60mg/kg)와 Hydroxyzine(1mg/kg)을 복용하는 군과 CH(60mg/kg)와 Hydroxyzine(1mg/kg)을 복용하고 점막하 주사로 Midazolam(0.1mg/kg)을 추가 투여하는 군으로 나누었다. 진정 요법 동안 Nitrous Oxide는 두 군 모두 50%로 유지하였다. 환아 행동 평가는 녹화된 비디오 테이프를 보며 매 2분마다 Behavior scale을 이용하여 quiet(Q), crying(C), movement(M), or struggling(S)으로 측정하였다. 두 군의 진정 깊이 비교 평가를 위해 치료가 시작된 시점부터 40분 동안 2분 간격으로 측정한 Pulse rate(PR), Saturation percentage of $O_2(SpO_2)$, behavior scale과 매 2분 단위로 계산된 평균 BIS index를 t-test와 Levene's test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 두 군의 평균 BIS index와 BIS index의 분포는 유의할 만한 차이를 보였다(P<0.001). 점막하 주사로 Midazolam을 추가 투여한 군에서 평균 BIS index가 더 낮은 값을 가지며 표준 편차가 작았다 PR와 $SpO_2$는 두 그룹 모두 정상범위내의 값을 보였다. 점막하 주사를 이용한 Midazolam의 추가 투여는 안전성을 크게 침해하지 않는 범위 내에서 진정 깊이를 깊게 해주며 안정적인 진정을 이루게 함으로써 보다 바람직한 진정을 유도해 줄 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.40-48
• /
• 2005

전신상태가 양호하며 2회 이상의 치료가 필요한 남아 10명, 여아 12명 총 22명의 환아를 대상으로 chloral hydrate($Pocral^{(R)}$ syrup, 한림제약) 60mg/kg와 hydroxyzine($Ucerax^{(R)}$정, 한국 유씨비제약) 25mg을 병용투여한 군과 midazolam($Dormicum^{(R)}$, 주, 한국로슈) 0.5mg/kg과 hydroxyzine($Ucerax^{(R)}$ syrup, 한국 유씨비제약) 25mg을 병용투여한 군을 각각 I군과 II군으로 구분하였다. 약물 투여 30분 후 치과 치료를 시행하였으며 치료과정을 6단계로 구분하여 각 단계별로 수면지수와 울음지수, 움직임지수, 전반적인 행동지수를 측정, 비교하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 전반적인 행동지수를 기준으로 성공률을 평가한 결과 I 군은 59.2%, II군은 77.3%의 성공률을 보였다(p<0.05). 2. 수면지수는 I 군에서 평균 $1.81{\pm}0.93$으로 II 군의 $1.44{\pm}0.69$에 비해 유의하게 깊은 수면상태를 보였다(p<0.05). 3. 울음치수, 움직임지수, 전반적인 행동지수는 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다(p>0.05). 4. 성별에 따른, 연령에 따른 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다(p>0.05). 위와 같은 결과를 종합하여 볼 때 midazolam의 경구투여는 적절한 진정효과를 가지는 방법으로 어린환자의 치과치료시 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.